Begin the journey with the end in mind

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 239-252

  Klimoski, Richard ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Board membership; Board outcome assessment; Effective journal boards; Functional approach to boards

Indexed keywords

EID: 61449111762     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: 15527425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428108317204     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Agarwal, R., & Hoetker, G. (2007). A Faustian bargain? The growth of management and its relationship to related disciplines. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (6). 1304-1322.
2. Bartunek, J.M. (2007). Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: Toward a relational scholarship of integration. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (6). 1323-1333.
3. Bedeian, A.G., Van Fleet, D.D., & Hyman, H.H. (2009). Scientific achievement and editorial board membership. Organizational Research Methods, 12 (2). 211-238.
4. Biehl, M., Kim, H., & Wade, M. (2006). Relationships among the academic business disciplines: A multi-method citation analysis. Omega, 34, 359-371.
5. Borman, W.C., & Motowidlo, S.J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10, 99-109.
6. Boyack, K.W., Klavans, R., & Borner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64, 341-374.
7. Cacioppo, J. (2007). Psychology is a hub science. Observer, 20 (8). 3-4.
8. Denisi, A. (in press). Managing the editorial review process: It's the people that matter. In Y. Baruch, A. Konrad, H. Aguinis, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
9. Feldman, D.C. (in press). Building and maintaining a strong editorial board and core of as hoc reviewers. In Y. Baruch, A. Konrad, H. Aguinis, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Glenn, D. (2008, February 1). New economics journals: Supply, demand, risk. Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A10.
11. Hambrick, D.C. (2007). The field of management's devotion to theory: Too much of a good thing ? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1346-1352.
12. Harvey, C., Morris, H., & Kelly, A. (Eds.). (2007). Academic journal quality guide. London: Association of Business Schools.
13. Kacmar, K.M. (in press). Setting up an effective manuscript review process. In Y. Baruch, A. Konrad, H. Aguinis, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
14. Klimoski, R.J. (in press). Team performance effectiveness. In J. Levine & M. Hogg (Eds.), Encyclopedia of group processes and intergroup relations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Klimoski, R.J., & Zukin, L. (1999). Selection and staffing for team effectiveness. In E. Sundstrom (Ed.), Supporting work team effectiveness (pp. 63-94). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Macdonald, S., Kam, J. (2007). Aardvark et al.: Quality journals and gamesmanship in management studies. Journal of Information Science, 33, 702-717.
17. Marks, M.A., Zaccaro, S.J., & Mathieu, J.E. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
18. Miller, G.A. (2007). NIH examines peer review. Observer, 20 (11). 25-27.
19. Pfeffer, J. (2007). A modest proposal: How might we change the process and product of managerial research. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (6). 1334-1345.
20. Rynes, S.L. (2007). Editors foreword: Tackling the "great divide" between research production and dissemination in human resource management. Academy of Management Journal, 50 (5). 985-986.
21. Rynes, S.L. (in press). Communicating with authors. In Y. Baruch, A. Konrad, H. Aguinis, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Opening the black box of editorship. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
22. Schmitt, N., & Borman, W.C. (1993). Personnel selection in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23. Tsui A.S.; Hollenbeck J.R., Successful authors and effective reviewers: Balancing supply and demand in the organizational sciences. Organizational Research Methods. 2009, 12(2); 253-258