Dynamic assessment and a reversal task: A contribution to needs-based assessment

Educational and Child Psychology

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 81-98

  Bosma, Tirza ^a   Resing, Wilma C M ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 61449100281     PISSN: 02671611     EISSN: 23968702     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Büchel, F.P. & Hessels-Schlatter, C. (2001). Analogical reasoning learning test (ARLT). Instruction manual. Geneva: Unpublished manuscript.
2. Campione, J.C. & Brown, A.L. (1987). Linking dynamic assessment with school achievement. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic asessment: An interactional aproach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 82–115). New York: Guilford Press.
3. Day, J.D., Engelhardt, J.L., Maxwell, S.E. & Bolig, E.E. (1997). Comparison of static and dynamic assessment procedures and their relation to independent performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 358–368.
4. De Bruyn, E.E.J., Pameijer, N.K., Ruijssenaars, A.J.J.M. & Van Aarle, E.J.M. (2003). De diagnostische cyclus. Een praktijkleer. [The diagnostic cycle. A practicioner’s guide.] Leuven: ACCO.
5. Elliot, J.G. (2000). Dynamic assessment in educational contexts: Purpose and promise. In C.S. Lidz & J.G. Elliott (Vol. Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice: Vol. 6. Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 713–740). New York: Elsevier.
6. Elliott, J.G. (2003). Dynamic assessment in educational settings: Realising potential. Educational Review, 55, 15–32.
7. Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. & Hoffman, M.B. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device, theory, instruments and techniques. Baltimore: University Park Press.
8. Goswami, U. (1992). Analogical reasoning in children. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Hessels, M.G.P. (1997). Low IQ but high learning potential: Why Zeyneb and Moussa do not belong in special education. Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 121–136.
10. Hessels-Schlatter, C. (2002a). A dynamic test to assess learning capacity in people with severe impairments. Americal Journal on Mental Retardation, 107, 340–351.
11. Hessels-Schlatter, C. (2002b). Moderate mental retardation and learning capacity: The analogical reasoning test. In G.M. Van der Aalsvoort, W.C.M. Resing & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (Vol. Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice: Vol. 7. Learning potential assessment and cognitive training (pp. 249–271). New York: Elsevier Science.
12. Kohnstamm, G.A. (1967). Teaching children to solve a Piagetian problem of class inclusion. Dissertation. ’s-Gravenhage: Mouton & Co.
13. Klauer, K.J. (1989). Paradigmatic teaching of inductive thinking. In H. Mandl, E. de Corte, N. Bennet & H.F. Friedrichs (Eds.), Learning and instruction. Vol 2. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
14. Lauchlan, F. (2001). Addressing the social, cognitive and emotional needs of children: The case for dynamic assessment. Educational and Child Psychology, 18, 4–18.
15. Lidz, C.S. (1992). Dynamic assessment: Some thoughts on the model, the medium, and the message. In J.S. Carlson (Ed.), Advances in cognition and educational practice, Vol. 1. Theoretical issues: Intelligence, cognition and assessment. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
16. Lidz, C.S. & Elliott, J.G. (2000). Introduction. In C.S. Lidz & J.G. Elliott (Vol. Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice: Vol. 6. Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 3–13). New York: Elsevier Science Inc.
17. Lidz, C.S. & Jepsen, R.H. (2000). The Aplication of Cognitive Functions Scale (ACFS). New York: Unpublished manuscript.
18. Lifshitz, H., Tzuriel, D. & Weiss, I. (2005). Effects of training in conceptual versus perceptual analogies among adolescents and adults with intellectual disability. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 5, 144 –166.
19. Pameijer, N.K. & Beukering, J.T.E. Van (2004). Handelingsgerichte diagnostiek: een praktijkmodel voor diagnostiek en advisering bij onderwijsleerproblemen [Needs-based assessment: a practictioner’s model for diagnosis and educational consultancey]. Leuven/Voorburg: ACCO.
20. Pellegrino, J.W. & Glaser, R. (1982). Analyzing aptitudes for learning: Inductive reasoning. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology. Vol. 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21. Resing, W.C.M. (1990). Intelligentie en leerpotentieel. Een odnerzoek naar het leerpotentieel van jonge leerlingen uit het basis-en speciaal onderwijs. [Intelligence and learning potential. A study on the learning potential of young children from primary schoools and special education.] Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
22. Resing, W.C.M. (1997). Learning potential assessment: The alternative for measuring intelligence? Educational and Child Psychology, 14, 68–82.
23. Resing, W.C.M. (2000). Assessing the Learning Potential for Inductive Reasoning (LIR) in young children. In J.S. Carlson (Series Ed.) & C.S. Lidz & J.G. Elliott (Vol. Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice: Vol. 6. Dynamic assessment: Prevailing models and applications (pp. 229–262). New York: Elsevier Science.
24. Resing, W.C.M. (2001). Beyond Binet: All testing should be dynamic testing. Issues in Education, 7, 225–235.
25. Resing, W.C.M., Ruijssenaars, A.J.J.M. & Bosma, T. (2002). Dynamic assessment: Using measures for learning potential in the diagnostic process. In J.S. Carlson (Series Ed.) & G.M. Van der Aalsvoort, W.C.M. Resing & A.J.J.M. Ruijssenaars (Vol. Eds.), Advances in cognition and educational practice: Vol. 7. Learning potential assessment and cognitive training (pp. 29–64). New York: Elsevier Science.
26. Siegler, R.S. (1995). How does change occur: A microgenetic study of number conservation. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 225–273.
27. Sternberg, R.J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28. Sternberg R.J. & Nigro, G. (1980). Developmental patterns in the solution of verbal analogies. Child Development, 51, 27–38.
29. Tunteler, E. & Resing, W.C.M. (in press). Effects of prior assistance in using analogies on young children’s unprompted analogical problem solving over time: A microgenetic study. British Journal of Educational Psychology.
30. Tzuriel, D. (2000). Dynamic assessment of young children: Educational and intervention perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 12, 385–435.
31. Tzuriel, D. & Galinka, E. (2000). Children’s conceptual and perceptual analogical modifiability test: Instruction manual. Ramat Gan: School of Education, Bar Ilan University.