Impact of route choice set on route choice probabilities

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2076, 2008, Pages 10-19

  Bliemer, Michiel C J ^a   Bovy, Piet H L ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

QUALITY CONTROL; TRANSPORTATION ROUTES;

CHOICE MODEL; ESTIMATED PARAMETER; ESTIMATION PERFORMANCE; FLOWS IN NETWORKS; MODELING QUALITY; PROPERTY; ROUTE CHOICE; ROUTE CHOICE MODEL; ROUTE CHOICE PROBABILITY; ROUTE SETS;

FORECASTING;

EID: 61349195817     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2076-02     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bovy, P. H. L. Modeling Route Choice Sets in Transportation Networks: A Preliminary Synthesis. Proc., 6th TRISTAN Conference, Phuket, Thailand, 2007.
2. Prato, C. O., and S. Bekhor. Modeling Route Choice Behavior: How Relevant Is the Composition of Choice Set? In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2003, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007.
3. Bekhor, S., T. Toledo, and J. N. Prashker. Implementation Issues of Route Choice Models in Path-Based Algorithms. Proc., 11th IATBR Conference, Kyoto, Japan, 2006.
4. Bekhor, S., and C. G. Prato. Effects of Choice Set Composition in Route Choice Modeling. Proc., 11th IATBR Conference, Kyoto, Japan, 2006.
5. Frejinger, E. Random Sampling of Alternatives in a Route Choice Context. In Proceedings of the European Transport Conference, Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands, 2007.
6. McFadden, D. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In Frontiers in Econometrics (P. Zarembka, ed.), Academic Press, New York, 1973, pp. 105-142.
7. Cascetta, E., A. Nuzzolo, F. Russo, and A. Vitetta. A Modified Logit Route Choice Model Overcoming Path Overlapping Problems: Specification and Some Calibration Results for Interurban Networks. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory (J. B. Lesort, ed.), Lyon, France, 1996, pp. 697-711.
8. Ben-Akiva, M., and M. Bierlaire. Discrete Choice Methods and Their Applications to Short Term Travel Decisions. In Handbook of Transportation Science (R. Hall, ed.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1999, pp. 5-34.
9. Cascetta, E. Transportation Systems Engineering: Theory and Methods, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2001.
10. Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S., R. van Nes, and P. H. L. Bovy. Path Size and Overlap in Multimodal Transport Networks: A New Interpretation. In Transportation and. Traffic Theory: Flow, Dynamics and Human Interaction (H. Mahinassani, ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2005, pp. 63-84.
11. Ramming, M. S. Network Knowledge and Route Choice. PhD thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2002.
12. Frejinger, E., and M. Bierlaire. Capturing Correlation in Large-Scale Route Choice Models. Technical Report RO-060106. Operations Research Group ROSO, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland, 2006.
13. Bovy, P. H. L., S. Bekhor, and G. Prato. The Factor of Revisited Path Size: Alternative Derivation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2076, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008, pp. 132-140.
14. Chu, C. A Paired Combinatorial Logit Model for Travel Demand Analysis. Proc., 5th World Conference on Transportation Research, Vol. 4, Ventura, Calif., 1989, pp. 295-309.
15. Koppelman, F. S., and C-H. Wen. The Paired Combinatorial Logit Model: Properties, Estimation, and Application, Transportation Research B, Vol. 34,2000, pp. 75-89.
16. Prashker, J. N., and S. Bekhor. Investigation of Stochastic Network Loading Procedures. In Transportation Research Record 1645, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 94-102.
17. Gliebe, J. P., F. S. Koppelman, and A. Ziliaskopoulos. Route Choice Using Paired Combinatorial Logit Model. Presented at 78th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 1999.
18. Benjamins, M., C. D. R. Lindveld, and R. van Nes. Multimodal Travel Choice Modeling: Supernetwork Approach. Presented at 81st Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2002.
19. McFadden, D. Modelling the Choice of Residential Location. In Theory and Residential Location (A. Karlquist, ed.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1978, pp. 75-96.
20. Vovsha, P. Application of Cross-Nested Logit Model to Mode Choice in Tel Aviv, Israel, Metropolitan Area. In Transportation Research Record 1607, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 6-15.
21. Vovsha, P., and S. Bekhor. Link-Nested Logit Model of Route Choice: Overcoming Route Overlapping Problem. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1645, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 133-142.
22. Hoogendoorn-Lanser, S. Modelling Travel Behavior in Multi-modal Networks. PhD thesis. Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands, 2005.
23. Prato, C. G., and S. Bekhor. Applying Branch-and-Bound Technique to Route Choice Set Generation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board., No. .1985, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 19-28.
24. Fiorenzo-Catalano, S., R. van Nes, and P. H. L. Bovy. Choice Set Generation for Multi-modal Travel Analysis. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.
25. Bovy, P. H. L., and S. Fiorenzo-Catalano. Stochastic Route Choice Set Generation: Behavioural and Probabilistic Foundations. Presented at 11th International Conference on Travel Behaviour Research, Kyoto, Japan, 2006.
26. Bliemer, M. C. J., P. H. L. Bovy, and H. Li. Some Properties and Implications of Stochastically Generated Route Choice Sets. Proc., 6th TRISTAN Conference, Phuket, Thailand, 2007.