Modeling route choice behavior: How relevant is the composition of choice set?

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2003, 2007, Pages 64-73

  Prato, Carlo Giacomo ^a   Bekhor, Shlomo ^b  

^a Transportation Research Institute

^b TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; ROBUST CONTROL;

NONNESTED STRUCTURES; QUALITATIVE PERSPECTIVES; ROUTE CHOICE MODELS;

TRANSPORTATION ROUTES;

EID: 38849201759     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2003-09     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ben-Akiva, M. E., M. J. Bergman, A. J. Daly, and R. Ramaswamy. Modeling Inter-Urban Route Choice Behaviour. In Proc., 9th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, VNU Science Press, Utrecht, Netherlands, 1984, pp. 299-330.
2. De La Barra, T., B. Perez, and J. Anez. Multidimensional Path Search and Assignment. Presented at 21st PTRC Summer Annual Meeting, Manchester, United Kingdom, 1993.
3. Azevedo, J. A., M. E. O. Santos Costa, J. J. E. R. Silvestre Madera, and E. Q. Vieira Martins. An Algorithm for the Ranking of Shortest Paths. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 69, 1993, pp. 97-106.
4. Bekhor, S., M. Ben-Akiva, and S. Ramming. Route Choice: Choice Set Generation and Probabilistic Choice Models. In Proc., 4th Triennial Symposium on Transportation Analysis Conference, University of Azores, Sao Miguel, Portugal, 2001, pp. 459-464.
5. Prato, C. G., and S. Bekhor. Applying Branch-and-Bound Technique to Route Choice Set Generation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1985, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, pp. 19-28.
6. Cascetta, E., A. Nuzzolo, F. Russo, and A. Vitetta. A Modified Logit Route Choice Model Overcoming Path Overlapping Problems: Specification and Some Calibration Results for Interurban Networks. In Proc., 13th International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory, Pergamon, Lyon, France, 1996, pp. 697-711.
7. Ben-Akiva, M., and M. Bierlaire. Discrete Choice Methods and Their Applications to Short Term Travel Decisions. In Handbook of Transportation Science, Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1999, pp. 5-12.
8. Ramming, S. Network Knowledge and Route Choice. PhD thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 2001.
9. Prashker, J. N., and S. Bekhor. Investigation of Stochastic Network Loading Procedures. In Transportation Research Record 1645, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 94-102.
10. Bekhor, S., and J. N. Prashker. Stochastic User Equilibrium Formulation for Generalized Nested Logit Model. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1752, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 84-90.
11. Yai, T., S. Iwakura, and S. Morichi. Multinomial Probit with Structured Covariance for Route Choice Behavior. Transportation Research B. Vol. 31, 1997, pp. 195-207.
12. Bekhor, S., M. S. Ben-Akiva, and S. M. Ramming. Adaptation of Logit Kernel to Route Choice Situation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 78-85.
13. Bierlaire, M., and E. Frejinger. Route Choice Models with Subpath Components. Presented at 5th Swiss Transport Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland, 2005.
14. Ortuzar, J. D., and L. G. Willumsen. Modelling Transport, 3rd ed. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, United Kingdom, 2001.
15. Stopher, P. Captivity and Choice in Travel Behavior Models. Transportation Journal of ASCE, Vol. 106, 1980, pp. 427-435.
16. Williams, H. C. W. L., and J. D. Ortuzar. Behavioural Theories of Dispersion and Mis-specification of Travel Demand Models. Transportation Research B, Vol. 16, 1982, pp. 167-219.
17. Swait, J., and M. Ben-Akiva. Incorporating Random Constraints in Discrete Models of Choice Set Generation. Transportation Research B, Vol.21, 1987, pp. 91-102.
18. Swait, J., and M. Ben-Akiva. Empirical Test of a Constrained Choice Discrete Model: Mode Choice in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Transportation Research B, Vol. 21,1987, pp. 103-115.
19. Basar, G., and C. R. Bhat. A Parameterized Probabilistic Consideration Set Model for Airport Choice: An Application to the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Research B, Vol. 38, 2004, pp. 889-904.
20. McFadden, D. Modeling the Choice of Residential Location. In Transportation Research Record 673, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1978, pp. 72-77.
21. Nerella, S., and C. R. Bhat. Numerical Analysis of Effect of Sampling of Alternatives in Discrete Choice Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1894, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 11-19.
22. Hansen, E. Industrial Location Choice in Sao Paulo, Brazil: A Nested Logit Model. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 17, 1987, pp. 89-108.
23. Friedman, J., D. Gerlowski, and J. Silberman. What Attracts Foreign Multinational Corporations? Evidence from Branch Plant Location in the United States. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 32, 1992, pp. 403-418.
24. Woodward, D. Location Determinants of Japanese Manufacturing Start-ups in the United States. Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 58, 1992, pp. 690-708.
25. Ben-Akiva, M., and J. L. Bowman. Integration of an Activity-Based Model System and a Residential Location Model. Urban Studies, Vol. 35, 1998, pp. 1131-1153.
26. Sermons, M. W., and F. S. Koppelman. Representing Differences Between Female and Male Commute Behavior in Residential Location Choice Models. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 9, 2001, pp. 101-110.
27. Bhat, C. R., and J. Y. Guo. A Mixed Spatially Correlated Model: Formulation and Application to Residential Choice Modeling. Transportation Research B, Vol. 38, 2004, pp. 147-168.
28. Pozsgay, M. A., and C. R. Bhat. Destination Choice Modeling for Home-Based Recreational Trips: Analysis and Implications for Land Use, Transportation, and Air Quality Planning. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1777, TRB, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 47-54.
29. Schlich, R., A. Simma, and K. W. Axhausen. Destination Choice Modeling for Different Leisure Activities. Presented at 2nd Swiss Transport Research Conference, Ascona, Switzerland, 2002.
30. Ben-Akiva, M., D. McFadden, and K. Train. The Demand for Local Telephone Service: A Fully Discrete Model of Residential Calling Patterns and Service Choices. Rand Journal of Economics, Vol. 18, 1987, pp. 109-123.
31. Gilbride, T. J., and G. M. Allenby. A Choice Model with Conjunctive, Disjunctive, and Compensatory Screening Rules. Marketing Science, Vol. 23, 2004, pp. 391-406.
32. Prato, C. G., S. Bekhor, and C. Pronello. Methodology for Exploratory Analysis of Latent Factors Influencing Drivers' Behavior. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1926, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 115-125.
33. Prato, C. G. Latent Factors and Route Choice Behaviour. PhD thesis. Turin Polytechnic, Italy. 2005.