European Union legislation

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Volumn 622, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 78-85

  Hodges, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Collective redress; Competition; Consumer protection; Damages; European Union; Reform.

Indexed keywords

EID: 61349133589     PISSN: 00027162     EISSN: 15523349     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002716208328287     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Docekal, M. U., P. Kolba, H.-W Micklitz, and P. Rott. 2005. The implementation of Directive 98/27/EC in the member states. Bamberg/Vienna, Austria: Institute for European Business and Consumer Law in cooperation with the Consumer Protection Association.
2. Eilmansberger, T. 2007. The green paper on damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules and beyond: Reflections on the utility and feasibility of stimulating private enforcement through legislative action. Common Market Law Revietv 44:431.
3. Hodges, C. 2006. Competition enforcement, regulation and civil justice: What is the case? Common Market Law Review 43:1381-1407.
4. -. 2008. Reform of class and representative actions in Europe: A nexo approach to collective redress. Oxford, UK: Hart.
5. Micklitz, H.-W., and A. Stadler. 2006. The development of collective legal actions in Europe, especially in German civil procedure. European Business Law Review 17:1473-1503.
6. Reich, N. 2007. Horizontal liability in. EC law: Hybridisation, of remedies for compensation, in case of breaches of EC rights. Common Market Law Review 44:705.
7. Stuyck, J., et al. 2007. Commission study on alternative means of consumer redress other than redress through ordinary judicial proceedings. Leuven, the Netherlands: Catholic University of Leuven.
8. Wils, W. P. J. 2003. Should private antitrust enforcement, be encouraged in Europe? World Competition 26 (3): 473-88.