Comparison of vehicle-ownership models

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2076, 2008, Pages 97105-

  Potoglou, Dimitris ^a,b   Susilo, Yusak O ^c  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SURVEYS;

CAR OWNERSHIP; DISCRETE CHOICE MODELS; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; MODELING STRUCTURES; MULTINOMIAL LOGIT; MULTINOMIAL LOGIT MODEL; ORDERED LOGIT; ORDERED PROBIT; OWNERSHIP MODEL; VEHICLE OWNERSHIP;

VEHICLES;

EID: 61349121380     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2076-11     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Ortuzar, J. D., and L. G. Willumsen. Modeling Transport. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom, 2001.
2. Fenger, J. Urban Air Quality. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 33, 1999, pp. 4877-4900.
3. Miller, E. J., J. D. Hunt, J. E. Abraham, and P. A. Salvini. Microsimulating Urban Systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, Vol. 28, 2003, pp. 9-44.
4. Bunch, D. S. Automobile Demand and Type Choice. In Handbook of Transport Modeling (D. A. Hensher and K. J. Button, eds.), Pergamon, New York, 2000, pp. 463-479.
5. Miller, E. J., D. S. Kriger, and J. D. Hunt. Integrated Urban Models for Simulation of Transit and Land-Use Policies. University of Toronto, Joint Program in Transportation and DELCAN Corporation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1998.
6. Bhat, C. R., and V. Pulugurta. A Comparison of Two Alternative Behavioural Choice Mechanisms for Household Auto Ownership Decisions. Transportation Research B, Vol. 32, No. 1, 1998, pp. 61-75.
7. Chu, Y.-L. Automobile Ownership Analysis Using Ordered Probit Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1805, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 60-67.
8. Kim, H. S., and E. Kim. Effects of Public Transit on Automobile Ownership and Use in Households of the USA. RURDS-The Applied Regional Science Conference (ARSC), Vol. 16, No. 3, 2004, pp. 245-262.
9. Ryan, J. M., and G. Han. Vehicle-Ownership Model Using Family Structure and Accessibility Application to Honolulu, Hawaii. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1676, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 1-10.
10. Purvis, C. L. Using 1990 Census Public Use Microdata Sample to Estimate Demographic and Automobile Ownership Models. In Transportation Research Record 1443, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 21-29.
11. Potoglou, D., and P. S. Kanaroglou. Modelling Car Ownership in Urban Areas: A Case Study of Hamilton, Canada. Journal of Transportation Geography, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2008, pp. 42-54.
12. National Household Travel Survey. FHWA, Washington, D.C. nhts.ornl.gov/download.shtml. Accessed March 2007.
13. van Evert, H., W. Brog, and E. Erl. Survey Design: The Past, the Present and the Future. In Travel Survey Methods-Quality and Future Directions (P. Stopher and C. Stecher, eds.), Elsevier, London, 2006, pp. 75-93.
14. Susilo, Y. O., and R. Kitamura. Structural Changes in Commuters' Daily Travel: The Case of Auto and Transit Commuters in the Osaka Metropolitan Area of Japan, 1980 Through 2000. Transportation Research A, Vol. 42, 2008, pp. 95-115.
15. Borooah, V. K. Logit and Probit: Ordered and Multinomial Models. Sage Publications, London, 2001.
16. McKelvey, R. D., and W. Zavoina. A Statistical Model for the Analysis of Ordinal Level Dependent Variables. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, Vol. 4, 1975, pp. 103-120.
17. Greene, W. H. Econometric Analysis, 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 2000.
18. McFadden, D. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behaviour. In Frontiers in Econometrics (P. Zerembka, ed.), Academic Press, New York, 1973, pp. 105-142.
19. Ben-Akiva, M., and S. R. Lerman Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1985.
20. Train, K. Discrete Choice with Simulations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2002.
21. Weeks, M. The Multinomial Probit Model Revisited: A Discussion of Parameter Estimability, Identification and Specification Testing. Journal of Economic Surveys, Vol. 11, No. 3, 1997, pp. 297-320.
22. Horowitz, J. L. Reconsidering the Multinomial Probit Model. Transportation Research B, Vol. 25, No. 6, 1980, pp. 433-438.
23. Akaike, H. Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. Proc., 2nd International Symposium on Information Theory, Akademiai Kaido, Budapest, Hungary, 1973, pp. 267-281.
24. Hurvich, C. M., and C. Tsai. Regression and Time Series Model Selection in Small Samples. Biometrika, Vol. 76, No. 2, 1989, pp. 297-307.
25. Schwarz, G. Estimating the Dimension of a Model. Annals of Statistics, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1978, pp. 461-464.
26. Hannan, E., and B. Quinn. The Determination of the Order of an Autoregression. Journal of the Royal Society Series B (Methodological), Vol. 41, No. 2, 1979, pp. 190-195.
27. Greene, W. H. Nlogit Version 3. Econometric Software Inc., New York, 2002.
28. Susilo, Y. O., and K. Maat. The Influence of Built Environment to the Trends in Commuting Journeys in the Netherlands. Transportation, Vol. 34, 2007, pp. 589-609.