Accessibility, travel behavior, and new urbanism case study of mixed-use centers and auto-oriented corridors in the South Bay region of Los Angeles, California

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2082, 2008, Pages 81-89

  Joh, Kenneth ^a   Boarnet, Marlon G ^a   Nguyen, Mai Thi ^b   Fulton, William ^c   Siembab, Wally ^d   Weaver, Susan ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^c Soumar Research Group   (United States)

^d Slembab Planning Associates   (United States)

^e Weaver Research and Consulting Group   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

URBAN PLANNING;

BUILT ENVIRONMENT; CALIFORNIA; CASE-STUDIES; DRIVING TRIPS; LOS ANGELES; NEW URBANISMS; QUALITY OF LIFE; TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR; URBAN DESIGN; WALKING TRIPS;

LAND USE;

EID: 61349094729     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2082-10     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Calthorpe, P. The Next American Metropolis. Princeton Architectural Press, Princeton, N.J., 1993.
2. Duany, A., and E. Plater-Zyberk. Towns and Town-Making Principles. Rizzoli, New York, 1991.
3. Crane, R. On Form Versus Function: Will the New Urbanism Reduce Traffic, or Increase It? Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol, 15, 1996, pp. 117-126.
4. Duany, A., E. Plater-Zyberk, and J. Speck. Suburban Nation: The Rise of Sprawl and the Decline of the American Dream. North Point Press, New York, 2000.
5. Kulash, W., J. Anglin, and D. Marks. Traditional Neighborhood Development: Will the Traffic Work? Development, Vol. 21, 1990, pp. 21-24.
6. Stone, J., and C. Johnson. Neo-Traditional Neighborhoods: A Solution to Traffic Congestion? In Site Impact Traffic Assessment (R. Paaswell, N. Rouphail, and T. Sutaria, eds.), American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 1992, pp. 72-76.
7. McNally, M. G., and S. Ryan. Comparative Assessment of Travel Characteristics for Neotraditional Designs. In Transportation Research Record 1400, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 67-77.
8. Boarnet, M., and R. Crane. Travel by Design: The Influence of Urban Design on Travel. Oxford University Press, New York, 2001.
9. Cervero, R., and R. Gorham. Commuting in Transit Versus Automobile Neighborhoods. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 61, No. 2, 1995, pp. 21-26.
10. Frank, L., and G. Pivo. Impacts of Mixed Use and Density on Utilization of Three Modes of Travel: Single-Occupant Vehicle, Transit, Walking. In Transportation Research Record 1466, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 44-52.
11. Newman, P., and J. Kenworthy. Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence. Island Press, Washington, D.C., 1999.
12. Handy, S. L. Understanding the Link Between Urban Form and Non-work Travel Behavior. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 15, 1996, pp. 183-198.
13. Cervero, R., and K. Kockelman. Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design. Transportation Research, Part D, Vol. 2, 1997, pp. 199-219.
14. Kulkarni, A. The Influence of Land Use and Network Structure on Travel Behavior. MA thesis. University of California, Irvine, 1996.
15. Crane, R., and R. Crepeau. Does Neighborhood Design Influence Travel? A Behavioral Analysis of Travel Diary and GIS Data. Transportation Research, Part D, Vol. 3, No. 4, 1996, pp. 225-238.
16. Krizek, K. Operationalizing Neighborhood Accessibility for Land Use-Travel Behavior Research and Regional Modeling. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 22, 2003, pp. 270-287.
17. Handy, S. L., and K. Clifton. Local Shopping as a Strategy for Reducing Automobile Travel. Transportation, Vol. 28, 2001, pp. 317-346.
18. Handy, S. L., X. Cao, and P. Mokhtarian. Correlation or Causality Between the Built Environment and Travel Behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transportation Research, Part D, Vol. 10, 2005, pp. 427-444.
19. Kitamura, R., P. Mokhtarian, and L. Laidet. A Micro-Analysis of Land Use and Travel in Five Neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation, Vol. 24, 1997, pp. 125-158.
20. Mixed-Use Centers in the South Bay: How Do They Function and Do They Change Travel Demand? Solimar Research Group, Ventura, Calif., 2005.
21. Cameron, A., and P. Trivedi. Regression Analysis of Count Data. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1998.
22. Pinjari, A. R., C. R. Bhat, and D. Hensher. Incorporating Residential Self-Selection Effects in Activity Time-Use Behavior: Formulation and Application of a Joint Mixed Multinomial Logit-Multiple DiscreteContinuous Extreme Value Model. Technical paper. Department of Civil, Architectural & Environmental Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, 2007. www.ce.utexas.edu/prof/bhat/ABSTRACTS/selfselection.pdf.