How to blunt the sword of compositionality

Nous

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 313-334

  Robbins, Philip ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60949372795     PISSN: 00294624     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0068.00373     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Arjo, D. (1996), "Sticking Up for Oedipus: Fodor on Intentional Generalizations and Broad Content." Mind and Language 11: 23 1-45.
2. Aydede, M. and Robbins, P. (2001). "Are Frege Cases Exceptions to Intentional Generalizations?" Canadian Journai of Philosophy 31: 1-22.
3. Block, N. (1986). "Advertisement for a Semantics for Psychology." Midwest Studies in Philosophy 10: 615-78.
4. Cowie, F. (1999). What's Within? Nativism Reconsidered. Oxford University Press.
5. Fodor, J. A. (1994a). "Concepts: A Potboiler." Cognition 50: 95-113.
6. -. (1994b). The Elm anil the Expert: Mentalese and Its Semantics. MIT Press.
7. -. (1998a). Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. MIT Press.
8. -. (1998b). "There Are No Recognitional Concepts - Not Even RED." In In Critical Condition. MIT Press.
9. Fodor, J. A. and Lepore, E. (1992). Holism: A Shopper's Guide. Blackwell.
10. -. (1996). "The Red Herring and the Pet Fish: Why Concepts Still Can't Be Prototypes." Cognition 58: 253-70.
11. Hampton, J. A. (1988). "Overextension of Conjunctive Concepts: Evidence for a Unitary Model of Concept Typicality and Class Inclusion." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14: 12-32.
12. -. (1991). "The Combination of Prototype Concepts." In Schwanenflugel, P. J., éd., The Psychology of Word Meanings. Erlbaum.
13. Horwich, P. (1997). "The Composition of Meanings." Philosophical Review 106: 503-31.
14. Kunda, Z. et al. (1990). "Combining Social Concepts: The Role of Causal Reasoning." Cognitive Science 14: 551-77.
15. Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Stanford University Press.
16. Laurence, S. and Margolis, E. (1999). "Concepts and Cognitive Science." In Margolis, E. and Laurence, S., eds., Concepts: Core Readings. MIT Press.
17. Matthews, R. J. (1997). "Can Connectionists Explain Systematicity?" Mind and Language 12: 154-77.
18. Murphy, G. L. (1988). "Comprehending Complex Concepts." Cognitive Science 12: 529-62.
19. Murphy, G. L. and Medin, D. L. (1985). "The Role of Theories in Conceptual Coherence." Psychological Review 92: 289-316.
20. Osherson, D. N. and Smith, E. E. (1981). "On the Adequacy of Prototype Theory as a Theory of Concepts." Cognition 9: 35-58.
21. Partee, B. (1995). "Lexical Semantics and Compositionality." In Gleitman, L. and Liberman, M., eds., Language: An Invitation to Cognitive Science, vol. 2. MIT Press, 2nd ed.
22. Prinz, J. J. (forthcoming). Furnishing the Mind: Concepts and Their Perceptual Basis. MIT Press.
23. Putnam, H. (1970). "Is Semantics Possible?" In Kiefer, H. and Munitz, M., eds., Language, Belief, and Metaphysics. SUNY Press.
24. Recanati, F. (1993). Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Blackwell.
25. Rips, L. J. (1995). "The Current Status of Research on Concept Combination." Mind and Language 10: 72-104.
26. Rosch, E. and Mervis. C. B. (1975). "Family Resemblance: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories." Cognitive Psychology 7: 573-605.
27. Smith, E. E. et al. (1988). "Combining Prototypes: A Selective Modification Model." Cognitive Science 12: 485-527.
28. Smith, E. E. and Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and Concepts. Harvard University Press.