Project teaming: Knowledge-intensive design for composing team members

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 9479-9487

  Chi, Yu Liang ^a   Chen, Chung Yang ^b  

^a CHUNG YUAN CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b NATIONAL CENTRAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Knowledge based system; Ontology; Project management; Rule; Teaming

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION THEORY; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT;

COLLABORATIVE ENVIRONMENTS; COMBINING RULES; CREATION PROCESS; INDIVIDUAL SKILLS; KNOWLEDGE BASIS; KNOWLEDGE-BASE; KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEM; LOGIC RULES; PROJECT TEAMING; PROJECT TEAMS; RULE; RUN-TIME; SEMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS; SYSTEM RELIABILITIES; TEAM COMPOSITIONS; TEAM MEMBERS; TEAMING;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 60849133304     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.12.015     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Beranek G., Zuser W., and Grechenig T. Functional group roles in software engineering teams. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 30 4 (2005) 1-7
2. Berners-Lee T., Hendler J., and Lassila O. The semantic web. Scientific American 284 5 (2001) 34-43
3. Campion M.A., Popper E.M., and Medsker G.J. Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology 49 (1996) 429-452
4. Ceschi M., Sillitti A., Succi G., and DePanfilis S. Project management in plan-based and agile companies. IEEE Software 22 3 (2005) 21-27
5. Chen S.J., and Lin L. Modeling team member characteristics for the formation of a multifunctional team in concurrent engineering. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 51 2 (2004) 111-124
6. Chi Y.-L. Elicitation synergy of extracting conceptual tags and hierarchies in textual document. Expert Systems with Applications 32 2 (2007) 349-357
7. Chi Y.-L. A consumer-centric design approach to develop comprehensive knowledge-based systems for keyword discovery. Expert Systems with Applications 36 2P1 (2008) 2481-2493
8. Coates G., Duffy A.H.B., Hills W., and Whitfield R.I. A preliminary approach for modeling and planning the composition of engineering project teams. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers 221 7 (2007) 1255-1265
9. Crocitto M., and Youssef M. The human side of organizational agility. Industrial Management and Data Systems 103 6 (2003) 388-397
10. Golbreich C. Combining rule and ontology reasoners for the semantic web. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3323 (2004) 6-22
11. Gorla N., and Lam Y.W. Who should work with whom: Building effective software project teams. Communications of the ACM 47 6 (2004) 79-82
12. Guarino N. Formal ontology, conceptual analysis and knowledge representation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 43 5-6 (1995) 625-640
13. Guarino N. Understanding, building and using ontologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 46 2-3 (1997) 293-310
14. Hollenbeck J.R., DeRue D.S., and Guzzo R. Bridging the gap between I/O research and HR practice: Improving team composition, team training, and team task design. Human Resource Management 43 4 (2004) 353-366
15. Hong P., Nahm A.Y., and Doll W.J. The role of project target clarity in an uncertain project environment. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 24 12 (2004) 1269-1291
16. Horrocks I., and Patel-Schneider P.F. Reducing OWL entailment to description logic satisfiability. Journal of Web Semantics 1 4 (2004) 345-357
17. Horrocks I., Patel-Schneider P.F., and Harmelen F.V. From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: the making of a web ontology language. Journal of Web Semantics 1 1 (2003) 7-26
18. Horrocks I., Patel-Schneider P.F., Bechhofer S., and Tsarkov D. OWL rules: A proposal and prototype implementation. Journal of Web Semantics 3 1 (2005) 23-40
19. Hudson V.F. The human side. Industrial Engineer 39 9 (2007) 40-44
20. Johnson J. Turning chaos into success. Software Magazine 19 3 (1999) 30-39
21. Karakowsky L., McBey K., and Chuang Y.T. Perception of team performance, the impact of group composition and task-based cues. Journal of Managerial Psychology 19 5 (2004) 506-525
22. Kichuk S.L., and Wiesner W.H. The Big Five personality factors and team performance: Implications for selecting successful product design teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management 14 3 (1997) 195-221
23. Krishnan M.S. The role of team factors in software cost and quality: An empirical analysis. Information Technology and People 11 1 (1998) 20-35
24. LePine J.A., Hollenbeck J.R., Ilgen D.R., and Hedlund J. Effects of individual differences on the performance of hierarchical decision-making teams: Much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology 82 5 (1997) 803-811
25. Nah F.H., and Delgado S. Critical success factors for enterprise resources planning implementation and upgrade. The Journal of Computer Information Systems 46 5 (2006) 99-112
26. O'Connor M., Knublauch H., Tu S., Grosof B., Dean M., Grosso W., et al. Supporting rule system interoperability on the semantic web with SWRL. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3729 (2005) 974-986
27. Probert G. Projects, people, and practices. Engineering Management Journal 7 3 (1997) 141-146
28. Stewart G.L., Fulmer I.S., and Barrick M.R. An exploration of member roles as a multilevel linking mechanism for individual traits and team outcomes. Personnel Psychology 58 2 (2005) 343-365
29. Taggar S., and Haines III V.Y. I need you, you need me: A model of initiated task interdependence. Journal of Managerial Psychology 21 3 (2006) 211-230
30. Verville J., and Halingten A. The effect of team composition and group role definition on ERP acquisition decisions. Team Performance Management 9 5-6 (2003) 115-130
31. Wageman R. Interdependence and group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (1995) 145-180
32. White K. MIS project teams: An investigation of cognitive style implications. MIS Quarterly 8 2 (1984) 85-101