Generalized ensemble methods for de novo structure prediction

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 106, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 1415-1420

  Shmygelska, Alena ^a   Levitt, Michael ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Conformational search; Protein folding; Rosetta force field

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; ENERGY; HYDROGEN BOND; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

HYDROGEN BONDING; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

EID: 60849124513     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0812510106     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Simons K, Kooperberg C, Huang E, Baker D (1997) Assembly of protein tertiary structures from fragments with similar local sequences using simulated annealing and bayesian scoring function. J Mol Biol 268:209-225.
2. Bradley P, Misura K, Baker D (2005) Toward high-resolution de novo structure prediction for small proteins. Science 309:1868-1871.
3. Schueler-Furman O, Wang C, Bradley P, Misura K, Baker D (2005) Progress in modeling of protein structures and interactions. Science 310:638-642.
4. Zhang Y, Arakaki AK, Skolnick J (2005) TASSER: An automated method for the prediction of protein tertiary structures in CASP6. Proteins Suppl 7:91-108.
5. Ortiz AR, Kolinski A, Rotkiewicz P, Ilkowski B, Skolnick J (1999) Ab initio folding of proteins using restrains derived from evolutionary information. Proteins Suppl 3:177-185.
6. Zhang Y, Kihara D, Skolnick J (2002) Local energy landscape flattening: Parallel hyperbolic monte carlo sampling of protein folding. Proteins 48:192-201.
7. Swendsen RH, Wang JS (1986) Replica Monte Carlo simulation of spin-glasses. Phys Rev Lett 57:2607-2609.
8. Okamoto Y (2004) Generalized-ensemble algorithms: Enhanced sampling techniques for Monte Carlo and molecular dynamic simulations. JMol Graphics Model 22:425-439.
9. Hansmann UHE (1999) Protein folding simulations in a deformed energy landscape. Eur Phys JB 12:607-611.
10. Fukunishi H, Watanabe O, Takada S (2002) On the Hamiltonian replica exchange method for efficient sampling, of biomolecular systems: Application to protein structure prediction. J Chem Phys 116:9058-9067.
11. Liu P, Kim B, Friesner RA, Berne BJ (2005) Replica exchange with solute tempering: A method for sampling biological systems in explicit water. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:13749-13754.
12. Das R, Baker D (2008) Macromolecular modeling with Rosetta. Annu Rev Biochem 77:363-382.
13. Misura KMS, Baker D (2005) Progressand challenges in high-resolution refinement of protein structure models. Proteins 59:15-29.
14. Jagielska A, Wroblewska L, Skolnick J (2008) Protein model refinement using an optimized physics-based all-atom force field. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:8268-8273.
15. Rohl CA, Strauss CEM, Misura KMS, Baker D (2004) Protein structure prediction using Rosetta. Methods Enzymol 383:66-93.
16. Zemla A (2003) LGA: A method for finding 3D similarities in protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3370-3374.
17. Shortle D, Simons K, Baker D (1998) Clustering of low-energy conformations near the native structures of small proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:11158-11162.
18. Das R, et al. (2007) Structure prediction for CASP7 targets using extensive all-atom refinement with Rosetta@home. Proteins 69(Suppl 8):118-128.
19. Huang ES, Subbiah S, Tsai J, Levitt M (1996) Using a hydrophobic contact potential to evaluate native and near-native folds generated by molecular dynamics simulations. J Mol Biol 257(33):716-725.
20. Park B, Levitt M (1996) Energy functions that discriminate x-ray and near-native folds from well-constructed decoys. J Mol Biol 258:367-392.
21. Kortemme, T., Morozov AV, Baker D (2003) An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. J Mol Biol 326:1239-1259.
22. Morozov AV, Kortemme T, Tsemekhman K, Baker D (2004) Close agreement between the orientation dependence of hydrogen bonds observed in protein structures and quantum mechanical calculations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:6946-6951.
23. Zhu J, Fan H, Periole X, Honig B, Mark AE (2008) Refining homology models by combining replica-exchange molecular dynamics and statistical potentials. Proteins 72:1171-1188.
24. Murzin A, Brenner SE, Hubbard TJP, Chothia C (1995) SCOP: A structural classification of proteins database for the investigation of sequences and structures. J Mol Biol 247:536-540.
25. Newman MEJ, Barkma G.T (1999) Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics (Clarendon, Oxford).