Responsiveness of the activities of daily living scale of the knee outcome survey and numeric pain rating scale in patients with patellofemoral pain

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 129-135

  Piva, Sara R ^a   Gil, Alexandra B ^a   Moore, Charity G ^b   Fitzgerald, G Kelley ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Area under the curve; Knee; Minimum clinical important difference; Standardized effect size

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EFFECT SIZE; EXTERNAL RESPONSIVENESS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERNAL RESPONSIVENESS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCLE EXERCISE; MUSCLE TRAINING; NUMERIC PAIN RATING SCALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN SYNDROME; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; SCHOOL CHILD; SEX DIFFERENCE; STANDARDIZATION; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; KNEE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KNEE; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATELLOFEMORAL PAIN SYNDROME; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 60749129455     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0295     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Insall J. Current concepts review: patella pain. J Bone Joint Surg 1982; 64A: 147-152.
2. Brody LT, Thein JM. Nonoperative treatment for patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1998; 28: 336-344.
3. Thomee R, Augustsson J, Karlsson J. Patellofemoral pain syndrome: a review of current issues. Sports Med 1999; 28: 245-262.
4. Katz J, Melzack R. Measurement of pain. Surg Clin North Am 1999; 79: 231-252.
5. Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM. What is the maximum number of levels needed in pain intensity measurement? Pain 1994; 58: 387-392.
6. Stewart M, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Bogduk N, Nicholas M. Responsiveness of pain and disability measures for chronic whiplash. Spine 2007; 32: 580-585.
7. Irrgang JJ, Snyder-Mackler L, Wainner RS, Fu FH, Harner CD. Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 1132-1145.
8. Marx RG, Jones EC, Allen AA, Altchek DW, O'Brien SJ, Rodeo SA, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of four knee outcome scales for athletic patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001; 83-A: 1459-1469.
9. Gerbino PG, Griffin ED, d'Hemecourt PA, Kim T, Kocher MS, Zurakowski D, et al. Patellofemoral pain syndrome: evaluation of location and intensity of pain. Clin J Pain 2006; 22: 154-159.
10. Wilson T, Carter N, Thomas G. A multicenter, single-masked study of medial, neutral, and lateral patellar taping in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2003; 33: 437-443; discussion 444-448.
11. Piva SR, Goodnite E, Childs JD. Strength around the hip and flexibility of soft tissues in individuals with and without patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005; 35: 793-801.
12. Karataglis D, Green MA, Learmonth DJ. Functional outcome following modified Elmslie-Trillat procedure. Knee 2006; 13: 464-468.
13. Beaton DE. Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness. Spine 2000; 25: 3192-3199.
14. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 171-178.
15. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 459-468.
16. Lydick E, Epstein RS. Interpretation of quality of life changes. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 221-226.
17. Wyrwich KW, Wolinsky FD. Identifying meaningful intra-individual change standards for health-related quality of life measures. J Eval Clin Pract 2000; 6: 39-49.
18. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989; 10: 407-415.
19. Salsich GB, Brechter JH, Farwell D, Powers CM. The effects of patellar taping on knee kinetics, kinematics, and vastus lateralis muscle activity during stair ambulation in individuals with patellofemoral pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2002; 32: 3-10.
20. Witvrouw E, Lysens R, Bellemans J, Peers K, Vanderstraeten G. Open versus closed kinetic chain exercises for patellofemoral pain. A prospective, randomized study. Am J Sports Med 2000; 28: 687-694.
21. McConnell J. The management of chondromalaciae patellae: a long-term solution. Aust J Physiother 1986; 32: 215-233.
22. McMullen W, Roncarati A, Koval P. Static and isokinetic treatments of chondromalacia patella: A comparative investigation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1990; 12: 256-266.
23. Stiene HA, Brosky T, Reinking ME, Nyland J, Mason MB. A comparison of closed kinetic chain and isokinetic joint isolation exercise in patients with patellofemoral dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1996; 24: 136-141.
24. Goldsmith CH, Boers M, Bombardier C, Tugwell P. Criteria for clinically important changes in outcomes: development, scoring and evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patient and trial profiles. OMERACT Committee. J Rheumatol 1993; 20: 561-565.
25. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Willan A, Griffith LE. Determining a minimal important change in a disease-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire. J Clin Epidemiol 1994; 47: 81-87.
26. Childs JD, Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine 2005; 30: 1331-1334.
27. Walsh TL, Hanscom B, Lurie JD, Weinstein JN. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36. Spine 2003; 28: 607-615.
28. Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1989; 27 Suppl 3: S178-S189.
29. Deyo RA, Centor RM. Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance. J Chronic Dis 1986; 39: 897-906.
30. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, editors. Applied logistic regression. 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2000.
31. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain 1996; 65: 71-76.
32. Grotle M, Brox JI, Vollestad NK. Concurrent comparison of responsiveness in pain and functional status measurements used for patients with low back pain. Spine 2004; 29: E492-E501.
33. Obuchowski NA. Receiving operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Radiology 2003; 229: 3-8.
34. Farrar JT, Young JP Jr, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole RM. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain 2001; 94: 149-158.
35. Wyrwich KW, Nienaber NA, Tierney WM, Wolinsky ED. Linking clinical relevance and statistical significance in evaluating intra-individual changes in health-related quality of life. Med Care 1999; 37: 469-478.
36. Haley S, Fragala-Pinkham M. Interpreting change scores of tests and measures used in physical therapy. Phys Ther 2006; 86: 735-743.
37. Wyrwich KW, Wolinsky FD. Identifying meaningful intra-individual change standards for health-related quality of life measures. J Eval Clin Pract 2000; 6: 39-49.
38. Altman DG, editor. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman and Hall; 1991.
39. Pett MA, editor. Nonparametric statistics for health care research. London: Sage Publications; 1997.