How do spatial spillovers diffuse in science–Industry interactions? The case of french biotech sector

Economics of Innovation and New Technology

Volumn 16, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 635-652

  Gallie, Emilie Pauline ^a,b   Legros, Diègo ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DAUPHINE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 1 PANTHÉON SORBONNE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PANTHÉON ASSAS   (France)

Author keywords

Asymptotic least squares; Biotechnologies; Cooperation; Spatial dimension; Spillovers

Indexed keywords

EID: 60749117369     PISSN: 10438599     EISSN: 14768364     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10438590600931928     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Acs, Z., Anselin, L., and Varga, A., 2002. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Research Policy, 31 (7): 1069–1085.
2. Adams, J. D., 2001. Comparative Localization of Academic and Industrial Spillovers. NBER Working Paper Series, 8292
3. Aharonson, B. S., Baum, J. A.C., and Feldman, M. P., 2004. “ Industrial Clustering and the Returns to Inventive Activity: Canadian Biotechnology Firms, 1991–2000 ”. Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics Working Paper, 04-03.
4. Almedia, P., and Kogut, B., 1999. Localizations of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Management Science, 45 (7): 905–918.
5. Anselin, L., Varga, A., and Acs, Z., 1997. Local Geographic Spillovers Between University Research and High Technology Innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 42 (3): 422–448.
6. D'aspremont, C., and Jacquemin, A., 1988. Cooperative and Noncooperative R&D in Duopoly with Spillovers. American Economic Review, 78 (5): 1133–1137.
7. Autant-Bernard, C., 2000. Géographie de l'innovation et externalités locales de connaissances. Une étude sur données françaises, 344Saint-Etienne: Université Jean Monnet. Thèse pour le doctorat en sciences économiques
8. Autant-Bernard, C., 2001a. The Geography of Knowledge Spillovers and Technological Proximity. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 10 (4): 237–254.
9. Autant-Bernard, C., 2001b. Science and Knowledge Flows: Evidence From the French Case. Research Policy, 30 (7): 1069–1078.
10. Autant-Bernard, C., and Massard, N., 2004. “ Disparités locales dans la production d'innovation: l'indice du choix des indicateurs ”. 4 éme Journées de la Proximité, Proximité, réseau et coopération, Marseille, 17–18 Juin
11. Beise, M., and Stahl, H., 1999. Public Research and Industrial Innovations in Germany. Research Policy, 28: 397–422.
12. Carrincazeaux, C., Lung, Y., and Rallet, A., 2001. Proximity and Localisation of Corporate R&D Activities. Research Policy, 30 (5): 777–789.
13. Cockburn, I., and Henderson, R., 1998. Absorptive Capacity, Co-authoring Behavior, and the Organization of Research in Drug Discovery. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46 (2): 157–181.
14. Cohen, W., Florida, R., and Goe, W. R., 1994. “ University–industry Research Centers in the United States ”. Carnegie Mellon University. Report to the Ford Foundation
15. Cowan, R., David, P. A., and Foray, D., 2000. The Explicit Economics of Knowledge Codification and Tacitness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9 (2): 211–253.
16. Crépon, B., Duguet, E., and Mairesse, J., 1998. “ Research, Innovation and Productivity: an Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level ”. NBER Working Paper Series, 6696
17. Di Gregorio, D., and Shane, S., 2003. Why Do Some Universities Generate More Start-ups Than Others?. Research Policy, 32 (2): 209–227.
18. Dosi, G., 1988. Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation. Journal of Economic Literature, 26 (3): 1120–1171.
19. Duguet, E., and Kabla, I., 1998. Appropriation Strategy and the Motivations to Use the Patent System: an Econometric Analysis at the Firm level in French Manufacturing. Annales d'Economie et de Statistique (49–50),: 289–327.
20. Duguet, E., and Simmonet, V., 2003. La participation des couples au marché du travail: Une analyse économétrique. Journées de Microéconomie appliquées,: 32 5–6 juin
21. Ernst and Young. 2001. “ Biotech Reports ”. London
22. Feldman, M., 1994. The Geography of Innovation, 154Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
23. Foray, D., 2000. L'économie de la connaissance, Paris: La Découverte, Repére.
24. Fritsch, M., and Franke, G., 2004. Innovation, Regional Knowledge Spillovers and R&D Cooperation. Research Policy, 33 (2): 245–255.
25. Gallié, E.-P., 2004. “ Coopération, externalités de connaissance et géography de l'innovation: Le cas du secteur des biotechnologies en France ”. Université Paris 1. Thèse pour le doctorat en sciences Economiques
26. Gallié, E.-P., 2005. Diffusion et dimension spatiale des spillovers au sein des réseaux de recherche publics: le cas du secteur des biotechnologies en France. Revue d'Economie Régionale et Urbaine,: 193–216. mai, n°2
27. Griliches, Z., 1979. Issues in Assessing the Contribution of R&D to Productivity Growth. The Bell Journal of Economics, 10: 92–116.
28. èmes Journées de la Proximité Toulouse 19–20 mai
29. Jaffe, A. B., 1989. The Real Effects of Academic Research. The American Economic Review, 79 (5): 957–970.
30. Kline, S. J., and Rosenberg, N., 1986. “ An Overview of Innovation ”. In The Positive Sum Strategy: Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth, Edited by: Landau, R., and Rosenberg, N., Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
31. Lee, Y.-S., 2000. The Sustainability of University–industry Research Collaboration: an Empirical Assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25 (2): 111–133.
32. Lucas, R. E., 1988. On the Mechanics of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22 (1): 3–42.
33. Macpherson, A., 2002. The Contribution of Academic–industry Interaction to Product Innovation: the Case of New York State's Medical Devices Sector. Papers in Regional Science, 81 (1): 121–129.
34. Mangematin, V., 2001. Les docteurs, producteurs et diffuseurs de connaissances. Encyclopédie de l'innovation
35. Mansfield, E., 1995. Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovation: Sources, Characteristics and Financing. Review ofEconomics and Statistics, 77 (1): 55–65.
36. Mansfield, E., and Lee, J.-Y., 1996. The Modern University: Contributor to Industrial Innovation and Recipient of Industrial R&D Support. Research Policy, 25 (7): 1047–1058.
37. Massard, N., 2001. “ Externalités de connaissances et géographie de linnovation: les enseignements des études empiriques ”. In Séminaire d'experts sur l'économie de la connaissance 19 Commissariat Général du Plan, 7 février
38. Mcmillan, G. S., Narin, F., and Deeds, D. L., 2000. An Analysis of the Critical Role of Public Science in Innovation: the Case of Biotechnology. Research Policy, 29 (1): 1–8.
39. Meyer-Krahmer, F., and Schmoch, U., 1998. Science-based Technologies: University–industry Interactions in Four Fields. Research Policy, 27 (8): 835–851.
40. Pavitt, K., 1998. Technologies, Products and Organisation in the Innovating Firm: What Adam Smith Tells us and Joseph Schumpeter Doesn't. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7: 433–452.
41. Rallet, A., and Torre, A., 2001. Proximité géographique ou proximité organisationnelle? Une analyse spatiale des coopérations technologiques dans les réseaux localisés d'innovation. Economie Appliqúee, 54 (1): 147–171.
42. Romer, P. M., 1990. Endogeneous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5, part 2): 71–102.
43. Senker, J., 1998. Biotechnology and Competitive Advantage, Edward Elgar.
44. Veugelers, R., and De Backer, K., 1999. “ Access to External Knowledge: an Empirical Analysis of Alliances as Spillover Channel ”. KULeuven, Onderzoeksrapport, DTEW, 9921
45. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., and Amstrong, J., 1994. “ Intellectual Capital and the Firm: the Technology of Geographically Localized Knowledge Spillovers ”. NBER Working Paper Series, 4946
46. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., and Armstrong, J., 2002. Commercializing Knowledge: University Science, Knowledge Capture, and Firm Performance in Biotechnology. Management Science, n°48 (1): 138–153.