Predicting algorithm accuracy with a small set of effective meta-features

Proceedings - 7th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, ICMLA 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 808-812

  Lee, Jun Won ^a   Giraud Carrier, Christophe ^a  

^a 3361 TMCB   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; EDUCATION; ROBOT LEARNING;

CLASSIFICATION TASKS; DATA-SETS; DISCRETIZATION; META-FEATURES; META-LEARNING; MODEL SELECTIONS; PREDICTIVE ACCURACIES; VISUAL ANALYSIS;

LEARNING ALGORITHMS;

EID: 60649107317     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICMLA.2008.62     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. S. Ali and K. Smith. On learning algorithm selection for classification. Applied Soft Computing, 6 (2): 119-138, 2006.
2. A. Asuncion and D. Newman. UCI machine learning repository, 2007.
3. H. Bcnsusan, C. Giraud-Carrier, and C. Kennedy. A higherorder approach to mela-learning. In Proceedings of the ECML Workshop on Meta-learning: Building Automatic Advice Strategies for Model Selection and Method Combination, pages 109-118, 2000.
4. H. Bensusan and A. Kalousis. Estimating the predictive accuracy of a classifier. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Machine Learning, pages 25-36, 2001.
5. H. Blockeel and J. Vanschoren. Experiment databases: Towards an improved experimental methodology in machine learning. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases (LNCS 4702), pages 6-17, 2007.
6. P. Brazdil and R. Henery. Analysis of results. In D. Michie, D. Spiegclhaltcr, and C. Taylor, editors, Machine Learning, Neural and Statistical Classification, chapter 10. Ellis Horwood, New York, 1994.
7. P. Brazdil, C. Soares, and J. Pinto da Costa. Ranking learning algorithms: Using ibl and meta-learning on accuracy and time results. Machine Learning, 50 (3):251-277. 2003.
8. J. Gama and P. Brazdil. Characterization of classification algorithms. In Proceedings of the 7th Portugese Conference in AI, pages 83-102, 1995.
9. METAL: A meta-learning assistant for providing user support in machine learning and data mining. ESPRIT Framework IV LTR Reactive Project Nr. 26.357, 1998-2001.
10. D. Michie, D. Spiegelhalter, and C. Taylor, editors. Machine Learning, Neural and Statistical Classification. Ellis Horwood, 1994.
11. Y. Peng, P. Flach, P. Brazdil, and C. Soares. Improved data set characterisation for meta-learning. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Discovery Science, pages 141-152, 2002.
12. B. Pfahringer, H. Bensusan, and C. Giraud-Carrier. Metalearning by landmarking various learning algorithms. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-2000), pages 743-750, 2000.
13. K. Smith, F. Woo, V. Ciesielski, and R. Ibrahim. Matching data mining algorithm suitability to data characteristics using a self-organizing map. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Hybrid Intelligent Systems, pages 169-179, 2001.
14. K. Smith-Miles. Cross-disciplinary perspectives on metalearning for algorithm selection. ACM Computing Surveys, 2008.
15. S. Sohn. Meta analysis of classification algorithms for pattern recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21 (11):1137-1144, 1999.
16. D. Wolpert. The supervised learning no-free-lunch theorems. In Proceedings of the 6th On-line World Conference on Soft Computing in Industrial Applications, pages 325-330, 2001.
17. D. Wolpert and W. Macrcady. No free lunch theorems for search. Technical Report SFI-TR-95-02-010, Santa Fe Institute, 1995.