Effect of verbal aggressiveness on the perceived importance of secondary goals in messages

Communication Studies

Volumn 55, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 168-184

  Meyer, Janet R ^a  

^a KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60649096366     PISSN: 10510974     EISSN: 17451035     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10510970409388611     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Applegate, J. L., and Woods, E., 1991. Construct system development and attention to face wants in persuasive situations. The Southern Communication Journal, 56: 194–204.
2. Allen, M., Hample, D., and Preiss, R., Argumentativeness: Understanding the communication profile using meta-analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association. Washington, D.C. May.
3. Berger, C. R., 1997. Planning strategic interaction: Attaining goals through communicative action, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Boster, F. J., and Levine, T. R., 1988. Individual differences and compliance-gaining message selection: The effects of verbal aggressiveness, argumentativeness, dogmatism, and negativism. Communication Research Reports, 5: 114–119.
5. Brown, P., and Levinson, S. C., 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Burleson, B. R., and Caplan, S. E., 1998. “ Cognitive complexity ”. In Communication and personality: Trait perspectives, Edited by: McCroskey, J. C., Daly, J. A., Martin, M. M., and Beatty, M. J., 233–286. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
7. Craig, R. T., Tracy, K., and Spisak, F., 1986. The discourse of requests: Assessment of a politeness approach. Human Communication Research, 12: 437–468.
8. Dillard, J. P., and Burgoon, M., 1985. Situational influences on the selection of compliance-gaining messages: Two tests of the predictive utility of the Cody-McLaughlin typology. Communication Monographs, 52: 289–304.
9. Dillard, J. P., Segrin, C., and Harden, J. M., 1989. Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. Communication Monographs, 56: 19–38.
10. Hamilton, M. A., and Mineo, P. J., 2002. “ Argumentativeness and its effect on verbal aggressiveness: A meta-analytic review ”. In Interpersonal communication research: Advances through meta-analysis, Edited by: Allen, M., Preiss, R. W., Gayle, B. M., and Burrell, N., Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Hample, D., and Dallinger, J. M., 1987. Individual differences in cognitive editing standards. Human Communication Research, 14: 123–144.
12. Higgins, E. T., 1989. “ Knowledge accessibility and activation: Subjectivity and suffering from unconscious sources ”. In Unintended thought, Edited by: Uleman, J. S., and Bargh, J. A., 75–123. New York: Guilford Press.
13. Hunter, J. E., and Schmidt, F. L., 1990. Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
14. Infante, D. A., Chandler, T. A., and Rudd, J. E., 1989. Test of an argumentative skill deficiency model of interspousal violence. Communication Monographs, 56: 163–177.
15. Infante, D. A., and Gorden, W. I., 1991. How employees see the boss: Test of an argumentative and affirming model of superiors’ communicative behavior. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55: 294–304.
16. Infante, D. A., Myers, S. A., and Burkel, R. A., 1994. Argument and verbal aggression in constructive and destructive family and organizational disagreements. Western Journal of Communication, 58: 73–84.
17. Infante, D. A., and Rancer, A. S., 1996. “ Argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness: A review of recent theory and research ”. In Communication Yearbook, Edited by: Burleson, B. R., Vol. 19, 319–351. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Infante, D. A., Riddle, B. L., Horvath, C. L., and Tumlin, S. A., 1992. Verbal aggressiveness: Messages and reasons. Communication Quarterly, 40: 116–126.
19. Infante, D. A., and Wigley, C. J., 1986. Verbal aggressiveness: An interpersonal model and measure. Communication Monographs, 53: 61–69.
20. Jordan, J. M., and Roloff, M. E., 1997. Planning skills and negotiator goal accomplishment: The relationship between self-monitoring and plan generation, plan enactment, and plan consequences. Communication Research, 24: 31–63.
21. Magnusson, D., and Endler, N. S., eds. 1977. Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22. Marwell, G., and Schmitt, D. R., 1967. Dimensions of compliance-gaining behavior: An empirical analysis. Sociometry, 30: 350–364.
23. Meyer, J. R., 1997. “ Cognitive influences on the ability to address interaction goals ”. In Message production: Advances in communication theory, Edited by: Greene, J. O., 71–90. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Meyer, J. R., Effects of secondary goal importance and individual differences on the anticipation of unwanted message outcomes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association. San Francisco. May.
25. Meyer, J. R., 2000. Cognitive models of message production: Unanswered questions. Communication Theory, 10(2): 176–187.
26. Meyer, J. R., 2001. Pursuing relational goals in requests: The effects of dispositional factors and type of relationship. Southern Communication Journal, 67(1): 51–65.
27. Payne, M. J., and Sabourin, T. C., 1990. Argumentative skill deficiency and its relationship to quality of marriage. Communication Research Reports, 7: 121–124.
28. Sabourin, T. C., Infante, D. A., and Rudd, J. E., 1993. Verbal aggression in marriages: A comparison of violent, distressed but nonviolent, and nondistressed couples. Human Communication Research, 20: 245–267.
29. Srull, T. K., and Wyer, R. S., 1986. “ The role of chronic and temporary goals in social information processing ”. In Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, Edited by: Sorrentino, R. M., and Higgins, E. T., 503–549. New York: Guilford.
30. Wigley, C. J., Pohl, G. H., and Watt, M. G. S., 1989. Conversational sensitivity as a correlate of trait verbal aggressiveness and the predisposition to verbally praise others. Communication Reports, 2: 92–95.
31. Wilson, S. R., 1990. Development and test of a cognitive rules model of interaction goals. Communication Monographs, 57: 81–103.
32. Wilson, S. R., 1995. “ Elaborating the cognitive rules model of interaction goals: The problem of accounting for individual differences in goal formation ”. In Communication Yearbook, Edited by: Burleson, B., Vol. 18, 3–25. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Wilson, S. R., Aleman, C. G., and Leatham, G. B., 1998. Identity implications of influence goals: A revised analysis of face-threatening acts and application to seeking compliance with same-sex friends. Human Communication Research, 25: 64–96.