Are two heads better than one for software development? The productivity paradox of pair programming

MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 91-118

  Balijepally, VenuGopal ^a   Mahapatra, RadhaKanta ^b   Nerur, Sridhar ^b   Price, Kenneth H ^b  

^a PRAIRIE VIEW A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Agile methodology; Assembly bonus effect; Group problem solving; Nominal group; Pair programming; Software development; Team performance

Indexed keywords

MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

AGILE METHODOLOGIES; CONTROLLED LABORATORIES; EXTREME PROGRAMMING; NOMINAL GROUP; PAIR-PROGRAMMING; PRODUCTIVITY PARADOX; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGIES; TEAM PERFORMANCE;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 60649093502     PISSN: 02767783     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/20650280     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Aiello, J. R., and Douthitt, E. A. 2001. "Social Facilitation from Triple« to Electronic Performance Monitoring," Group Dynamics (5:3), pp. 163-180.
2. Ambler, S. 2007. "Survey Says...Agile Has Crossed the Chasm," Dr. Dobb's Portal: Architecture & Design, July 2 (http://www.ddj.com/ architect/200001986).
3. Arisholm, E., Gallis, H., Dybå, T., and Sjeberg, D. I. K. 2007. "Evaluating Pair Programming with Respect to System Complexity and Programmer Expertise," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (33:2), pp. 65-86.
4. Baheti, P., Gehringer, E., and Stotts, D. 2002. "Exploring the Efficacy of Distributed Pair Programming," in Extreme Programming and Agile Methods - XP/Agile Universe 2002, D. Wells and L. Williams (eds.), Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 208-220.
5. Beck, K. 1999. "Embracing Change with Extreme Programming," IEEE Computer (32:10), pp. 70-77.
6. Beck, K. 2000. Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
7. Bhattacherjee, A. 2001. "Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model," MIS Quarterly (25:3), pp. 351-370.
8. Bodart, F., Patel, A., Sim, M., and Weber, R. 2001. "Should Optional Properties Be Used in Conceptual Modeling? A Theory and Three Empirical Tests," Information Systems Research (12:4), pp. 384-405.
9. Boland, R. J., and Tenkasi, R. V. 1995. "Perspective Making and Perspective Taking in Communities of Knowing," Organization Science (6:4), pp. 350-372.
10. Bonner, B. L. 2004. "Expertise in Group Problem Solving: Recognition, Social Combination, and Performance," Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice (8:4), pp. 277-290.
11. Bonner, B. L., Baumann, M. R., and Dalal, R. S. 2002. "The Effects of Member Expertise on Group Decision-Making and Performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (88:2), pp. 719-736.
12. Brewer, M. B., and Kramer, R. M. 1986. "Choice Behavior in Social Dilemmas: Effects of Social Identity, Group Size, and Decision Framing," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (50:3), pp. 543-549.
13. Brickner, M. A., Harkins, S. G., and Ostrom, T. M. 1986. "Effects of Personal Involvement: Thought-Provoking Implications for Social Loafing," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (51), pp. 763-770.
14. Bystrom, K., and Jarvelin, K. 1995. "Task Complexity Affects Information-Seeking and Use," Information Processing & Management (31:2), pp. 191-213.
15. Campbell, D. J. 1988. "Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis," Academy of Management Review (13:1), pp. 40-52.
16. Canfora, G., Cimitile, A., Garcia, F., Piattini, M., and Visaggio, C. A. 2007. "Evaluating Performances of Pair Designing in Industry," Journal of Systems and Software (80:8), pp. 1317-1327.
17. Canfora, G., Cimitile, A., and Visaggio, C. A. 2005. "Empirical Study on the Productivity of the Pair Programming," in Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, H. Baumeister, M. Marchesi and M. Holcombe (eds.), Berlin: Springer, pp. 92-99.
18. th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
19. Cockburn, A. 2002. "Agile Software Development Joins the 'Would-Be' Crowd," Cutter IT Journal (15:1), pp. 6-12.
20. Cockburn, A., and Highsmith, J. 2001. "Agile Software Development 2: The People Factor," IEEE Computer (34:11), pp. 131-133.
21. Cockburn, A., and Williams, L. 2001. "The Costs and Benefits of Pair Programming," in Extreme Programming Examined, G. Succi and M. Marchesi (eds.), Boston: Addison Wesley, pp. 223-243.
22. Collins, B. E., and Guetzkow, H. G. 1964. Social Psychology of Group Processes for Decision-Making, New York: Wiley.
23. Dennis, A. R., and Valacich, J. S. 1993. "Computer Brainstorms: More Heads Are Better than One," Journal of Applied Psychology (78:4), pp. 531-537.
24. Diehl, M., and Stroebe, W. 1987. "Productivity Loss in IdeaGenerating Groups: Tracking Down the Blocking Effect," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (53:3), pp. 497-509.
25. Dybå, T., Arisholm, E., Sjøberg, D. I. K., Hannay, J. E., and Shull, F. "Are Two Heads Better than One? On the Effectiveness of Pair Programming," IEEE Software (24:6), pp. 12-15.
26. th Annual Workshop on Empirical Studies of Programmers, J. Koenemann-Belleveau, T. G. Moher, and S. P. Robertson (eds.), Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing, pp. 36-63.
27. Forsyth, D. R. 1999. Group Dynamics, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.
28. Fruhling, A., and de Vreede, G. 2006. "Field Experiences with eXtreme Programming: Developing an Emergency Response System," Journal of Management Information Systems (22:4), pp. 39-68.
29. Garibaldi, A. M. 1979. "Affective Contributions of Cooperative and Group Goal Structures," Journal of Educational Psychology (71:6), pp. 788-794.
30. Hackman, J. R. 1987. "The Design of Work Teams," in Handbook of Organizational Behavior, J. W. Lorsch (ed.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, pp. 315-342.
31. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., and Black, W. C. 1998. Multivariate Data Analysis, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
32. Harkins, S. G. 1987. "Social Loafing and Social Facilitation," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (23:11), pp. 1-18.
33. Harkins, S. G., and Petty, R. E. 1982. "Effects of Task Difficulty and Task Uniqueness on Social Loafing," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (43:6), pp. 1241-1229.
34. Heiberg, S., Puus, U., Salumaa, P., and Seeba, A. 2003. "Pair-Programming Effect on Developers Productivity," in Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, M. Marchesi and G. Succi (eds.), Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 215-224.
35. Highsmith, J., and Cockburn, A. 2001. "Agile Software Development 1 : The Business of Innovation," IEEE Computer (34:9), pp. 120-127.
36. Hill, G. W. 1982. "Group Versus Individual Performance: Are N + 1 Heads Better than One?," Psychological Bulletin (91:3), pp. 517-539.
37. Hinsz, V. B. 1995. "Goal Setting by Groups Performing an Additive Task: A Comparison with Individual Goal Setting," Journal of Applied Social Psychology (25:11), pp. 965-990.
38. Hinsz, V. B., and Nickell, G. S. 2004. "Positive Reactions to Working in Groups in a Study of Group and Individual Goal Decision Making," Group Dynamics (8:4), pp. 253-264.
39. Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., and Vollrath, D. A. 1997. "The Emerging Conceptualization of Groups as Information Processors," Psychological Bulletin (121:1), pp. 43-64.
40. th International Conference on Software Engineering, St. Louis, MO, pp. 495-504.
41. Ito, J. K., and Peterson, R. B. 1986. "Effects of Task Difficulty and Interunit Interdependence on Information Processing Systems," Academy of Management Journal (29:1), pp. 139-149.
42. ITPro. 2007. "IT Spending Growth Expected to Slow,"ITPro News Briefs, January/February, p. 7 (http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/mags/it/ 2007/01/f1006.pdf).
43. Jourden, F. J., and Heath, C. 1996. "The Evaluation Gap in Performance Perceptions: Illusory Perceptions of Groups and Individuals," Journal of Applied Psychology (81:4), pp. 369-379.
44. Karau, S. J., and Williams, K. D. 1993. "Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (65:4), pp. 681-706.
45. Kerr, N. L., and Tindale, R. S. 2004. "Group Performance and Decision Making," Annual Review of Psychology (55:1), pp. 623-655.
46. Khatri, V., Vessey, I., Ram, S., and Ramesh, V. 2006. "Cognitive Fit Between Conceptual Schemas and Internal Problem Representations: The Case of Geospatio-Temporal Conceptual Schema Comprehension," IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication (49:2), pp. 109-127.
47. Kumar, N., and Benbasat, I. 2004. "The Effect of Relationship Encoding, Task Type, and Complexity on Information Representation: An Empirical Evaluation of 2D and 3D Line Graphs," MIS Quarterly (28:2), pp. 255-281.
48. Latane, B., Williams, K. D., and Harkins, S. G. 1979. "Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (37:6), pp. 822-832.
49. Laughlin, P. R. 1980. "Social Combination Processes of Cooperative Problem-Solving Groups on Verbal Intellective Tasks," in Progress in Social Psychology, M. Fishbein (ed.), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 127-155.
50. Laughlin, P. R., Bonner, B. L., and Altermatt, T. W. 1998. "Collective Versus Individual Induction wth Single Versus Multiple Hypotheses," (75:6), pp. 1481-1489.
51. Laughlin, P. R., Bonner, B. L., and Miner, A. G. 2002. "Groups Perform Better than the Best Individuals on Letter-to-Numbers Problems," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (88:2), pp. 605-620.
52. Laughlin, P. R., and Ellis, A. L. 1986. "Demonstrability and Social Combination Processes on Mathematical Intellective Tasks," Journal of Experimental Social Psychology (22:3), pp. 177-189.
53. Laughlin, P. R., Gonzalez, C. M., and Sommer, D. 2003. "Quantity Estimations by Groups and Individuals: Effects of Known Domain Boundaries," Group Dynamics (7:1), pp. 55-63.
54. Laughlin, P. R., Hatch, E. C., Silver, J. S., and Boh, L. 2006. "Groups Perform Better Than the Best Individuals on Letters-to-Numbers Problems: Effects of Group Size," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (90:4), pp. 644-651.
55. Laughlin, P. R., VanderStoep, S. W., and Hollingshead, A. B. 1991. "Collective Versus Individual Induction: Recognition of Truth, Rejection of Error, and Collective Information Processing," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (61:1), pp. 50-67.
56. Laughlin, P. R., Zander, M. L., Knievel, E. M., and Tan, T. K. 2003. "Groups Perform Better Than the Best Individuals on Letters-to-Numbers Problems: Informative Equations and Effective Strategies," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (85:4), pp. 684-694.
57. Levine, J. M., and Moreland, R. L. 1998. "Small Groups," in Handbook of Social Psychology, D. T. Gilbert and S. T. Fiske (eds.), New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 415-469.
58. Lui, K. M., and Chan, K. C. C. 2005. "Pair Programming Productivity: Novice-Novice vs. Expert-Expert," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (64:9), pp. 915-925.
59. Madeyski, L. 2006. "The Impact of Pair Programming and Test-Driven Development on Package Dependencies in Object-Oriented Design - An Experiment," in Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, J. Munch and M. Vierimaa (eds.), Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 278-289.
60. Madeyski, L. 2007. "On the Effects of Pair Programming on Thoroughness and Fault-Finding Effectiveness of Unit Tests," in Product-Focused Software Process Improvement, J. Munch and P. Abrahamsson (eds.), Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, pp. 207-221.
61. Maslow, A. H. 1943. "A Theory of Human Motivation," Psychological Review (50:4), pp. 370-396.
62. McDowell, C., Werner, L., Bullock, H. E., and Fernald, J. 2006. "Pair Programming Improves Student Retention, Confidence, and Program Quality," Communications of the ACM (49:8), pp. 90-95.
63. McGrath, J. E. 1984. Groups: Interaction and Performance, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
64. Mullen, B., and Salas, J. C. 1991. "Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: A Meta-Analytic Integration," Basic Applied Social Psychology (12:1), pp. 3-23.
65. Müller, M. M. 2005. "Two Controlled Experiments Concerning the Comparison of Pair Programming to Peer Review," Journal of Systems and Software (78:2), pp. 166-179.
66. Müller, M. M. 2006. "A Preliminary Study on the Impact of a Pair Design Phase on Pair Programming and Solo Programming," Information and Software Technology (48:5), pp. 335-344.
67. th European Software Control and Metrics Conference, London, pp. 269-276.
68. Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., and Wasserman, W. 1996. Applied Linear Models, Chicago: Irwin, 1996.
69. Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. 1972. Human Problem Solving, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
70. Nixon, H. L. 1979. The Small Group, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
71. Nosek, J. T. 1998. "The Case for Collaborative Programming," Communications of the ACM (41:3), pp. 105-108.
72. Orr, K. 2002. "CMM Versus Agile Development: Religious Wars and Software Development," Agile Project Management Executive Report (3:7), Cutter Consortium, Arlington, MA.
73. Paulus, P. B., Dzindolet, M. T., Poletes, G., and Camacho, L. M. 1993. "Perception of Performance in Group Brainstorming: The Illusion of Group Productivity," Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin (19:1), pp. 78-89.
74. Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. G., Williams, K. D., and Latane, B. 1977. "The Effects of Group Size on Cognitive Effort and Evaluation," Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (3), pp. 575-578.
75. Phongpaibul, M., and Boehm, B. 2006. "An Empirical Comparison Between Pair Development and Software Inspection in Thailand," in Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, pp. 85-94.
76. Rostaher, M., and Hericko, M. 2002. "Tracking Test First Pair Programming - An Experiment," in Extreme Programming and Agile Methods - XP/Agile Universe 2002, D. Wells and L. Williams (eds.), Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, pp. 3-19.
77. Rubinstein, D. 2007. "Standish Group Report: There's Less Development Chaos Today," Software Development Times (http://www.sdtimes.com/content/article.aspx?ArticleID=30247).
78. Schroder, H., Driver, M., and Streufert, S. 1967. Human Information Processing, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
79. Simmel, G. (ed.). 1950. The Sociology of George Simmel, New York: The Free Press.
80. Sniezek, J. A. 1992. "Groups under Uncertainty: An Examination of Confidence in Group Decision Making," Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes (52:1), pp. 124-155.
81. Steiner, I. D. 1972. Group Process and Productivity, New York: Academic Press.
82. Stephenson, G. M., and Wagner, W. 1989. "Origins of the Misplaced Confidence Effect in Collaborative Recall," Applied Cognitive Psychology (3:3), pp. 227-236.
83. Vanhanen, J., and Lassenius, C. 2005. "Effects of Pair Programming at the Development Team Level: An Experiment," in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, Noosa, Australia, pp. 336-345.
84. Williams, K. D., Harkins, S. G., and Latane, B. 1981. "Identifiability as a Deterrent to Social Loafing: Two Cheering Experiments," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (40), pp. 303-311.
85. Williams, L. 2000. The Collaborative Software, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Utah.
86. Williams, L. A., and Kessler, R. R. 2000. "All I Really Need to Know About Pair Programming I Learned in Kindergarten," Communications of the ACM (43:5), pp. 108-114.
87. Williams, L. A., Kessler, R. R., Cunningham, W., and Jeffries, R. 2000. "Strengthening the Case for Pair Programming," IEEE Software (17:4), pp. 19-25.
88. th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Computer and Information Science, Honolulu, HI, pp. 500-505.
89. Zajonc, R. B. 1965. "Social Facilitation," Science (149), pp. 269-274.