Evaluating performances of pair designing in industry

Journal of Systems and Software

Volumn 80, Issue 8, 2007, Pages 1317-1327

  Canfora, Gerardo ^a   Cimitile, Aniello ^a   Garcia, Felix ^b   Piattini, Mario ^b   Visaggio, Corrado Aaron ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SANNIO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Empirical studies; Pair designing; Software engineering

Indexed keywords

ENCODING (SYMBOLS); SOFTWARE DESIGN; SOFTWARE TESTING; STATISTICAL METHODS;

EMPIRICAL STUDIES; PAIR PROGRAMMING; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; PRACTITIONERS;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING;

EID: 34248587890     PISSN: 01641212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Al-Kilidar H., Parkin P., Aurum A., and Jeffery R. Evaluation of effects of pair work on quality of designs. Proceedings of the 2005 Australian Software Engineering Conference (ASWEC 2005) Brisbane Australia (2005), IEEE CS Press 78-87
2. Baheti P., Gehringer E., and Stotts D. Exploring the efficacy of distributed pair programming. Proceedings of the Second XP Universe and First Agile Universe Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile Methods - XP/Agile Universe. LNCS vol. 2418 (2002), Springer pp. 208-220
3. Basili V., and Rombach H. The TAME project: towards improvement-oriented software environments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 14 6 (1988) 758-773
4. Basili V., Shull F., and Lanubile F. Building knowledge through families of experiments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 25 4 (1999) 456-473
5. Beck K. Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change (2000), Addison Wesley
6. Bellini E., Canfora G., García F., Piattini M., and Visaggio C.A. Pair designing as a practice for enforcing and diffusing design knowledge. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice 17 6 (2005) 401-423
7. Budgen D. Software Design. second ed. (2003), Pearson Educational Limite
8. Canfora, G., Cimitile, A., Visaggio, C.A., Garcia, F., Piattini, M., 2006. Performances of pair designing on software evolution: a controlled experiment. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering, CSMR 2006, 22-24 March, Bari, Italy, pp. 197-205.
9. Clements P., Kazman R., and Klein M. Evaluating Software Architectures: Methods and Case Studies (2002), Addison-Wesley
10. Cockburn A., and Highsmith J. Agile software development: the business of innovation. Computer 34 9 (2001) 120-123
11. Fenton N., and Pfleeger S.L. Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach. second ed. (1997), International Thomson Computer Press, London, UK
12. In: Genero M., Piattini M., and Calero C. (Eds). Metrics for Software Conceptual Models (2005), Imperial College Press
13. Ghezzi C., Jazazery M., and Mandrioli D. Fundamentals of Software Engineering. second ed. (2003), Prentice Hall
14. Heiberg, S., Puus, U., Salumaa, P., Seeba, 2003. A. Pair programming effect on developers productivity. In: Proceedings of Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, Italy, May 2003, pp. 215-224.
15. Host M., Regnell B., and Wohlin C. Using students as subjects - a comparative study of students and professionals. Lead-Time Impact Assessment Empirical Software Engineering vol. 5 (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers 201-214
16. Hulkko, H., Abrahamsson, P., 2005. A multiple case study on the impact of pair programming on product quality. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE'05), May 15-21, 2005, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, pp. 495-504.
17. Kitchenham B., Pfleeger S., Pickard L., Jones P., Hoaglin D., El Emam K., and Rosenberg J. Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28 8 (2002) 721-734
18. Lui K., and Chan K. When does a pair outperform two individuals?. Proceedings of XP 2003. LNCS (2003), Springer-Verlag 225-233
19. McDowell C., Werner L., Bullock H., and Fernald J. The effects of pair-programming on performance in an introductory programming course. Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (2002), ACM, Cincinnati, KY, USA 38-42
20. Mendes E., Al-Fakhri L.B., and Luxton-Reilly A. Investigating pair-programming in a 2nd-year software development and design computer science course. Proceedings of the 10th Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ItiCSE'05) (2005), ACM Press 296-300
21. Muller M. A preliminary study on the impact of a pair design phase on pair programming and solo programming. Information and Software Technology 48 (2006) 335-344
22. Nawrocki J., and Wojciechowski A. Experimental Evaluation of pair programming. Proceedings of the European Software Control and Metrics Conference (ESCOM 2001) (2001), ESCOM Press, 2001 269-276
23. Nosek J. The case for collaborative programing. Communication of ACM 41 3 (1998) 105-108
24. Rakitin S.R. Manifesto elicits cynism. Computer 34 12 (2001) 4
25. Reifer D.J. How good are agile methods?. IEEE Software 19 4 (2002) 16-19
26. Sjøberg D., Anda B., Arisholm E., Dybå T., Jørgensen M., Karahasanovic A., Koren E.F., and Vokác M. Conducting realistic experiments in software engineering. Proceedings of the 2002 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE'02) (2002), IEEE CS Press 17-26
27. Srikanth H., Williams L., Wiebe E., Miller C., and Balik S. On pair rotation in the computer science course. Proceedings of Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training 2004 (2004), IEEE CS Press, Norfolk, VA, USA 144-149
28. Succi, G., Marchesi, M., Pedrycz, W., Williams, L., 2002. Preliminary analysis of the effects of pair programming on job satisfaction. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on eXtreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software engineering (XP2002), pp. 212-215.
29. Williams L., and Kessler R.R. The Effects of "Pair Pressure" and "Pair-Learning" on software engineering education. Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Software Engineering and Education (CSEET 2000) (2000), IEEE CS Press 59-65
30. Williams L., and Kessler R.R. Experimenting with industry's pair programming model in the computer science classroom. Journal of Software Engineering Education 11 1 (2003) 7-20
31. Williams L., Kessler R.R., Cunningham W., and Jeffries R. Strengthening the case for pair programming. IEEE Software 17 4 (2000) 19-25
32. Wilson, J., Hoskin, N., Nosek, J., 1993. The benefits of collaboration for student programmers. In: Proceedings 24th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 160-164.
33. Wohlin C., Runeson P., Höst M., Ohlson M., Regnell B., and Wesslén A. Experimentation in Software Engineering: An Introduction (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers
34. Xu, S., Rajlich, V., 2005. Pair programming in graduate software engineering course projects. In: Proceedings of the 35th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Indianapolis (Indiana), October 19-22, F1G-7-F1G-12.