Discrete-choice experiment to measure patient preferences for the surgical management of colorectal cancer

British Journal of Surgery

Volumn 92, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 742-747

  Salkeld, G ^a,b,d   Solomon, M ^b   Butow, P ^b   Short, L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER RECURRENCE; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EDUCATION; EXPECTATION; FEMALE; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SURGEON; TRUST;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TRUST;

EID: 20844435757     PISSN: 00071323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4917     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Solomon M, Pager CK, Keshava A, Findlay M, Butow P, Salkeld GP et al. What do patients want? Patient preferences and surrogate decision making in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 1351-1357.
2. Gattellari M, Butow PN, Tattersall MHN. Sharing decisions in cancer care. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52: 1865-1878.
3. Beaver K, Bogg J, Luker KA. Decision-making role preferences and information needs: a comparison of colorectal and breast cancer. Health Expect 1999; 2: 266-276.
4. Khandker RK, Dulski JD, Kilpatrick JB, Ellis RP, Mitchell JB, Baine WB. A decision model and cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening and surveillance guidelines for average-risk adults. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000; 16: 799-810.
5. Sahay TB, Gray RE, Fitch M. A qualitative study of patient perspectives on colorectal cancer. Cancer Pract 2000; 8: 38-44.
6. Fallowfield LJ, Hall A, Maguire P, Baum M, A'Hern RP. A question of choice: results of a prospective 3-year follow-up study of women with breast cancer. Breast 1994; 3: 202-208.
7. Salkeld G, Solomon M, Short L, Butow PN. A matter of trust - patient's views on decision-making in colorectal cancer. Health Expect 2004; 7: 104-114.
8. Ryan M, Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. BMJ 2000; 320: 1530-1533.
9. Salkeld G, Solomon M, Short L, Ryan M, Ward JE. Evidence-based consumer choice: a case study in colorectal cancer screening. Aust N Z J Public Health 2003; 27: 449-455.
10. Ryan M. Economics and the patient's utility function: an application to assisted reproductive techniques. PhD Thesis. University of Aberdeen: Aberdeen, 1995.
11. Ryan M, Bate A, Eastmond CJ, Ludbrook A. Use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences. Qual Health Care 2001; 10(Suppl 1): i55-i60.
12. Shiell A, Hawe P, Seymour J. Values and preferences are not necessarily the same. Health Econ 1997; 6: 515-518.
13. Mann L, Burnett P, Radford M, Ford S. The Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire: an instrument for measuring patterns for coping with decisional conflict. J Behav Dec Making 1997; 10: 1-19.
14. Shiell A. Unquestioned answers: are health-related preferences complete? PhD Thesis. University of Sydney: Sydney, 2001.
15. Cairns J, van der Pol M, Lloyd A. Decision making heuristics and the elicitation of preferences: being fast and frugal about the future. Health Econ 2002; 11: 655-658.