PREP advertisement features affect smokers' beliefs regarding potential harm

Tobacco Control

Volumn 17, Issue SUPPL. 1, 2008, Pages

  Strasser, Andrew A ^a   Tang, K Z ^a   Tuller, M D ^a   Cappella, J N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERTIZING; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HARM REDUCTION; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SAFETY; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; STANDARD;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERTISING AS TOPIC; AGED; CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY; FEMALE; HARM REDUCTION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 60549104117     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tc.2007.022426     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Institute of Medicine. Clearing the smoke. Assessing the science base for tobacco harm reduction. Committee to Assess the Science Base for Tobacco Harm Reduction. Board on Health Promotion and Disease Prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
2. Stratton K, Shetty P, Wallace R, et al. Clearing the smoke: the science base for tobacco harm reduction - executive summary. Tob Control 2001;10:189-95. (Pubitemid 33720586)
3. Hamilton WL, Norton G, Ouellette TK, et al. Smokers' responses to advertisements for regular and light cigarettes and potential reduced-exposure tobacco products. Nicotine Tob Res 2004;6(S3):S353-62. (Pubitemid 40124774)
4. Shiffman S, Pillitteri JL, Burton SL, et al. Smoker and ex-smoker reactions to cigarettes claiming reduced risk. Tob Control 2004;13:78-84. (Pubitemid 39456648)
5. Shiffman S, Jarvis MJ, Pillitteri JL, et al. UK smokers' and ex-smokers' reactions to cigarettes promising reduced risk. Addiction 2007;102:156-60. (Pubitemid 46006481)
6. Strasser AA, Lerman C, Sanborn PM, et al. New lower nicotine cigarettes can produce compensatory smoking and increased carbon monoxide exposure. Drug Alcohol Depend 2007;86:294-300. (Pubitemid 44821611)
7. O'Connor RJ, Kozlowski LT, Hammond D, et al. Digital image analysis of cigarette filter staining to estimate smoke exposure. Nicotine Tob Res 2007;9:865-71. (Pubitemid 47190154)
8. Strasser AA, O'Connor RJ, Mooney ME, et al. Digital image analysis of cigarette filter stains as an indicator of compensatory smoking. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:2565-9. (Pubitemid 46055198)
9. Shadel WG, Lerman C, Cappella J, et al. Evaluating smokers' reactions to advertising for new lower nicotine Quest cigarettes. Psych Addict Behav 2006;20:80-4.
10. Anderson SJ, Pollay RW, Ling PM. Taking ad-Vantage of lax advertising regulation in the USA and Canada: reassuring and distracting health-concerned smokers. Soc Sci Med 2006;63:1973-85. (Pubitemid 44278352)
11. Pollay RW, Dewhirst T. The dark side of marketing seemingly "light" cigarettes: successful images and failed fact. Tob Control 2002;11(S1):18-31.
12. Philip Morris Co. Bates number: 2047387079, accessed 3 Sep 2007.
13. Philip Morris Co. Bates number 2048718182, accessed 3 Sep 2007.
14. Cohen J. Smokers' knowledge and understanding of advertised tar numbers: health policy implications. Am J Public Health 1996;86:18-24.
15. Canova D, Myers ML, Smith DE, et al. Changing the future of tobacco marketing by understanding the mistakes of the past: lessons from "lights". Tob Control 2001;10(S1):43-4.
16. Kozlowski LT, Pillitteri JL. Beliefs about "light" and "ultra-light" cigarettes and efforts to change those beliefs: an overview of early efforts and published research. Tob Control 2001;10(S1):12-6.
17. Shopland DR. Historical perspective: the low tar lie. Tob Control 2001;10(S1):1-3.
18. Giovino GA, Tomar SL, Reddy MN, et al. Attitudes, knowledge, and beliefs about low-yield cigarettes among adolescents and adults. The FTC cigarette test method for determining tar, nicotine, and carbon monoxide yields of US cigarettes: report of the NCI Expert Committee, 1996, Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health. (NIH Publication No 96-4028.)
19. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, et al. The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict 1991;86:1119-27.
20. Fishbein M, Triandis HC, Kanfer FH, et al. Factors influencing behavior and behavior change. In: Baum A, Revenson TA, Singer JE, eds. Handbook of health psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 2001:3-17.
21. Institute of Medicine. Ending the tobacco problem: a blueprint for the nation. Report Brief. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2007.
22. Kozlowski LT, Goldberg ME, Yost BA, et al. Smokers' misperceptions of light and ultra-light cigarettes may keep them smoking. Am J Prev Med 1998;5:9-16.
23. Fischer PM, Richards JW Jr, Berman EJ, et al. Recall and eye tracking study of adolescents viewing tobacco advertisements. JAMA 1989;261:84-9.
24. Stayman DM, Kardes FR. Spontaneous inference processes in advertising: effects of need for cognition and self-monitoring on inference generation and utilization. J Consumer Psychol 1992;1:125-42.
25. Kardes FR. Spontaneous inference processes in advertising: the effects of conclusion omission and involvement on persuasion. J Consumer Res 1988;15:225-33.
26. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT, Schumann D. Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. J Consumer Res 1983;10:135-46.
27. Hammond D, Fong GT, Borland R, et al. Text and graphic warnings on cigarette packages: Findings from the international tobacco control four country study. Am J Prev Med 2007;32:202-9.
28. Peters E, Romer D, Slovic P, et al. The impact and acceptability of Canadian-style cigarette warning labels among US smokers and nonsmokers. Nicotine Tob Res 2007;9:473-81.
29. Hammond D, Fong GT, McDonald PW, et al. Imapct of graphic Canadian warning labels on adult smoking behaviour. Tob Control 2003;12:391-5.