Evaluating smokers' reactions to advertising for new lower nicotine quest cigarettes

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 80-84

  Shadel, William G ^a,c,d   Lerman, Caryn ^b   Cappella, Joseph ^b   Strasser, Andrew A ^b   Pinto, Angela ^b   Hornik, Robert ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d RAND CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Advertising; Cigarettes; Message processing; Smoking

Indexed keywords

NICOTINE;

ADULT; ADVERTIZING; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH BELIEF; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; SMOKING; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

ADULT; ADVERTISING; ATTITUDE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COGNITION; CULTURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SMOKING; TOBACCO USE DISORDER;

EID: 33645372542     PISSN: 0893164X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0893-164X.20.1.80     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
2. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R., Feinstein, J., & Jarvis, B. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197-253.
3. Cohen, J. B. (1996). Smokers' knowledge and understanding of advertised tar numbers: Health policy implications. American Journal of Public Health, 86, 18-24.
4. Halpern, M. T. (1994). Effect of smoking characteristics on cognitive dissonance in current and former smokers. Addictive Behaviors, 19, 209-217.
5. Hamilton, W. L., DiStefano Norton, G., Ouellette, T. K., Rhodes, W. M., Kling, R., & Connolly, G. N. (2004). Smokers' responses to advertisements for regular and light cigarettes and potential reduced-exposure tobacco products. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 6(Suppl. 3), S353-S362.
6. Heatherton, T. F., Kozlowski, L. T., Frecker, R. C., & Fagerstroem, K. O. (1991). The Fagerstroem Test for Nicotine Dependence: A revision of the Fagerstroem Tolerance Questionnaire. British Journal of Addiction, 86, 1119-1127.
7. Kozlowski, L. T., Goldberg, M. E., Sweeney, C. T., Palmer, R. F., Pillitteri, J. L., Yost, B. A., et al. (1999). Smoker reactions to a "radio message" that light cigarettes are as dangerous as regular cigarettes. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 1, 67-76.
8. Kozlowski, L. T., Goldberg, M. F., & Yost, B. A. (2000). Measuring smokers' perceptions of the health risks from smoking light cigarettes. American Journal of Public Health, 90, 1318-1319.
9. Kozlowski, L. T., Palmer, R., Stine, M. M., Strasser, A. A., & Yost, B. A. (2001). Persistent effects of a message counter-marketing light cigarettes. Results of a randomized controlled trial. Addictive Behaviors, 26, 447-452.
10. Lohse, G. L. (1997). Consumer eye movement patterns on yellow pages advertising. Journal of Advertising, 26, 61-73.
11. Manfredo, M. J., & Bright, A. D. (1991). A model for assessing the effects of communication on recreationists. Journal of Leisure Research, 23, 1-20.
12. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaikin & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 41-72). New York: Guilford Press.
13. Shadel, W. G., Niaura, R., & Abrams, D. B. (2001). How do adolescents process smoking and anti-smoking advertising? A social-cognitive analysis with implications for smoking initiation. Review of General Psychology, 5, 429-444.
14. Shiffman, S., Pillitteri, J. L., Burton, S. L., & Marino, M. E. (2004). Smoker and ex-smoker reactions to cigarettes claiming reduced risk. Tobacco Control, 13, 78-85.
15. Shiffman, S., Pillitteri, J. L., Burton, S. L., Rohay, J. M., & Gitchell, J. G. (2001). Smokers' beliefs about "light" and "ultra light" cigarettes. Tobacco Control, 10(Suppl. 1), i17-i23.
16. Steward, W., Schneider, T., Pizarro, J., & Salovey, P. (2003). Need for cognition moderates responses to framed smoking-cessation messages. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 2439-2464.
17. Thun, M. J., & Burns, D. M. (2001). Health impact of "reduced yield" cigarettes: A critical assessment of the epidemiological evidence. Tobacco Control, 10(Suppl. 1), i4-i11.
18. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2000). Reducing tobacco use: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Author.