Normative values for the Foot Posture Index

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2008, Pages

  Redmond, Anthony C ^a   Crane, Yvonne Z ^a   Menz, Hylton B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 60549087652     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17571146     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-1-6     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Nigg BM, Cole GK, Nachbauer W. Effects of arch height of the foot on angular motion of the lower extremities in running. J Biomech 1993, 26:909-916. 10.1016/0021-9290(93)90053-H, 8349716.
2. Nawoczenski DA, Saltzman CL, Cook TM. The effect of foot structure on the three-dimensional kinematic coupling behavior of the leg and rearfoot. Phys Ther 1998, 78:404-416.
3. Dahle LK, Mueller M, Delitto A, Diamond JE. Visual assessment of foot type and relationship of foot type to lower extremity injury. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1991, 14:70-74.
4. Cowan DN, Jones BH, Robinson JR. Foot morphologic characteristics and risk of exercise-related injury. Arch Fam Med 1993, 2:773-777. 10.1001/archfami.2.7.773, 7906597.
5. Razeghi M, Batt ME. Foot type classification: a critical review of current methods. Gait Posture 2002, 15:282-291. 10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00151-5, 11983503.
6. Cowan DN, Robinson JR, Jones BH. Consistency of visual assessment of arch height among clinicians. Foot Ankle Int 1994, 15:213-217.
7. Cavanagh PR, Rodgers MM. The arch index: a useful measure from footprints. J Biomech 1987, 20:547-551. 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90255-7, 3611129.
8. Staheli LT, Chew DE, Corbett M. The longitudinal arch. A survey of eight hundred and eighty-two feet in normal children and adults. J Bone Joint Surg 1987, 69A:426-428.
9. Sell K, Verity TM, Worrell TW, Pease BJ, Wigglesworth J. Two measurement techniques for assessing subtalar joint position: a reliability study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1994, 19:162-167.
10. Sobel E, Levitz S, Caselli M, Brentnall Z, Tran M. Natural history of the rearfoot angle: preliminary values in 150 children. Foot Ankle Int 1999, 20:119-125.
11. Mueller MJ, Host JV, Norton BJ. Navicular drop as a composite measure of excessive pronation. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1993, 83:198-202.
12. Redmond AC, Crosbie J, Ouvrier RA. Development and validation of a novel rating system for scoring standing foot posture: The Foot Posture Index. Clin Biomech 2006, 21:89-98. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.08.002, 16182419.
13. Keenan AM, Redmond AC, Horton M, Conaghan PG, Tennant A. The Foot Posture Index: Rasch analysis of a novel, foot-specific outcome measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007, 88:88-93. 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.005, 17207681.
14. Redmond AC, Burns J, Crosbie J, Ouvrier R. An initial appraisal of the validity of a criterion based, observational clinical rating system for foot posture. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2001, 31:160.
15. Scharfbillig R, Evans AM, Copper AW, Williams M, Scutter S, Iasiello H, Redmond A. Criterion validation of four criteria of the Foot Posture Index. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2004, 94(1):31-38.
16. Nube VL, Molyneaux L, Yue DK. Biomechanical risk factors associated with neuropathic ulceration of the hallux in people with diabetes mellitus. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2006, 93:185-189.
17. Noakes H, Payne C. The reliability of the manual supination resistance test. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2003, 93:185-189.
18. Rome K, Brown CL. Randomized clinical trial into the impact of rigid foot orthoses on balance parameters in excessively pronated feet. Clin Rehabil 2004, 18:624-630. 10.1191/0269215504cr767oa, 15473114.
19. Yates B, White S. The incidence and risk factors in the development of medial tibial stress syndrome among naval recruits. Am J Sports Med 2004, 32:772-780. 10.1177/0095399703258776, 15090396.
20. Burns J, Keenan AM, Redmond A. Foot type and overuse injury in triathletes. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2005, 95:235-241.
21. Cain LE, Nicholson LL, Adams RD, Burns J. Foot morphology and foot/ankle injury in indoor football. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport 2006, (in press).
22. Menz HB, Morris ME, Lord SR. Foot and ankle risk factors for falls in older people: a prospective study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2006, 61(8):866-870. 16912106.
23. Scott G, Menz HB, Newcombe L. Age-related differences in foot structure and function. Gait Posture 2007, 26:68-75. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.009, 16945538.
24. Moseley AM, Crosbie J, Adams R. Normative data for passive ankle plantarflexion-dorsiflexion flexibility. Clin Biomech 2001, 16:514-521. 10.1016/S0268-0033(01)00030-4, 11427294.
25. Menz HB, Munteanu SE. Validity of 3 clinical techniques for the measurement of static foot posture in older people. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2005, 35:479-486.
26. Wunderlich RE, Cavanagh PR. Gender differences in adult foot shape: implications for shoe design. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001, 33:605-611.
27. Riddiford-Harland DL, Steele JR, Storlien LH. Does obesity influence foot structure in prepubescent children?. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2000, 24:541-544. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801192, 10849573.
28. Wearing SC, Hills AP, Byrne NM, Hennig EM, McDonald M. The Arch Index: a measure of flat or fat feet?. Foot Ankle Int 2004, 25:575-581.
29. Burns J, Crosbie J. Weightbearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion in idiopathic pes cavus compared to normal and pes planus feet. Foot 2005, 15:91-94.