The effect of foot structure on the three-dimensional kinematic coupling behavior of the leg and rear foot

Physical Therapy

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 1998, Pages 404-416

  Nawoczenski, Deborah A ^a   Saltzman, Charles L ^a   Cook, Thomas M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Foot alignment; Foot structure; Kinematic coupling; Radiographic classification; Rear foot kinematics; Three dimensional analysis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CALCANEUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINESIOLOGY; LEG; MALE; ROTATION; RUNNING; TALUS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TREADMILL EXERCISE;

EID: 0031895610     PISSN: 00319023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ptj/78.4.404     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Cowan DN, Jones BH, Robinson JR. Foot morphologic characteristics and risk of exercise-related injury. Arch Fam Med. 1993;2:773-777.
2. James SL, Bates BT, Osternig LR. Injuries to runners. Am J Sports Med. 1978;6:40-50.
3. Nigg BM, Cole GK, Nachbauer W. Effects of arch height of the foot on angular motion of the lower extremities in running. J Biomech. 1993;26:909-916.
4. Olerud C, Rosendahl Y. Torsion-transmitting properties of the hind foot. Clin Orthop. 1987;214:285-294.
5. Radin EL, King HY, Riegger C, et al. Relationship between lower limb dynamics and knee joint pain. J Orthop Res. 1991;9:398-405.
6. Root ML, Orien WP, Weed JH. Normal and Abnormal Function of the Foot: Clinical Biomechanics. Los Angeles, Calif: Clinical Biomechanics Corp; 1977:29-33.
7. Simkin A, Leicher I, Giladi M, et al. Combined effect of foot arch structure and an orthotic device on stress fractures. Foot Ankle. 1989; 10:25-29.
8. Simkin A, Leichter I. Role of the calcaneal inclination in the energy storage capacity of the human foot: a biomechanical model. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1990;28:149-152.
9. Moseley L, Smith R, Hunt A, Gant R. Three-dimensional kinematics of the rearfoot during the stance phase of walking in normal adult males. Clin Biomech. 1996;11:39-45.
10. Lundberg A, Svensson O, Bylund C, et al. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex, part 2: pronation and supination. Foot Ankle. 1989;9:248-253.
11. Lundberg A, Svensson I, Bylund C, Selvick G. Kinematics of the ankle/foot complex, part 3: influence of leg rotation. Foot Ankle. 1989;9:304-309.
12. Benink RJ. The constraint mechanism of the human tarsus. Acta Orthop Scand. 1985;56(S215):49-68.
13. Inman VT. The Joints of the Ankle. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1976:35-43.
14. Van Langelaan E. Relative talotibial movements and relative tarsal movements. Acta Orthop Scand. 1983;204:135-265.
15. Novick A, Kelley D. Position and movement changes of the foot with orthotic intervention during the loading response of gait. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1990;11:301-312.
16. Root ML, Weed JP, Sgarlato T, Bluth DR. Axis of motion of the subtalar joint. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1966;56:149-155.
17. Scott S, Winter D. Talocrural and talocalcaneal joint kinematics and kinetics during the stance phase of walking. J Biomech. 1991;24: 743-752.
18. Wright DG, Desai SM, Henderson WH. Action of the subtalar and ankle-joint complex during the stance phase of walking. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964;46:361-382.
19. Kirby KA. Methods for determination of positional variations in the subtalar joint axis. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1987;77:228-234.
20. Engsberg JR, Andrews JG. Kinematic analysis of the talocalcaneal/ talocrural joint during running support. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987;19: 275-284.
21. Ball P, Johnson GR. Technique for the measurement of hindfoot inversion and eversion and its use to study a normal population. Clin Biomech. 1996;11:165-169.
22. Engsberg JR, Grimston SK, Wackwitz JH. Predicting talocalcaneal joint orientations from talocalcaneal/talocrural joint orientations. J Orthop Res. 1988;6:749-757.
23. Hawes M, Nachbauer W, Sovak D, Nigg B. Footprint parameters as a measure of arch height. Foot Ankle. 1992;13:22-26.
24. Nigg BM, Nachbauer W, Cole GK. Effects of arch height of the foot on angular motion of the lower extremities in running. In: Proceedings of NACOB II, the Second North American Congress on Biomechanics, Chicago, IL. Chicago, III: American and Canadian Society of Biomechanics; 1992:233-234.
25. Saltzman CL, Nawoczenski DA, Talbot KD. Measurement of the medial longitudinal arch. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76:45-49.
26. Giladi M, Milgrom C, Stein M, et al. The low arch, a protective factor in stress fractures: a prospective study of 295 military recruits. Orthop Rev. 1985;14:709-712.
27. Hamill J, Bates B, Knutzen K, Kirkpatrick G. Relationship between selected static and dynamic lower extremity measures. Clin Biomech. 1989;4:217-225.
28. Kernozek T, Richard M. Foot placement angle and arch type: effect on rearfoot motion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1990;71:988-991.
29. Cowan DN, Robinson JR, Jones BH, et al. Consistency of visual assessments of arch height among clinicians. Foot Ankle. 1994;15: 213-217.
30. Elveru RA, Rothstein JM, Lamb RL. Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting: subtalar and ankle joint measurements. Phys Ther. 1988;68:672-677.
31. Lattanza L, Gray G, Kantner R. Closed versus open kinematic chain measurements of subtalar joint eversion: implications for clinical practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1988;9:310-314.
32. Picciano AM, Rowlands MS, Worrell T. Reliability of open and closed kinetic chain subtalar joint neutral positions and navicular drop test. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993,18:553-558.
33. Smith-Oricchio K, Harris B. Interrater reliability of subtalar neutral, calcaneal inversion and eversion. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1990;12: 10-15.
34. Brand PW, Coleman WC. A standard for dorsal-plantar and lateral radiographic projections of the feet. Orthopedics. 1987;10:117-120
35. Cobey JC, Sella E. Standardizing methods of measurement of foot shape by including the effects of subtalar rotation. Foot Ankle. 1981;2: 30-36.
36. DiGiovanni JE, Smith SD. Normal biomechanics of the adult rearfoot: a radiographic analysis. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1976;66:812-824.
37. Gould N. Graphing the adult foot and ankle, foot Ankle. 1982;2: 213-219.
38. Kitaoka HB, Lnndberg A, Luo ZP, An KN. Kinematics of the normal arch of the foot and ankle under physiologic loading. Foot Ankle. 1995;16:492-499.
39. Saltzman CL, Brandser EA, Berbaum KS, et al. Reliability of standard foot radiographic measurements. Foot Ankle. 1994;15:661-665.
40. Shereff M, DiGiovanni L, Bejjani F, et al. A comparison of non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing radiographs of the foot. Foot Ankle. 1990;10:306-311.
41. Steel MI, Johnson K, Dewith M, Ilstrup D. Radiographic measurements of the normal adult foot. Foot Ankle. 1980;1:151-158.
42. Gamble F,Yale I. Clinical Foot Roentgenology. New York, NY: Robert E Krieger; 1975.
43. Hunt G. Subtalar Joint Pronation: The Influence of Balanced Insoles. College Park, Md: University of Maryland; 1980. Master's thesis.
44. Weissman SD. Radiology of the Foot. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1989.
45. Shrout P, Fleiss J. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420-428.
46. Abdel-Aziz Y, Karara H. Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into object space coordinates in close-range photogrammetry. In: American Society of Photogrammetry Symposium on Close-Range Photogrammetry. Falls Church, Va: American Society of Photogrammetry; 1971.
47. Norton BJ, Ellison JB. Reliability and concurrent validity of the Metrecom for length measurements on inanimate objects. Phys Ther. 1993;73:266-274.
48. Smidt GL, McQuade KJ, Wei SH. Evaluation of the Metrecom and its use in quantifying skeletal landmark locations. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1992;16:182-188.
49. Siegel KL, Kepple TM, O'Connell PG, et al. A technique to evaluate foot function during the stance phase of gait. Foot Ankle. 1995;16: 764-770.
50. Nawoczenski DA, Wei SH, McQuade KJ, Smidt GL. Use of a six degree-of-freedom digitizer to augment three-dimensional kinematic video analysis techniques. Phys Ther. 1993;73:S101. Abstract.
51. Craig J. Robotics: Mechanics and Control. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co; 1989:48-51.
52. Wei SH, McQuade KJ, Smidt GL. Three-dimensional joint range of motion measurements from skeletal coordinate data. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1993;18:687-691.
53. Yu B, Hay JG. Angular momentum and performance in the triple jump: a cross-sectional analysis. J Appl Biomech. 1995;11:81-102.
54. Areblad M, Nigg BM, Ekstrand J, et al. Three-dimensional measurement of rearfoot motion during running. J Biomech. 1990;23:933-940.
55. Siegler S, Chen J, Schneck C. The three-dimensional kinematics and flexibility characteristics of the human ankle and subtalar joints, part I: kinematics. J Biomed Eng. 1988;110:364-373.
56. Soutas-Little R, Beavis G, Verstraete M, Markus T. Analysis of foot motion during running using a joint coordinate system. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1987;19:285-293.
57. Mann R, Baxter D, Lutter L. Running Symposium. Foot Ankle. 1981;1:190-224.
58. Ouzounian TJ, Shereff MJ. In vivo determination of midfoot motion. Foot Ankle. 1989;10:140-146.
59. Reinschmidt C, Stacoff A, Stussi E. Heel movement within a court shoe. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;24:1390-1395.
60. Stacoff A, Kalin X, Stussi E. The effects of shoes on the torsion and rearfoot motion in running. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991;23:482-490.
61. Stacoff A, Reinschmidt C, Stussi E. The movement of the heel within a running shoe. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992;24:695-701.
62. Hinterman B, Nigg BM, Cole GK. Influence of selective arthrodesis on the movement transfer between calcaneus and tibia in vitro. Clin Biomech. 1994;9:356-361.
63. Manter J. Movements of subtalar and transverse tarsal joints. Anat Rec. 1941;80:397-410.
64. Hicks J. The mechanics of the foot, I: the joints. J Anat. 1953;87: 345-357.
65. Close J, Inman V, Poor P, Todd B. The function of the subtalar joint. Clin Orthop. 1967;50:159-177.
66. Subotnick SI. The cavus foot. The Physician and Sportsmedicine. 1980;8(7):53-55.
67. Subotnick SI. The flat foot. The Physician and Sportsmedicine. 1981;9(8):85-91.