Criterion validation of four criteria of the foot posture index

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association

Volumn 94, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 31-38

  Scharfbillig, Rolf ^a   Evans, Angela M ^a   Copper, Alexander W ^a   Williams, Marie ^a   Scutter, Sheila ^a   Iasiello, Hala ^a   Redmond, Anthony ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOOT; FOOT RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; TALUS; VALIDATION PROCESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; PHYSIOLOGY; PILOT STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZATION; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; FEMALE; FOOT; FOOT BONES; HUMANS; MALE; PILOT PROJECTS; PRONATION; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SUPINATION;

EID: 1542506088     PISSN: 87507315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7547/87507315-94-1-31     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. MENZ HB: Clinical hindfoot measurement: a review of the literature. The Foot 5: 57, 1995.
2. MCPOIL T, CORNWALL MW: Relationship between neutral subtalar joint position and pattern of rearfoot motion during walking. Foot Ankle Int 15: 141, 1994.
3. REDMOND A, BURNS J, OUVRIER R, ET AL: The Foot Posture Index. Paper presented at the Australian Podiatry Council National Conference, Canberra, May 16, 2001.
4. EVANS AM, COPPER AW, SCHARFBILLIG RW, ET AL: Reliability of the Foot Posture Index and traditional measures of foot position. JAPMA 93: 203, 2003.
5. PORTNEY LG, WATKINS MP: "Validity of Measurements," in Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice, 2nd Ed, p 82, Prentice Hall Health, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2000.
6. REDMOND A, BURNS J, OUVRIER R, ET AL: An initial appraisal of the validity of a criterion based, observational clinical rating system for foot posture [abstract]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 31: 160, 2001.
7. SCHON LC, WEINFELD SB, HORTON GA, ET AL: Radiographic and clinical classification of acquired midtarsus deformities. Foot Ankle Int 19: 394, 1998.
8. WEISSMAN SD: "Biomechanically Acquired Foot Types," in Radiology of the Foot, 2nd Ed, ed by SD Weissman, p 67, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1989.
9. MONTAGNE J, CHEVROT A, GALMICHE JM: "The Foot in Standing: Radiographic Techniques - Markings and Measurements," in Atlas of Foot Radiology, ed by N Chafetz, p 50, Masson, New York, 1981.
10. PAGANO RR: "Correlation," in Understanding Statistics in the Behavioral Sciences, ed by RR Pagano, p 118, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, 2000.
11. BACKER M, KOFOED H: Passive ankle mobility: clinical measurement compared with radiography. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71: 696, 1989.
12. WESELEY MS, KOVAL R, KLEIGER B: Roentgen measurement of ankle flexion-extension motion. Clin Orthop 65: 167, 1969.
13. HERBSTHOFER B, ECKARDT A, ROMPE JD, ET AL: Significance of radiographic angle measurements in evaluation of congenital clubfoot. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117: 324, 1998.