Nonlinear ΔR2* effects in perfusion quantification using bolus-tracking MRI

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 486-492

  Calamante, Fernando ^a,b   Connelly, Alan ^a,b   Van Osch, Matthias J P ^c  

^a FLOREY INSTITUTE OF NEUROSCIENCE AND MENTAL HEALTH   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^c LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bolus tracking mri; Cerebral blood flow; Contrast agent concentration; Perfusion; Quantification

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY;

CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW; CONTRAST AGENT; DYNAMIC SUSCEPTIBILITY CONTRAST MRIS; LINEAR RELATIONSHIPS; PERFUSION; PERFUSION QUANTIFICATION; QUADRATIC MODELING; QUANTIFICATION;

ERRORS;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTERIAL BLOOD; ARTICLE; BRAIN DISEASE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; NEUROIMAGING; PERFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; ALGORITHM; ARTIFACT; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BRAIN; BRAIN CIRCULATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; EVALUATION; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; METHODOLOGY; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VASCULARIZATION;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; BRAIN; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 60549083325     PISSN: 07403194     EISSN: 15222594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21839     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Calamante F, Thomas DL, Pell GS, Wiersma J, Turner R. Measuring cerebral blood flow using magnetic resonance imaging techniques. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1999;19:701-735.
2. Kidwell CS, Alger JR, Saver JL. Evolving paradigms in neuroimaging of the ischemic penumbra. Stroke 2004;35(Suppl I):2662-2665.
3. Hjort N, Butcher K, Davis SM, Kidwell CS, Koroshetz WJ, Röther J, Schellinger PD, Warach S, Østergaard L. Magnetic resonance imaging criteria for thrombolysis in acute cerebral infarct. Stroke 2005;36:388-397.
4. Akbudak E, Hsu RM, Li Y, Conturo TE. ΔR* and Δφ contrast agent perfusion effects in blood: quantitation and linearity assessment. In: Proceedings of the 6th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Sydney, Australia, 1998. (abstract 1197).
5. van Osch MJ, Vonken EJ, Viergever MA, Van der Grond J, Bakker CJ. Measuring the arterial input function with gradient echo sequences. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:1067-1076.
6. Ostergaard L, WeisskoffRM, CheslerDA, Gyldensted C, RosenBR. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I. Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:715-725.
7. Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:466-473.
8. van Osch MJ, Vonken EJ, Wu O, Viergever MA, Van der Grond J, Bakker CJ. Model of the human vasculature for studying the influence of contrast injection speed on cerebral perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:614-622.
9. Simonsen CZ, Ostergaard L, Smith DF, Vestergaard-Poulsen P, Gyldensted C. Comparison of gradient- and spin-echo imaging: CBF, CBV, and MTT measurements by bolus tracking. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:411-416.
10. Calamante F, Vonken EPA, van Osch MJP. Contrast agent concentration measurements affecting quantification of bolus-tracking perfusion MRI. Magn Reson Med 2007;58:544-553.
11. Pedersen M, Klarhofer M, Christensen S, Ouallet JC, Ostergaard L, Dousset V, Moonen C. Quantitative cerebral perfusion using the PRESTO acquisition scheme. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:930-940.
12. Kjølby BF, Ostergaard L, Kiselev VG. Theoretical model of intravascular paramagnetic tracers effect on tissue relaxation. Magn Reson Med 2006;56:187-197.
13. Vonken EPA, Beekman FJ, Bakker CJG, Viergever MA. Maximum likelihood estimation of cerebral blood flow in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:343-350.
14. Jochimsen TH, Newbould RD, Skare ST, Clayton DB, Albers GW, Moseley ME, Bammer R. Identifying systematic errors in quantitative dynamic-susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging by high-resolution multi-echo parallel EPI. NMR Biomed 2007;20:429-438.
15. Johnson KM, Tao JZT, Kennan RP, Gore JC. Intravascular susceptibility agent effects on tissue transverse relaxation rates in vivo. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:909-914.
16. *) and contrastagent (MION) dose. JMagn Reson Imaging 2003;18:397-403.
17. Wu O, Østergaard L, WeisskoffRM, BennerT, Rosen BR, Sorensen AG. Tracer arrival timing-insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion-weighted imaging usingsingularvalue decomposition witha block-circulant deconvolution matrix. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:164-174.
18. Smith MR, Lu H, Trochet S, Frayne R. Removing the effect of SVD algorithmic artifacts present in quantitative MR perfusion studies. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:631-634.
19. Calamante F, Willats L, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Bolus delay and dispersion in perfusion MRI: implications for tissue predictor models in stroke. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:1180-1185.
20. Vonken EPA, van Osch MJP, Baker CJG, Viergever MA. Simultaneous qualitative cerebral perfusion and Gd-DTPA extravasation measurements with dual-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:820-827.
21. Wintermark M, Sesay M, Barbier E, Borbély K, Dillon WP, Eastwood JD, Glenn TC, Grandin CB, Pedraza S, Soustiel J-F, Nariai T, Zaharchuk G, Caille J-M, Dousset V, Yonas H. Comparative overview of brain perfusion imaging techniques. Stroke 2005;36:e83-e99.
22. Wintermark M, Meuli R, Browaeys P, Reichhart M, Bogousslavsky J, Schnyder P, Michel P. Comparison of CT perfusion and angiography and MRI in selecting stroke patients for acute treatment. Neurology 2007;68:694-697.
23. Wu O, Koroshetz WJ, Østergaard L, Buonanno FS, Copen WA, Gonzalez RG, RordorfG, RosenBR, Schwamm LH, WeisskoffRM, SorensenAG. Predicting tissue outcome in acute human cerebral ischemia using combined diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MR imaging. Stroke 2001;32:933-942.
24. Waaijer A, van Leeuwen MS, van Osch MJP, van der Worp BH, Moll FL, Lo RTH, Mali WPTM, Prokop M. Changes in cerebral perfusion after revascularization of symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: CT measurement. Radiology 2007;245:541-548.