Learning from the application of the ESDP: Influences on european territorial governance

DISP

Volumn 172, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 21-34

  Stead, Dominic ^a,b   Waterhout, Bas ^a,b  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EUROPEAN COMMISSION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; LEARNING; POLICY MAKING; SPATIAL PLANNING; TERRITORIAL PLANNING; TERRITORIALITY;

EID: 44449104257     PISSN: 02513625     EISSN: 02513625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2008.10557000     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. BÖHME, K. (2002): Nordic Echoes of European Spatial Planning. Stockholm: Nordregio.
2. BÖHME, K.; SCHÖN, P. (2006): From Leipzig to Leipzig: Territorial Research Delivers Evidence for the New Territorial Agenda of the European Union. disP 165(2): 61-70.
3. BUUNK, W. W. (2003): The Locus of European Integration. Delft: Eburon.
4. CEMAT (2000): Guiding Principles for Sustainable Spatial Development of the European Continent, Adopted at the 12th Session of the CEMAT held in Hanover 2000.
5. CEMAT (2006a): Resolution No. 1 on Polycentric Development: Promoting competitiveness, enhancing cohesion, Adopted at the 14th Session of the European Conference of Ministers responsible for Spatial/Regional Planning (CEMAT) of the Member States of the Council of Europe, in Lisbon (Portugal), 27 October 2006. (http://www. coe.int/t/e/cultural_co-operation/environment/ cemat/list_of_conferences/14CEMAT_Resolution1_en.pdf)
6. CEMAT (2006b): Resolution No. 2 on Territorial governance: empowerment through enhanced coordination. Adopted at the 14th Session of the European Conference of Ministers responsible for Spatial/Regional Planning (CEMAT) of the Member States of the Council of Europe, in Lisbon (Portugal), 27 October 2006. (http://www. coe.int/t/e/cultural_co-operation/environment/ cemat/ list_of_conferences/14CEMAT_Resolution2_en.pdf)
7. CHRISTIANSEN, T. (2006): The European Commission: the European executive between continuity and change. In: RICHARDSON, J. (ed.) European Union - Power and Policy - Making, 3rd Edition. Oxon/New York: Routledge, pp. 97-120.
8. COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES - CEC (2000): Communication from the Commission to the Member States of 28.4.00 laying down guidelines for a Community Initiative concerning trans-European cooperation intended to encourage harmonious and balanced development of the European territory INTERREG III. COM(2000)1101. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
9. COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES - CEC (2001): European governance: A white paper. (Communication from the Commission) COM (2001) 4-8. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
10. COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES - CEC (2002a): Communication from the Commission on Impact. Assessment. COM (3003) 276 final. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
11. COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES - CEC (2002b): Structural policies and European territory: Cooperation without frontiers. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
12. COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES - CEC (2005a): General Budget of the European Union for the financial year 2005. SEC (2005) 50. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
13. COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES - CEC (2005b): Impact Assessment Guidelines. SEC (2005) 791. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
14. COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES - CEC (2005c): Cohesion Policy in Support of Growth and Jobs: Community Strategic Guidelines 2007-2013. COM (2005) 0299 final. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
15. COMMITTEE ON SPATIAL DEVELOPMENT - CSD (1999): European Spatial Development Perspective. Towards Balanced, and Sustainable Development of the Territory of the EU. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
16. COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION (2006): Community Strategic Guidelines on Cohesion, 2006/0131 of 18 August 2006; approved by the European Parliament on 27 September 2006. (http://register. consilium.europa.eu/pdf/en/06/st11/st11807.eno6.pdf)
17. DÉJEANT-PONS, M. (2003): The European Conference of Ministers responsible for Regional Planning (CEMAT). Informationen zur Raumentwicklung 7: 401-410.
18. DÜHR, S.; STEAD, D.; ZONNEVELD, W (2007): The Europeanization of Spatial Planning through Territorial Cooperation. Planning Practice and Research 22(3): 291-307.
19. NORDREGIO et al. (3007): Application and effects of the ESDP in Member states. Final Report of ESPON project 2.3.1. (http://www.espon.eu)
20. FALUDI, A. (2000): The performance of spatial planning. Planning Practice & Research 15(4): 299-318.
21. FALUDI, A. (2001): The Application of the European Spatial Development Perspective: Evidence from the North-West Metropolitan Area. European Planning Studies 9(5): 663-675.
22. FALUDI, A. (2006): The European Spatial Development Perspective Shaping the Agenda. European Journal of Spatial Development 20 (November 2006): 1-22.
23. FALUDI, A. (2007): Making Sense of the Territorial Agenda of the European Union. European Journal of Spatial Development 25 (November 2007): 1-21.
24. FALUDI, A. (2008): European Territorial Cooperation and Learning. Introduction to the Special Issue. disP (this issue).
25. FALUDI, A.; WATERHOUT, B. (2003): The Making of the European Spatial Development. Perspective - No Masterplan/ London: Routledge.
26. FALUDI, A; WATERHOUT, B. (2006): Introducing Evidence-Based Planning. disP 165(2): 4-13.
27. HACHMANN, V (2008): Promoting Learning in Transnational Networks. disP (this issue).
28. JANIN RIVOLIN, U.; FALUDI, A. (2005): The Hidden Face of European Spatial Planning: Innovations in Governance. European Planning Studies 13(2): 195-215.
29. KORTHALS ALTES, W. (2006): The Single European Market and Land Development. Planning Theory & Practice 7(3): 247-266.
30. MASTOP, H. (1997): Performance in Dutch spatial planning: an introduction. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 26(4): 807-813.
31. MASTOP, H.; FALUDI, A. (1997): Evaluation of strategic plans: The performance principle. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 24(6): 815-832.
32. RAVESTEYN, N.; EVERS, D. (3004): Unseen Europe. A survey of EU politics and its impact on spatial development in The Netherlands. The Hague: RPB (Netherlands Institute for Spatial Research).
33. ROBERT, J.; STUMM, T.; DE VET, J. M.; REINCKE, G. J.; HOLLANDERS, M.; FIGUEIREDO, M. A. (3001): Spatial impact of community policies and the costs of non-coordination. Brussels: DG Regional Policy, European Commission.
34. SHAW, D.; SYKES, O. (2003): Investigating the application of the European Spatial Development Perspective (ESDP) to regional planning in the United Kingdom. Town Planning Review 74(1): 31-50.
35. SYKES, O. (3007): Examining the relationship between transnational and national planning: French and British spatial planning and the European Spatial Development Perspective. In: BOOTH, P.; BREUILLARD, M.; FRASER, C.; PARIS, D. (eds.) (2007): Spatial Planning Systems of Britain and France: A comparative analysis. London: Routledge, pp. 99-118.
36. WATERHOUT, B.; STEAD, D. (2007): Mixed messages: How the ESDP's concepts have been applied in INTERREG IIIB programs, priorities and projects. Planning Practice and Research 22(3): 395-415.
37. ZONNEVELD, W; STEAD, D.; DUBOIS, A; GLØERSEN, E. (3006): Polycentric Urban Development and Rural-Urban Partnership. Thematic Study of INTERREG and ESPON activities. Esch-sur-Alzette/Viborg: ESPON Coordination Unit/ INTERACT Point. Qualification and Transfer. (http://www.espon.eu)
38. ZONNEVELD, W; STEAD, D. (2007): Mutual learning between European research and territorial cooperation: The issue of urban-rural relationships. Planning Practice and Research 22(3): 439-453.