Psychological and social risks of behavioral research

IRB Ethics and Human Research

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 11-15

  Labott, Susan M ^a,b   Johnson, Timothy P ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; ARTICLE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENTIALITY; ETHICS; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMAN; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MENTAL STRESS; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RESEARCH SUBJECT; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ADVISORY COMMITTEES; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONFIDENTIALITY; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HUMANS; RESEARCH SUBJECTS; RISK; RISK ASSESSMENT; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 6044249957     PISSN: 01937758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/3563751     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1979.
2. 45 CFR 46. Protection of Human Subjects.
3. 45 CFR 46.102.
4. Barnbaum D. Making more sense of "minimal risk." IRB: Ethics & Human Research 2002;24:10-13.
5. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Research Involving Persons with Mental Disorders That May Affect Decisionmaking Capacity. Rockville, MD, 1998.
6. National Research Council. Protecting Participants and Facilitating Social and Behavioral Sciences Research. National Academies Press: Washington, D.C., 2003.
7. Prentice ED, Gordon BG. Institutional review board assessment of risks and benefits associated with research. In: National Bioethics Advisory Commission. Ethical and Policy Issues in Research Involving Human Participants, Vol. II, Bethesda, MD, 2001.
8. Hermeren G. Human and social consequences of research. Research Ethics 1983;360-369;
9. Sieber JE. Planning research: Basic ethical decision-making. In: Sales BD, Folkman S, eds. Ethics in Research with Human Participants. American Psychological Association: Washington, D.C., 2000:13-26.
10. See ref. 8, Sieber 2000.
11. Singer E, Hippler H, Schwarz N. Confidentiality assurances in surveys: Reassurance or threat? International Journal of Public Opinion Research 1992;4:256-268.
12. Singer E, Von Thurn DR, Miller ER. Confidentiality assurances and response. Public Opinion Quarterly 1995;59:66-77.
13. Singer E, Mathiowetz NA, Couper MP. The impact of privacy and confidentiality concerns on survey participation. Public Opinion Quarterly 1993;57:465-482.
14. See ref. 10, Singer 1992.
15. Newman E, Kaloupek DG, Keane TM, Folstein SF. Ethical issues in trauma research. In: Kantor GK, Jasinski JL, eds. Out of the Darkness. London: Sage, 1997, p. 271-281.
16. Newman E, Walker EA, Gefland A. Assessing the ethical costs and benefits of trauma-focused research. General Hospital Psychiatry 1999;21:187-196.
17. Sheon AR, Wagner L, McElrath MJ, Keefer MC, Zimmerman E, Israel H, Berger D, Fast P. Preventing discrimination against volunteers in prophylactic HIV vaccine trials. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes and Human Retrovirology 1998;19:519-526.
18. Oakes JM. Survey research. In: Amdur RJ, Bankert EA, eds. Institutional Review Board: Management and function. Jones and Bartlert: Sudbury, MA, 2002, p. 428-433.
19. Sieber JE. The ethics and politics of sensitive research. In: Renzetti CM, Lee RM, eds. Researching Sensitive Topics. London: Sage, 1993, p.14-26.
20. Singer E, Levine FJ. Protection of human subjects of research: Recent developments and future prospects for the social sciences. Public Opinion Quarterly 2003;67:148-164.
21. Ilgen DR, Bell BS. Conducting industrial and organizational psychological research: Institutional review of research in work organizations. Ethics & Behavior 2001;11:395-412.
22. Schreier BA, Stadler HA. Perspectives of research participants, psychologist investigators, and institutional review boards. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1992;74:1067-1072.
23. Kimmel AJ. Predictable biases in the ethical decision making of American psychologists. American Psychologist 1991;46:786-788.
24. Oakes JM. Risks and wrongs in social science research: An evaluator's guide to the IRB. Evaluation Review 2002;26:443-479, p. 467.
25. See ref. 6, National Research Council 2003.
26. Fendrich M, Johnson T, Wislar JS, Sudman S. The feasibility of hair testing in a household survey on drug abuse. In: Mieczkowski T, ed. Drug Testing Technology: Assessment of Field Applications. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1999, p. 235-253.