Conducting industrial and organizational psychological research: institutional review of research in work organizations

Ethics and Behavior

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 395-412

  Ilgen, Daniel R ^a   Bell, Bradford S ^a  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Employee participation; Human participants; Informed consent; Institutional review board; Risk

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; JOB FINDING; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; PSYCHOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNIVERSITY;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP; DATA COLLECTION; DISCLOSURE; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICAL REVIEW; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; FACULTY; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; JOB APPLICATION; PSYCHOLOGY, INDUSTRIAL; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 0035753644     PISSN: 10508422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/S15327019EB1104_03     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. American Psychological Association Committee for the Protection of Human Participants in Research. (1992). Ethical principles. American Psychologist, 47, 1597-1611.
2. Ceci, S. J., Peters, D., & Plotkin, J. (1985). Human subjects review, personal values, and the regulation of social science research. American Psychologist, 40, 994-1002.
3. Department of Health and Human Services and National Institutes of Health Office for the Protection From Research Risks. (1991, June 18). Protection of human subjects: Title 45 Code of Federal Regulations (OPRR, Pt. 46, Vol. 56, No. 28003, Rev.). Washington, DC: Author.
4. Epley, N., & Huff, C. (1998). Suspicion, affective response, and educational benefit as a result of deception in psychology research. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 759-768.
5. Federal Register. (1997, November 10). Protection of human subjects: Suggested revisions to the institutional review board expedited review list, Vol. 62, No. 217, 60607, pp. 1-8.
6. Haase, R. F., & Ellis, M. V. (1987). Multivariate analysis of variance. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 34, 404-413.
7. Leary, M. R., & Altmaier, E. M. (1980). Type I error in counseling research: A plea for multivariate analyses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 27, 611-615.
8. Mosher, D. L. (1988). Balancing the rights of subjects, scientists, and society: 10 principles for human subject committees. Journal of Sex Research, 24, 378-385.
9. Sales, B. D., & Folkman, S. (Eds.). (2000). Ethics in research with human participants. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L S. (1996). Using multivariate statistics (3rd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.