Using stated preference and revealed preference modeling to evaluate prescribing decisions

Health Economics

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 563-573

  Mark, Tami L ^a   Swait, Joffre ^b  

^a MEDSTAT GROUP   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Prescribing decisions; Revealed preference; Stated preference

Indexed keywords

DISULFIRAM; NALTREXONE;

ALCOHOLISM; ANALYTICAL PARAMETERS; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS; DRUG COST; DRUG EFFICACY; DRUG MARKETING; DRUG MECHANISM; DRUG PREFERENCE; EVALUATION; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MODEL; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PERCEPTION; PHYSICIAN; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SIDE EFFECT;

ALCOHOLISM; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIANS; PRESCRIPTIONS, DRUG; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 2942700192     PISSN: 10579230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hec.845     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Louviere JJ, Woodworth G. Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments: an approach based on aggregate data. J Market Res 1983; 20: 350-367.
2. Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2000.
3. Ryan M, Farrar S. Using conjoint analysis to elicit preferences for health care. Br Med J 2000; 320(7248): 1530-1533.
4. Hall J, Kenny P, King M, Louviere J, Viney R, Yeoh A. Using stated preference discrete choice modelling to evaluate the introduction of varicella vaccination. Health Econ 2002; 11(5): 457-465.
5. Bingham MF, Johnson FR, Miller D. Modeling choice behavior for new pharmaceutical products. Value Health 2001; 4(1): 32-44.
6. Cunningham MA, Gaeth GJ, Juang C, Chakraborty G. Using choice-based conjoint to determine the relative importance of dental benefit plan attributes. J Dent Educ 1999; 63(5): 391-399.
7. Booske BC, Sainfort F, Hundt AS. Eliciting consumer preferences for health plans. Health Serv Res 1999; 34(4): 839-854.
8. Harris K, Schultz J, Feldman R. Measuring consumer perceptions of quality differences among competing health benefit plans. J Health Econ 2002; 21(1): 1-17.
9. Bryan S, Gold L, Sheldon R, Buxton M. Preference measurement using conjoint methods: an empirical investigation of reliability. Health Econ 2000; 9(5): 385-395.
10. Moayyedi P, Wardman M, Toner J, Ryan M, Duffett S. Establishing patient preferences for gastroenterology clinic reorganization using conjoint analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002; 14(4): 429-433.
11. Mooney JS, Ryan M, Bruggemann K, Alexander K. The use of conjoint analysis to elicit community preferences in public health research: a case study of hospital services in South Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health 2000; 24(1): 64-70.
12. Ryan M. Using conjoint analysis to take account of patient preferences and go beyond health outcomes: an application to in vitro fertilisation. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48(4): 535-546.
13. Ryan M, Hughes J. Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management. Health Econ 1997; 6(3): 261-273.
14. Vick S, Scott A. Agency in health care. Examining patient's preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship. J Health Econ 1998; 17: 587-605.
15. Van der Pol M, Cairns J. Estimating time preferences for health using discrete choice experiments. Soc Sci Med 2001; 52(9): 1459-1470.
16. Johnson FR, Desvousges WH, Ruby MC et al. Eliciting stated preferences: an application to willingness to pay for longevity. Med Decision Making 1998; 18(Suppl.): S57-S67.
17. Hensher D, Louviere J, Swait J. Combining sources of preference data. J Econometrics 1999; 89: 197-221.
18. Morikawa T. Incorporating stated preference data in travel demand analysis. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1989.
19. Swait J, Louviere J. The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. J Marketing Res 1993; 30: 305-314.
20. Lamb S, Greenlick MR, McCary D. Bridging the Gap Between Practice and Research. National Academy Press: Washington, DC, 1998.
21. Swait J. Non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cutoffs. Transportation Res Part B 2001; 35: 903-928.
22. Klein N, Bither S. An investigation of utility-directed cutoff selection. J Consumer Res 1987; 14: 240-256.
23. Huber J, Klein N. Adapting cutoffs to the choice environment: the effects of attribute correlation and reliability. J Consumer Res 1991; 18: 346-357.
24. Sethuraman R, Cole C, Jain D. Analyzing the effect of information format and task on cutoff search strategies. J Consumer Psychol 1994; 3(2): 103-136.
25. Swait J. A non-compensatory choice model incorporating attribute cutoffs. Transport Res Part B 2001; 35: 903-928.
26. Ben-Akiva M, Lerman S. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1985.
27. Mark TL, Swait J. Using stated preference modeling to forecast the effect of medication attributes on prescriptions of alcoholism medications. Value Health 2003; 6: 474-482.