Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: A comment to Lancsar and Savage (2)

Health Economics

Volumn 13, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 913-918

  Santos Silva, J M C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HUMAN; INCOME; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE PAYMENT; THEORY; WELFARE;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CHOICE BEHAVIOR; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MODELS, ECONOMETRIC; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PROBABILITY; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 4644329493     PISSN: 10579230     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hec.874     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Small KA, Rosen HS. Applied welfare economics with discrete choice models. Econometrica 1981; 49: 105-130.
2. Train KE. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2003.
3. Morey ER, Sharma VR, Mills A. Willingness to pay and determinants of choice for improved malaria treatment in rural Nepal. Social Sci Med 2003; 57: 155-165.
4. de Palma A, Kilani K. Distribution of compensating variations for discrete choice models. Paper presented at the 17th Annual Congress of the European Economic Association, Venice, 2002.
5. Morey ER, Sharma VR, Karlstrom A. A simple method of incorporating income effects into Logit and Nested-Logit models: theory and application. Am J Agr Econ 2003; 85: 250-255.
6. Karlstrom A, Morey ER. Using the expected expenditure formula to calculate the exact expected compensating variation in GEV random utility models with income effects: a primer. Mimeo 2003, University of Colorado- Boulder, http://www.colorado.edu/Economics/morey/papers/ primer.pdf.
7. Trajtenberg M. Economic Analysis of Product Innovation. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA, 1990.
8. Ruud P. Sufficient conditions for consistency of maximum likelihood estimation despite misspecification of the distribution. Econometrica 1983; 51: 225-228.
9. Ruud P. Consistent estimation of limited dependent variable models despite misspecification of the distribution. J Econ 1986; 32: 157-187.
10. Stoker TM. Consistent estimation of scaled coefficients. Econometrica 1986; 54: 1461-1481.
11. Chesher A, Santos Silva JMC. Taste variation in discrete choice models. Rev Econ Stud 2002; 69: 147-168.
12. Louviere JJ, Hensher DA, Swait JD. Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2000.
13. Lancsar EJ. Deriving welfare measures from stated preference discrete choice modelling experiments. CHERE discussion paper no 48. Centre for Health Economics Research and Evaluation, University of Technology, Sydney, 2002.
14. Peracchi F. Econometrics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: Chichester, 2001.
15. Lee MJ. Panel Data Econometrics. Academic Press: San Diego, 2002.