Anthropometric Analysis of the Human Mandibular Cortical Bone as Assessed by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 491-500

  Swasty, Denise ^a   Lee, Janice S ^b   Huang, John C ^c   Maki, Koutaro ^d   Gansky, Stuart A ^e   Hatcher, David ^f   Miller, Arthur J ^c  

^a Starr Orthodontics   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c SHOWA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d SHOWA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f Diagnostic Digital Imaging   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICAL BONE; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HEIGHT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MANDIBLE; MOLAR TOOTH; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PUBIS SYMPHYSIS; SCHOOL CHILD; THICKNESS; TONGUE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; ANATOMY, CROSS-SECTIONAL; BONE DENSITY; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REFERENCE VALUES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 60249096335     PISSN: 02782391     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.089     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Willems G C.C., Naert I.E., and van Steenberghe D. Interdisciplinary treatment planning for orthodontic-prosthetic implant anchorage in a partially edentulous patient. Clin Oral Implants Res 10 (1999) 331
2. Goodacre C.J., Brown D.T., Roberts W.E., et al. Prosthodontic considerations when using implants for orthodontic anchorage. J Prosthet Dent 77 (1997) 162
3. Roberts W.E., Smith R.K., Zilberman Y., et al. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J Orthod 86 (1984) 95
4. Linkow L.I. The endosseous blade implant and its use in orthodontics. Int J Orthod 7 (1969) 140
5. Deguchi T., Nasu M., Murakami K., et al. Qualitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 129 (2006) 721
6. Poggio C.E., and Salvato A. When are implants needed?. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128 (2005) 688
7. Huang L.H., Shotwell J.L., and Wang H.L. Dental implants for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 127 (2005) 713
8. Kingsmill V.J., and Boyde A. Variation in the apparent density of human mandibular bone with age and dental status. J Anat 192 (1998) 233
9. Schubert W., Koblenia B.J., and Pollock R.A. Cross-sectional area of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 55 (1997) 689
10. Schwatz-Dabney C.L., and Dechow P.C. Variations in cortical material properties throughout the human dentate mandible. Am J Physical Anthrop 120 (2003) 252
11. Katranji A., Misch K., and Wang H.L. Cortical bone thickness in dentate and edentulous human cadavers. J Periodontol 78 (2007) 874
12. Steiner C. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod 39 (1953) 720
13. Ricketts R. Evolution of mandibular growth concepts in orthodontic science. Proc Found Orthod Res (1971) 1
14. Bjork A. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. Am J Orthod 55 (1969) 585
15. Adams G.L., Gansky S.A., Miller A.J., et al. Comparison between traditional 2-dimensional cephalometry and a 3-dimensional approach on human dry skulls. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126 (2004) 397
16. Maki K., Miller A.J., Okano T., et al. Changes in cortical bone mineralization in the developing mandible: A three-dimensional quantitative computed tomography study. J Bone Miner Res 15 (2000) 700
17. Mozzo P., Procacci C., Tacconi A., et al. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: Preliminary results. Eur Radiol 8 (1998) 1558
18. Sukovic P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 1 suppl 6 (2003) 31
19. Araki K., Maki K., Seki K., et al. Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial x-ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay): System configuration and physical properties. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33 (2004) 51
20. Loubele M., Maes F., Schutyser F., et al. Assessment of bone segmentation quality of cone-beam CT versus multislice spiral CT: A pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102 (2006) 225
21. Heiland M., Schmelzle R., Hebecker A., et al. Intraoperative 3D imaging of the facial skeleton using the SIREMOBIL Iso-C3D. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33 (2004) 130
22. Tantanapornkul W., Okouchi K., Fujiwara Y., et al. A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 103 (2007) 252
23. Miller A.J., Maki K., and Hatcher D.C. New diagnostic tools in orthodontics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126 (2004) 395
24. Cevidanes L.H., Bailey L.J., Tucker S.F., et al. Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of mandibular changes after orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 131 (2007) 44
25. Cevidanes L.H., Bailey L.J., Tucker Jr. G.R., et al. Superimposition of 3D cone-beam CT models of orthognathic surgery subjects. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 3 (2005) 369
26. Guerrero M.E., Jacobs R., Loubele M., et al. State-of-the-art on cone beam CT imaging for preoperative planning of implant placement. Clin Oral Investig 10 (2006) 1
27. Lin L.I. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 45 (1989) 255
28. Al-Sukhun J., Kelleway J., and Helenius M. Development of a three-dimensional finite element model of a human mandible containing endosseous dental implants. I. Mathematical validation and experimental verification. J Biomed Mater Res A 80 (2007) 234
29. Kohakura S., Kasai K., Ohno I., et al. Relationship between maxillofacial morphology and morphological characteristics of vertical sections of the mandible obtained by CT scanning. J Nihon Univ Sch Dent 39 (1997) 71
30. Tsunori M., Mashita M., and Kasai K. Relationship between facial types and tooth and bone characteristics of the mandible obtained by CT scanning. Angle Orthod 68 (1998) 557
31. Masumoto T., Hayashi I., Kawamura A., et al. Relationships among facial type, buccolingual molar inclination, and cortical bone thickness of the mandible. Eur J Orthod 23 (2001) 15
32. Sato H., Kawamura A., Yamaguchi M., et al. Relationship between masticatory function and internal structure of the mandible based on computed tomography findings. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 128 (2005) 766
33. Mah J., and Hatcher D. Three-dimensional craniofacial imaging. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 126 (2004) 308