Relationship between facial types and tooth and bone characteristics of the mandible obtained by CT scanning

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 557-562

  Tsunori, Masahiro ^a   Mashita, Masamitsu ^a   Kasai, Kazutaka ^a  

^a NIHON UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

CT; Facial type; Mandibular body; Mandibular structure

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE DENSITY; CEPHALOMETRY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ETHNOLOGY; FACE ASYMMETRY; FACIAL BONE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; INDIA; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MASTICATION; MASTICATORY MUSCLE; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH ARCH; TOOTH OCCLUSION;

BITE FORCE; BONE DENSITY; CEPHALOMETRY; DENTAL ARCH; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; FACIAL BONES; HUMANS; INDIA; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MASTICATORY MUSCLES; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TOOTH MIGRATION; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 0032245066     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Proctor AD, De Vincenzo JP. Masseter muscle position relative to dento-facial form. Angle Orthod 1970;40:37-44.
2. Takada K, Lowe AA, Freund VK. Canonical correlations between masticatory muscle orientation and dentoskeletal morphology in children. Am J Orthod 1984;86:331-342.
3. Haskell B, Tetz J. Computer-aided modeling in the assessment of the biomechanical determinants of diverse skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod 1986;89:363-382.
4. Van Spronsen PH, Weijs WA, Prahal-Andersen B, Valk J, Van Ginkel F. A comparison of jaw muscle cross-sections of long-face and normal adults. J Dent Res 1992;71:1279-1285.
5. Kasai K, Richards LC, Kanazawa E, Ozaki T, Iwasawa T. Relationship between attachment of the superficial masseter muscle and craniofacial morphology in dentate and edentulous humans. J Dent Res 1994;73(6):1142-1149.
6. Braun S, Hnat WP, Marcotte MR. A study of bite force, part 1: Relationship to various physical characteristics. Angle Orthod 1995;65:367-372.
7. Braun S, Hnat WP, Marcotte MR. A study of bite force, part 2: Relationship to various cephalometric measurements. Angle Orthod 1995;65:373-377.
8. Ricketts RM, Roth RH, Chaconas SJ, Schulhof RJ, Engel GA. Orthodontic diagnosis and planning. Rocky Mountain/Orthodontics, USA, 1982
9. Okada N, Kasai K. Relationship between mandibular tooth inclination and maxillofacial morphology using CT scanning. Nihon Univ J Oral Sci 1996;22:381-392. (Japanese)
10. Kasai K, Moro T, Kanazawa E, Iwasawa T. Relationship between cranial base and maxillofacial morphology. Eur J Orthod 1995;17:403-410.
11. Wylie WL, Johnson EL. Rapid evaluation of facial hyperplasia in the vertical plane. Angle Orthod 1952;22:165-182.
12. Ghafari J, Brin I, Kelly MB. Mandibular rotation and lower face height. Angle Orthod 1989;59:31-36.
13. Kasai K, Enomoto Y, Ogawa T, Kawasaki Y, Kanazawa E, Iwasawa T. Morphological characteristics of vertical sections of the mandible obtained by CT scanning. Anthrop Sci 1996;104:187-198.
14. Bishara SE, Jakobsen JR. Longitudinal changes in three normal facial types. Am J Orthod 1985;88:466-502.
15. Zaher AR, Bishara SE, Jakobsen RJ. Posttreatment changes in different facial types. Angle Orthod 1994;64:425-436.
16. Horn AJ. Facial height index. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1992;102:180-186.
17. Ingervell B, Thilander B. Relation between facial morphology and activity of masticatory muscles. J Oral Rehabil 1974;1:131-147.
18. Tabe T. A study of the activities in the masticatory muscles and the morphology of the orofacial skeleton. II. The correlation between the activities in the masseter muscle and the biting force,and the morphology of the orofacial skeleton. J Jpn Orthod Soc 1976;35:255-265. (Japanese)
19. Möller E. The chewing apparatus. Acta Physiol Scand 1966;69 (Suppl. 280):1-229.