Approximate solutions of moral dilemmas in multiple agent system

Knowledge and Information Systems

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 157-181

  Cristani, Matteo ^a   Burato, Elisa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DECISION THEORY; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

APPROXIMATE SOLUTION; DECISION CRITERIONS; DEONTIC LOGIC; LOCAL ORDERING; MAKING DECISION; MULTIPLE AGENT SYSTEMS; MULTIPLE AGENTS; SIMPLE APPROACH;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 59849124783     PISSN: 02191377     EISSN: 02193116     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10115-008-0172-0     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Bacchus F, Grove A (1996) Utility independence in a qualitative decision theory. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on knowledge representation and reasoning (KR '96). Morgan Kaufmann, 1996
2. Bacchus F, Grove A (1997) Independence and qualitative decision theory. In: Working notes of the stanford spring symposium on qualitative decision theory, Stanford, CA, 1997
3. Boyssou D, Vincke Ph (1998) Topics on preference modelling. In: Annals of operation research, 80. Preface to the special issue on preference modelling
4. Castelfranchi C. (2005) Commitments: From individual intentions to groups and organizations. In: Lesser V. (eds) Proceedings of the 1st international conference on multi-agent systems (ICMAS 95). MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, pp 41-48
5. Dowling C (2000) Intelligent agents: Some ethical issues and dilemmas. In: CSPIT '00: selected papers from the second Australian Institute conference on Computer ethics, pp 28-32, Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia, 2000. Australian Computer Society, Inc
6. Doyle J, Wellman M (1994) Representing preferences as ceteris paribus comparatives. In: Hanks S, Russel S, Wellman M (eds) Working notes of the AAAI spring symposium on decision-theoretic planning, Stanford, CA, 1994
7. Goble L (2005) A logic for deontic dilemmas. J Appl Logic 3(3-4):461-483
8. Ha V, Haddawy P (1998) Towards case-based preference elicitation: similarity measures on preference structures. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth conference on uncertainty in artificial intelligence, pp 193-201, July 1998
9. Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York
10. Marino P (2001) Moral dilemmas, collective responsibility, and moral progress. Philos Stud (104):203-225
11. Roubens M, Vincke Ph (1985) Preference nodelling. In: Number 250 in Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems, p 94. Springer, Berlin
12. van der Torre L (2003) Contextual deontic logic: Normative agents, violations and independence. Ann Math Artificial Intell 37(1):33-63
13. Governatori G., Rotolo A. (2004) Defeasible logic: Agency, intention and obligation. In: Lomuscio A, Nute D. (eds) Deontic logic in computer science, lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin, pp 114-128
14. Holbo J (2002) Moral dilemmas and the logic of obligation. Am Philos Quart 39(3):259-274
15. Pereira LM, Saptawijaya A (2007) Modelling morality with prospective logic. In: Number 4874 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence