Lumbar spinal arthroplasty: Analysis of one center's twenty best and twenty worst clinical outcomes

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 23, 2008, Pages 2566-2569

  Guyer, Richard D ^a,b   Siddiqui, Siqib ^a   Zigler, Jack E ^a   Ohnmeiss, Donna D ^a   Blumenthal, Scott L ^a   Sachs, Barton L ^a   Hochschuler, Stephen H ^a   Rashbaum, Ralph F ^a  

^a TEXAS BACK INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b TX Back Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Clinical outcome; Outcome predictors; Prospective study; Total disc replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA BASE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMPLANTATION; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL DISC ARTHROPLASTY; UNITED STATES; WORK EXPERIENCE; ADOLESCENT; DISABILITY; HOSPITALIZATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; JOINT PROSTHESIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; JOINT PROSTHESIS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 59649120529     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318185941a     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Blumenthal SL, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, et al. A prospective, randomized, multi-center FDA IDE study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITÉ ™ artificial disc vs. lumbar fusion: part I-evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 2005;30:1565-75.
2. Cinotti G, David T, Postacchini F. Results of disc prosthesis after a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. Spine 1996;21:995-1000.
3. Leahy M, Zigler JE, Ohnmeiss DD, et al. Comparison of results of total disc replacement in post-discectomy patients versus patients with no previous lumbar surgery. Spine 2008;33:1694-95.
4. Lemaire J, Carrier H, Ali ES, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes with the CHARITE artificial disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18:353-9.
5. Tropiano P, Huang RC, Girardi FP, et al. Lumbar total disc replacement. seven to eleven-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:490-6.
6. Le Huec J-C, Basso Y, Aunoble S, et al. Influence of facet and posterior muscle degeneration on clinical results of lumbar total disc replacement: two-year follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18:219-23.
7. Block AR, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, et al. The use of presurgical psychological screening to predict the outcome of spine surgery. Spine J 2001;1: 274-82.
8. Block AR, Gatchel RJ, Deardorff WW, et al. In: Block AR, ed. The Psychology of Spine Surgery.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2003.
9. Epker J, Block AR. Presurgical psychological screening in back pain patients: a review. Clin J Pain 2001;17:200-5.
10. Hagg O, Fritzell P, Ekselius L, et al. Predictors of outcome in fusion surgery for chronic low back pain. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study. Eur Spine J 2003;12:22-33.
11. LaCaille RA, DeBerard MS, Masters KS, et al. Presurgical biopsychosocial factors predict multidimensional patient: outcomes of interbody cage lumbar fusion. Spine J 2005;5:71- 8.
12. Spengler DM, Freeman C, Westbrook R, et al. Low-back pain following multiple lumbar spine procedures. Failure of initial selection? Spine 1980;5: 356-60.
13. Trief PM, Grant W, Fredrickson B. A prospective study of psychological predictors of lumbar surgery outcome. Spine 2000;25:2616-21.
14. Bertagnoli R, Kumar S. Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J 2002;11(suppl 2):S131-S136.
15. Zeegers WS, Bohnen LM, Laaper M, et al. Artificial disc replacement with the modular type SB Charite III: 2-year results in 50 prospectively studied patients. Eur Spine J 1999;8:210-7.
16. Karasek M, Bogduk N. Twelve-month follow-up of a controlled trial of intradiscal thermal anuloplasty for back pain due to internal disc disruption. Spine 2000;25 2601-7.
17. McAfee PC, Cunningham B, Holsapple G, et al. A Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc replacement versus lumbar fusion. Spine 2005;30:1576-83.
18. Mannion AF, Elfering A. Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment. Eur Spine J 2006;15:S93-S108.
19. Bertagnoli R, Yue JJ, Kershaw T, et al. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty utilizing the ProDisc prosthesis in smokers versus nonsmokers. A prospective study with 2-year minimum follow-up. Spine 2006;31:992-7.