Comparison of results of total disc replacement in postdiscectomy patients versus patients with no previous lumbar surgery

Spine

Volumn 33, Issue 15, 2008, Pages 1690-1693

  Leahy, Michael ^a   Zigler, Jack E ^a,b   Ohnmeiss, Donna D ^a   Rashbaum, Ralph F ^a   Sachs, Barton L ^a  

^a TEXAS BACK INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b TX Back Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

Artificial disc; Lumbar spine; Postdiscectomy; Prospective study; Symptomatic disc degeneration; Total disc replacement

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; LUMBAR SPINE; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SPINE SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; ARTHROPLASTY; INSTRUMENTATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK HERNIA; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; REOPERATION; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; DISKECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 50949084374     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817bd2f0     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Yorimitsu E, Chiba K, Toyama Y, et al. Long-term outcomes of standard discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a follow-up study of more than 10 years. Spine 2001;26:652-7.
2. Frymoyer JW, Hanley E, Howe J, et al. Disc excision and spine fusion in the management of lumbar disc disease. A minimum ten-year follow-up. Spine 1978;3:l-6.
3. Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, et al. Long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical management of sciatica secondary to a lumbar disc herniation: 10 year results from the Maine lumbar spine study. Spine 2005;30:927-35.
4. Loupasis GA, Stamos K, Katonis PG, et al. Seven- to 20-year outcome of lumbar discectomy. Spine 1999;24:2313-7.
5. Jackson RK, Boston DA, Edge AJ. Lateral mass fusion. A prospective study of a consecutive series with long term follow up. Spine 1985;10:828-32.
6. O'Bierne J, O'Neill D, Williams DH. Spinal fusion for back pain: a clinical and radiological review. J Spin Disord 1992;5:32-8.
7. Fritsch E, Heisel J, Rupp S. The failed back surgery syndrome: reasons, intraoperative findings, and long-term results: A report of 182 operative treatments. Spine 1996;21:626-33.
8. Weinhoffer SL, Guyer RD, Herbert M, et al. In-vitro intradiscal pressure measurements above a simulated instrumented fusion. Spine 1995;20: 526-31.
9. Cunningham BW, Kotani Y, McNulty PS, et al. The effect of spinal destabilization and instrumentation on lumbar intradiscal pressure: an in vitro biomechanical analysis. Spine 1997:22:2655-63.
10. Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN, et al. Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg 2004;86-A: 1497-503.
11. Blumenthal SL, McAfee PC, Guyer RD, et al. A prospective, randomized, multi-center FDA IDE study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITÉ™ artificial disc vs. lumbar fusion: Part I-evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 2005;30:1565-75.
12. Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM, et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 2007;32: 1155-62.
13. Wenger M, Markwalder T. A novel surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation in patients with long-standing degenerative disc disease. J Neurosurg 2005;2:515-20.
14. Choi JY, Choi YW, Sung KH. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in patients with a previous discectomy: minimum 2-year follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18:347-52.