Effects of early release from prison using electronic tagging in Sweden

Journal of Experimental Criminology

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 41-61

  Marklund, Fredrik ^a   Holmberg, Stina ^a  

^a National Council for Crime Prevention   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Electronic monitoring (EM); Evaluation; House arrest; House detention; Intensive supervision by electronic monitoring (ISEM); Offender; Parole; Recidivism; Reoffending; Tagging

Indexed keywords

EID: 59549107447     PISSN: 15733750     EISSN: 15728315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11292-008-9064-2     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. J. Bonta S. M. Wallace-Capretta J. Rooney 2000 Can electronic monitoring make a difference? An evaluation of three Canadian programs Crime and Delinquency 46 2 61 75
2. Brottsförebyggande rådet (2005). Kriminalvårdens särskilda narkotikasatsning - en utvärdering av arbetet under åren 2002-2004. (2005:3). (Stockholm: Fritzes)
3. Brottsförebyggande rådet (2007). Kriminalstatistik 2006. (Stockholm: Fritzes)
4. M. A. Finn S. Muirhead-Steves 2002 The effectiveness of electronic monitoring with violent male parolees Justice Quarterly 19 2 293 312
5. Kriminalvårdsstyrelsen (2005). Kriminalvård och statistik 2004. (Norrköping: Kriminalvårdsstyrelsen)
6. Nilsson, A. (2002). Fånge I marginalen-uppväxtvillkor, levnadsförhållanden och återfall I brott bland fångar. Stockholm: Kriminologiska institutionen, Stockholms universitet.
7. M. Renzema E. Mayo-Wilson 2005 Can electronic monitoring reduce crime for moderate to high-risk offenders? Journal of Experimental Criminology 2 215 237
8. Sugg, D., Moore, L., & Howard, P. (2001). Electronic monitoring and offending behaviour-reconviction results for the second year of trials of curfew orders, (research finding no. 141). London: Home Office.
9. Taylor, R (1999). Predicting reconvictions for sexual and violent offences using the revised offender group reconviction scale. Research finding no 104. London: Home Office.
10. Weisburd, D., Waring, E., & Chayet, E. (1995). Specific deterrence in a sample of offenders convicted of white collar crimes. Criminology, 33(4).