Knee stability before and after total and unicondylar knee replacement: In vivo kinematic evaluation utilizing navigation

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 202-207

  Casino, Daniela ^a   Martelli, Sandra ^a   Zaffagnini, Stefano ^a   Lopomo, Nicola ^a   Iacono, Francesco ^a   Bignozzi, Simone ^a   Visani, Andrea ^a   Marcacci, Maurilio ^a  

^a RIZZOLI ORTHOPAEDIC INSTITUTE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Computer assisted surgery; Knee kinematics; Knee replacement; Screw home; Screw home mechanism

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; KINEMATICS; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE INSTABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VARUS KNEE; AGED; BIOMECHANICS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONVALESCENCE; FEMALE; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; TIBIA;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SOFTWARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIBIA;

EID: 59449083015     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20746     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Moschella D, Blasi A, Leardini A, et al. 2006. Wear patterns on tibial plateau from varus osteoarthritic knees. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21:152-158.
2. Suggs JF, Li G, Park SE, et al. 2006. Knee biomechanics after UKA and its relation to the ACL-A robotic investigation. J Orthop Res 24:588-594.
3. Most E, Li G, Sultan PG, et al. 2005. Kinematic analysis of conventional and high-flexion cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties: an in vitro investigation. J Arthroplasty 20:529-535.
4. Patil S, Colwell CW Jr, Ezzet KA, et al. 2005. Can normal knee kinematics be restored with unicompartmental knee replacement? J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:332-338.
5. Suggs JF, Hanson GR, Park SE, et al. 2008. Patient function after a posterior stabilizing total knee arthroplasty: cam-post engagement and knee kinematics. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:290-296.
6. Shi K, Hayashida K, Umeda N, et al. 2008. Kinematic comparison between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing inserts in NexGen legacy posterior stabilized flex total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23:164-169.
7. Delport HP, Banks SA, De Schepper J, et al. 2006. A kinematic comparison of fixed- and mobile-bearing knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1016-1021.
8. Li G, Most E, Sultan PG, et al. 2004. Knee kinematics with a high-flexion posterior stabilized total knee prosthesis: an in vitro robotic experimental investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:1721-1729.
9. Banks SA, Markovich GD, Hodge WA. 1997. In vivo kinematics of cruciate-retaining and -substituting knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 12:297-304.
10. Stiehl JB, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, et al. 1999. In vivo determination of condylar lift-off and screw-home in a mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 14:293-299.
11. Hoff WA, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, et al. 1998. Three-dimensional determination of femoral-tibial contact positions under in vivo conditions using fluoroscopy. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 13:455-472.
12. Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Hoff WA, et al. 1996. In vivo knee kinematics derived using an inverse perspective technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:107-117.
13. Stiehl JB, Komistek RD, Dennis DA, et al. 1995. Fluoroscopic analysis of kinematics after posterior-cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:884-889.
14. Buckup K, Linke LC, Hahne V. 2007. Minimally invasive implantation and computer navigation for a unicondylar knee system. Orthopedics 30(Suppl):66-69.
15. Siston RA, Giori NJ, Goodman SB, et al. 2006. Intraoperative passive kinematics of osteoarthritic knees before and after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res 24:1607-1614.
16. Jenny JY, Boeri C. 2003. Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:40-45.
17. Delp SL, Stulberg SD, Davies B, et al. 1998. Computer assisted knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:49-56.
18. Matziolis G, Krocker D, Weiss U, et al. 2007. A prospective, randomized study of computer-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty. Three-dimensional evaluation of implant alignment and rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:236-243.
19. Ensini A, Catani F, Leardini A, et al. 2007. Alignments and clinical results in conventional and navigated total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 457:156-162.
20. Jenny JY. 2008. The current status of computer-assisted high tibial osteotomy, unicompartmental knee replacement, and revision total knee replacement. Instr Course Lect 57:721-726.
21. Mihalko WM, Ali M, Phillips MJ, et al. 2008. Passive knee kinematics before and after total knee arthroplasty: are we correcting pathologic motion? J Arthroplasty 23:57-60.
22. Picard F, Deakin AH, Clarke IV, et al. 2007. A quantitative method of effective soft tissue management for varus knees in total knee replacement surgery using navigational techniques. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 221:763-772.
23. Klein GR, Parvizi J, Rapuri VR, et al. 2004. The effect of tibial polyethylene insert design on range of motion: evaluation of in vivo knee kinematics by a computerized navigation system during total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:986-991.
24. Cromie MJ, Siston RA, Giori NJ, et al. 2008. Posterior cruciate ligament removal contributes to abnormal knee motion during posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res [Epub ahead of print].
25. Martelli S, Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, et al. 2007. KIN-Nav navigation system for kinematic assessment in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: features, use, and perspectives. Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 221:725-737.
26. Martelli S, Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, et al. 2007. Description and validation of a navigation system for intra-operative evaluation of knee laxity. Comput Aided Surg 12:181-188.
27. Martelli S, Lopomo N, Greggio S, et al. 2006. Development and applications of a software tool for diarthrodial joint analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 83:50-56.
28. Grood ES, Suntay WJ. 1983. A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. ASME J Biomech Eng 105:136-144.
29. Krackow KA, Bayers-Thering M, Phillips MJ, et al. 1999. A new technique for determining proper mechanical axis alignment during total knee arthroplasty: progress toward computer-assisted TKA. Orthopedics 22:698-702.
30. Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, Martelli S, et al. 2006. New intraoperative protocol for kinematic evaluation of ACL reconstruction: preliminary results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:811-816.
31. Martelli S, Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, et al. 2006. Validation of a new protocol for computer-assisted evaluation of kinematics of double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 21:279-287.
32. Dennis DA, Mahfouz MR, Komistek RD, et al. 2005. In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics. J Biomech 38:241-253.
33. Iwaki H, Pinskerova V, Freeman MA. 2000. Tibiofemoral movement 1: the shapes and relative movements of the femur and tibia in the unloaded cadaver knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:1189-1195.
34. Boyer P, Djian P, Christel P, et al. 2004. Reliability of the KT-1000 arthrometer (Medmetric) for measuring anterior knee laxity: comparison with Telos in 147 knees. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 90:757-764.
35. Ganko L, Engebretsen L, Ozer H. 2000. The Rolimeter: a new arthrometer compared with the KT-1000. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:36-39.
36. Colwell CW, Patil S, Ezzet K, et al. 2004. Differences in knee kinematics after unicondylar and total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87-A(Suppl. III):342-343.