Minimal and maximal goal orientation and reactions to norm violations

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-21

  Fritsche, Immo ^a   Kessler, Thomas ^a   Mummendey, Amélie ^a   Neumann, Jörg ^a  

^a FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 59349106690     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: 10990992     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.481     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
2. Branscombe, N. R., Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (1999). The context and content of social identity threat. In N. Ellemers, & R. Spears (Eds.), Social identity: Context, commitment, content (pp. 35-58). Oxford, England: Blackwell Science.
3. Brendl, C. M., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Principles of judging valence: What makes events positive or negative?. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 95-160). San Diego: Academic Press.
4. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park: Sage.
5. Castano, E. (2004). On the advantages of reifying the ingroup. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception. Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 1-22). New York: Psychology Press.
6. Freitas, A. L., Liberman, N., Salovey, P., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). When to begin? Regulatory focus and initiating goal pursuit. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 121-130.
7. Hänze, M. (2002). Bedürfnis nach Struktur und Furcht vor Festlegung. Psychometrische Analysen einer deutschsprachigen Skala zur Erfassung der Konstrukte "Personal Need for Structure", "Personal Fear of Invalidity" und "Need for Closure". [Need for structure and fear of determining. Psychometric analyses of a German scale for the measurement of the constructs "Personal Need for Structure", "Personal Fear of Invalidity" and "Need for Closure"]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 23, 327-338.
8. Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
9. Higgins, E. T. (2005). Description of the strength measure. Retrieved December 14, 2005 from http://www.columbia.edu/cu/psychology/higgins/ strengthmeasure.doc
10. Higgins, E. T., Friedman, R. S., Harlow, R. E., Chen Idson, L., Ayduk, O. N., & Taylor, A. (2001). Achievement orientations from subjective histories of success: Promotion pride versus prevention pride. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 3-23.
11. Higgins, E. T., Shah, J., & Friedman, R. (1997). Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 515-525.
12. Kessler, T., Neumann, J., Mummendey, A., Schubert, T., & Waldzus, S. (2007). Minimal versus maximal orientation as determinants of explicit negative treatment of others. Manuscript submitted for publication.
13. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing". Psychological Review, 103, 263-283.
14. Kruglanski, A. W., Webster, D. M., & Klem, A. (1993). Motivated resistance and openness to persuasion in the presence or absence of prior information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 861-876.
15. Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854-864.
16. Mummendey, A., & Waldzus, S. (2002). Psychologische Grenzen von Toleranz. Voraussetzungen und Determinanten expliziter Ablehnung und Ausgrenzung von Fremdgruppen [The psychological bounds of tolerance. Preconditions and determinants of explicit rejection and exclusion of outgroups] (Unpublished Manuscript).
17. Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (1999). Social discrimination and tolerance in intergroup relations: Reactions to intergroup difference. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 158-174.
18. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2005). SPSS and SAS macros for estimating and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Retrieved March 2, 2007, from. http://www.comm.ohio-state.edu/ahayes/SPSS%20programs/ indirect.htm.
19. Rammstedt, B. (2004). Wie kurz kann ein Persönlichkeitsfragebogen sein? Die Erfassung der fünf Persönlichkeitsdimensionen mit 10 Items [How short can a personality questionnaire be? The measurement of the five personality dimensions on 10 items]. Poster session presented at the 44. Kongress der deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie, Göttingen, Germany.
20. Schubert, T., Mummendey, A., Waldzus, S., & Kessler, T. (2006). Minimal goals and the social exclusion of goal violators: The good, the not so good, and the ugly. Unpublished manuscript.
21. Shah, J., Higgins, T., & Friedman, R. S. (1998). Performance incentives and means: How regulatory focus influences goal attainment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 285-293.
22. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
23. Thompson, M. M., Naccarato, M. E., Parker, K. C. H., & Moskowitz, G. B. (1992). Measuring cognitive needs: The development and validation of the Personal Need for Structure and Personal Fear of Invalidity scales. Unpublished manuscript, University of Waterloo.
24. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group; A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
25. Wolfradt, U., & Rademacher, J. (1999). Interpersonale Ambiguitätsintoleranz als klinisches Differentialkriterium: Skalenentwicklung und Validierung [Interpersonal intolerance of ambiguity as a clinical differential criterion: Scale development and validation]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 20, 72-79.