Evaluation of a personalized digital library based on cognitive styles: Adaptivity vs. adaptability

International Journal of Information Management

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 48-56

  Frias Martinez, Enrique ^a   Chen, Sherry Y ^a   Liu, Xiaohui ^a  

^a BRUNEL UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cognitive styles; Digital libraries; Individual differences; Personalization

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

ADAPTIVE VERSIONS; ADAPTIVITY; COGNITIVE STYLES; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS; PERSONALIZATIONS; PROVIDE GUIDANCES;

DIGITAL LIBRARIES;

EID: 59349099782     PISSN: 02684012     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2008.01.012     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adams, A., & Blandford, A. (2002). Digital libraries in academia: Challenges and changes. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Asian digital libraries (ICADL 2002) (pp. 392-403).
2. Callan, J., Smeaton, A., Beaulieu, M., Borlund, P., Brusilovsky, P., & Chalmers, M., et al. (2003). Personalization and recommender systems in digital libraries. In Proceedings of the second DELOS workshop on personalization and recommender systems in digital libraries.
3. Candela, L., & Straccia, U. (2003). The personalized, collaborative digital library environment CYCLADES and its collections management. Distributed multimedia information retrieval-SIGIR 2003 workshop on distributed information retrieval. Lecture Note in Computer Science (Vol. 2924, pp. 156-172).
4. Chen, S. Y. (2002). The relationships between individual differences and the quality of learning outcomes in web-based instruction. In Proceedings of the ICEB second international conference on electronic business (pp. 345-351).
5. Chin, J. P., Diehl, V. A., & Normal, K. L. (1988). Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface. In ACM CHI'88 Proceedings (pp. 213-218).
6. Chou, C., & Lin, H. (1997). Navigation maps in a computer-networked hypertext learning system. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the association for educational communications and technology, Albuquerque, NM, February 12-16, 1997.
7. Cohen, S., Fereira, J., Horne, A., Kibbee, B., Mistlebauer, H., & Smith, A. (2000). MyLibrary, personalized electronic services in the Cornell University Library. D-Lib Magazine, 6(4), URL 〈http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april00/mistlebauer/04mistlebauer.html〉.
8. Davis J.K., and Cochran K.F. An information processing view of field dependence-independence. Early Child Development and Care 51 (1989) 31-47
9. Di Giacomo, M., Mahoney, D., Bollen, J., Monroy-Hernandez, A., & Ruiz-Meraz, C. M. (2001). MyLibrary, a personalized service for digital library environments. In Proceedings of the second DELOS workshop on personalization and recommender systems in digital libraries.
10. Fink J., and Kobsa A. A review and analysis of commercial user modeling servers for personalization on the world wide web. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 9 34 (2000) 209-249
11. Finlater, L., & McGrenere, J. (2004). A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus. In Proceedings of CHI 2004.
12. Ford N. Cognitive styles and virtual environments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51 6 (2000) 543-555
13. Ford N., Miller D., and Moss N. Web search strategies and human individual differences: Cognitive and demographic factors, Internet attitudes, and approaches. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56 (2005) 741-756
14. Ford N., Wilson T.D., Foster A., Ellis D., and Spink A. Information seeking and mediated searching. Part 4: Cognitive styles and individual differences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 9 (2002) 728-735
15. Frias-Martinez, E., Chen, S. Y., & Liu, X. (2008). Investigation of behavior and perception of digital library users: A cognitive style perspective. International Journal of Information Management. 28(5), 355-365.
16. Goodenough D. The role of individual differences in field dependence as a factor in learning and memory. Psychological Bulletin 83 (1976) 675-694
17. Ivory M.Y., and Megraw R. Evolution of web site design patterns. ACM Transactions on Information System 23 (2005) 463-497
18. Jameson, A., & Schwarzkopf, E. (2002). Pros and cons of controllability: An empirical study. In Proceedings of adaptive hypermedia 2002 (pp. 193-202).
19. Kay J. Learner control. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 11 1/2 (2001) 111-127
20. Kim, H., Yun, M., & Kim, P. (2004). A comparison of web searching strategies according to cognitive styles of elementary students. Lecture Note in Computer Science (Vol. 3044, pp. 892-901).
21. Lewis J.R. IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for user. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 7 (1995) 57-78
22. Liaw S.S., and Huang H.M. An investigation of user attitudes toward search engines as an information retrieval tool. Computers in Human Behavior 19 (2003) 751-765
23. Lyons-Lawrence C.L. Effects of learning styles on performance in using computer-based instruction in office systems. The Delta Pi Epsilon Journal 36 3 (1994) 166-175
24. Marchionini G., Plaisant C., and Komlodi A. The people in digital libraries: Multifaceted approaches to assessing needs and impact. In: Bishop A., van House N.A., and Buttenfield B.P. (Eds). Digital library use social practice in design and evaluation (2003), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 119-160
25. McGrenere J., Baecker R.M., and Booth K.S. An evaluation of a multiple interface design solution for bloated software. ACM CHI Letters 4 1 (2002) 163-170
26. McKeown, K. R., Elhadad, N., & Hatzivassiglou, V. (2003). Leveraging a common representation for personalized search and summarization in a medical digital library. In Proceedings of the 2003 joint conference on digital libraries, JCDL03 (pp. 159-173).
27. Palmquist R.A., and Kim K. Cognitive style and on-line database search experience as predictors of Web search performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51 6 (2000) 558-566
28. Reiff K. At-risk middle level or field dependent learners. Clearing House 69 4 (1996) 231-234
29. Riding R.J. Cognitive styles analysis (1991), Learning and Training Technology, Birmingham
30. Riding R.J., and Grimley M. Cognitive style, gender, and learning from multimedia materials in 11 year-old children. British Journal of Education Technology 30 1 (1999) 43-56
31. Riding R.J., and Rayner S.G. Cognitive styles and learning strategies (1998), David Fulton Publisher, London
32. Scanlon E. How gender influences learners working coloratively with science simulations. Learning and Instruction 10 (2000) 463-481
33. Semeraro, G., Costabile, M. F., Esposito, F., & Fanzini, N. (1999). Machine learning techniques for adaptive user interfaces in a corporate digital library service. In Proceedings of the ACAI-99 workshop on machine learning in user modelling (pp. 21-29).
34. Spink A., Wilson T.D., Ford N.A., Foster A., and Ellis D. Information seeking and mediated searching. Part I: Background and research design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53 9 (2002) 695-703
35. Stelmaszewska H., and Blandford A. From physical to digital: A case study of computer scientists' behaviour in physical libraries. International Journal on Digital Libraries 4 2 (2004) 82-92
36. Stephanidis, C., Savidis, A., & Akoumianakis, D. (1995). Towards user interfaces for all. In Conference proceedings of second TIDE congress (pp. 167-170).
37. Treiblmaier, H., Madlberger, M., Knotzer, N., & Pollach, I. (2004). Evaluating personalization and customization from an ethical point of view: An empirical study. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii international conference on system sciences.
38. Tsandilas T., and Schraefel M.C. Usable adaptive hypermedia systems. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 10 1 (2004) 5-29
39. Weller H.G., Repman J., and Rooze G.E. The relationship of learning, behaviour, and cognitive styles in hypermedia-based instruction: Implications for design of HBI. Computers in the Schools 10 (1994) 401-420
40. Winter K. MyLibrary can help your library. American Libraries 30 7 (1999) 57-65
41. Witkin H.A., Moore C.A., Goodenough D.R., and Cox P.W. Field-dependent and field independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research 47 (1977) 1-64