Explaining responsiveness in collaboration: Administrator and citizen role perceptions

Public Administration Review

Volumn 69, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 271-283

  Bryer, Thomas A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 59349098597     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: 15406210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.01973.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Arndt, Margarete, and Barbara Bigelow. 2000. Presenting Structural Innovation in an Institutional Environment: Hospitals' Use of Impression Management. Administrative Science Quarterly 45 (3 494 522.
2. Bryer, Thomas A. 2007a. Negotiating Bureaucratic Responsiveness in Collaboration with Citizens: Findings from Action Research in Los Angeles. PhD diss., University of Southern California.
3. Bryer, Thomas A. 2007b. Toward a Relevant Agenda for a Responsive Public Administration. Journal of Public Organization Research and Theory 17 (3 479 500.
4. Bryer, Thomas A., and Terry L. Cooper. 2007. Challenges in Enhancing Responsiveness in Neighborhood Governance. Public Performance and Management Review 31 (2 191 214.
5. Cigler, Beverly A. 1999. Pre-Conditions for the Emergence of Multicommunity Collaborative Projects. Policy Studies Review 16 (1 86 102.
6. Cooper, Terry L. 1991. An Ethic of Citizenship for Public Administration. Englewood Cliffs, NJ : Prentice Hall.
7. Cooper, Terry L., and Thomas A. Bryer. 2007a. Collaboration between Los Angeles City Departments and Neighborhood Councils: Findings and Recommendations from the Collaborative Learning Project. Los Angeles : Urban Initiative, University of Southern California.
8. Cooper, Terry L., and Thomas A. Bryer. 2007b. William Robertson: Exemplar of Politics and Public Management Rightly Understood. Public Administration Review 67 (5 816 23.
9. Cooper, Terry L., Thomas A. Bryer, and Jack W. Meek. 2008. Outcomes Achieved through Citizen-Centered Collaborative Public Management. In Big Ideas in Collaborative Public Management, edited by Rosemary O'Leary and Lisa Blomgren Bingham, 211 29. Armonk, NY : M. E. Sharpe.
10. Cooper, Terry L., and Terry L. Lui. 1990. Democracy and the Administrative State: The Case of Hong Kong. Public Administration Review 50 (3 332 44.
11. Denhardt, Robert B., and Janet Vinzant Denhardt. 2000. The New Public Service: Serving Rather than Steering. Public Administration Review 60 (6 549 59.
12. Garrett, R. Sam, James A. Thurber, A. Lee Fritschler, and David H. Rosenbloom. 2006. Assessing the Impact of Bureaucracy Bashing by Electoral Campaigns. Public Administration Review 6 (2 228 40.
13. Glaser, Barney G., and Anselm L. Strauss. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago : Aldine.
14. Harter, Philip J. 1997. Fear of Commitment: An Affliction of Adolescents. Duke Law Journal 46 (6 1389 1428.
15. Hill, Larry B. 1991. Who Governs the American Administrative State? A Bureaucratic-Centered Image of Governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 1 (3 261 94.
16. Ingraham, Patricia W. 2006. Who Should Rule? In Revisiting Waldo's Administrative State: Constancy and Change in Public Administration, edited by David H. Rosenbloom and Howard E. McCurdy, 71 86. Washington, DC : Georgetown University Press.
17. Kathi, Pradeep C., and Terry L. Cooper. 2005. Democratizing the Administrative State: Connecting Neighborhood Councils and City Agencies. Public Administration Review 65 (5) 559 67.
18. Klitgaard, Robert, and Gregory F. Treverton. 2003. Assessing Partnerships: New Forms of Collaboration. Washington, DC : IBM Endowment for the Business of Government.
19. Lawther, Wendell C. 2002. Contracting for the 21st Century: A Partnership Model. Washington, DC : IBM Center for the Business of Government.
20. Lewicki, Roy J. 2006. Trust, Trust Development, and Trust Repair. In The Handbook of Conflict Resolution: Theory and Practice, edited by Morton Deutsch, 92 119. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
21. Margerum, Richard D. 2002. Evaluating Collaborative Planning: Implications from an Empirical Analysis of Growth Management. Journal of the American Planning Association 68 (2 179 93.
22. Moe, Ronald. 1994. The "Reinventing Government" Exercise: Misinterpreting the Problem, Misjudging the Consequences. Public Administration Review 54 (2 111 22.
23. Osborne, David, and Ted Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit Is Transforming the Public Sector from Schoolhouse to Statehouse, City Hall to the Pentagon. Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
24. Painter, Martin. 2005. Transforming the Administrative State: Reform in Hong Kong and the Future of the Developmental State. Public Administration Review 65 (3 335 46.
25. Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Gerald R. Salancik. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York : Harper & Row.
26. Pitkin, Hanna F. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley : University of California Press.
27. Provan, Keith G., and H. Brinton Milward. 2001. Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks. Public Administration Review 61 (4 414 23.
28. Ryan, Gery W., and H. Russell Bernard. 2003. Techniques to Identify Themes. Field Methods 15 (1 85 109.
29. Svara, James H. 1998. The Politics-Administration Dichotomy Model as Aberration. Public Administration Review 58 (1 51 58.
30. Taylor, Frederick Winslow. 1967. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York : W. W. Norton.
31. Vigoda, Eran. 2002. From Responsiveness to Collaboration: Governance, Citizens, and the Next Generation of Public Administration. Public Administration Review 62 (5 527 40.
32. Waldo, Dwight. 1948. The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration. New York : Holmes and Meier.
33. Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Translated by Günther Roth and Claus Wittich. Berkeley : University of California Press.
34. Yang, Kaifeng. 2005. Public Administrators' Trust in Citizens: A Missing Link in Citizen Involvement Efforts. Public Administration Review 65 (3 273 85.
35. Yang, Kaifeng. 2007. Responsiveness in Network Governance: Revisiting a Fundamental Concept. Public Performance and Management Review 31 (2 131 43.
36. Yang, Kaifeng, and Sanjay K. Pandey. 2007. Public Responsiveness of Government Organizations: Testing a Preliminary Model. Public Performance and Management Review 31 (2 215 40.
37. Yin, Robert K. 2003. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage Publications.