Transforming the administrative state: Reform in Hong Kong and the future of the developmental state

Public Administration Review

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 335-346

  Painter, Martin ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 19944413318     PISSN: 00333352     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00458.x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Barzelay, Michael. 2001. The New Public Management: Improving Research and Policy Dialogue. Berkeley: University of California Press.
2. Beeson, Mark. 2003. Japan's Reluctant Reforms and the Legacy of the Developmental State. In Governance and Public Sector Reform in Asia: Paradigm Shifts or Business as Usual? edited by Anthony Cheung and lan Scott, 38-41. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
3. Burns, John. 2002. Civil Service Reform in the HKSAR. In The First Tung Chee-hwa Administration, edited by Lau Siu-kai, 267-88. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
4. Chan, Anson. 2000. Opening Address: A Civil Service for Asia's World City Conference, January 5, Hong Kong.
5. Chan, Chak-kwan. 1998. Welfare Policies and the Construction of Welfare Relations in a Residual Welfare State: The Case of Hong Kong. Social Policy and Administration 32(3): 278-91.
6. Cheung, Anthony. 1996. Public Sector Reform and the Re-Legitimation of Public Bureaucratic Power: The Case of Hong Kong. International Journal of Public Sector Management 9(5/6): 37-50.
7. _. 2000. Between Autonomy and Accountability: Hong Kong's Senior Civil Servants in Search of an Identity. In Ethics in Public Service for the New Millennium, edited by R.A. Chapman, 185-202. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
8. _. 2002. The Changing Political System: Executive-Led Government or "Disabled" Governance? In The First Tung Chee-hwa Administration, edited by Lau Siu-kai, 41-68. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
9. Cheung, Anthony, and Ian Scott. 2003. Governance and Public Sector Reforms in Asia: Paradigms, Paradoxes and Dilemmas. In Governance and Public Sector Reform in Asia: Paradigm Shifts or Business as Usual? edited by Anthony Cheung and lan Scott, 1-18. London: RoutledgeCurzon.
10. Christensen, Tom, and Per Laegreid. 2001. A Transformative Perspective on Administrative Reforms. In New Public Management: The Transformation of Ideas and Practice, edited by Tom Christensen and Per Laegreid, 13-39. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
11. Common, Richard. 2001. Public Management and Policy Transfer in Southeast Asia. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
12. Durant, Robert F. 1999. Whither the Neo-Administrative State? Toward a Polity-Centered Theory of Administrative Reform. Journal of Public Administration Theory and Research 10(1): 79-109.
13. Evans, Peter. 1999. Transferable Lessons? Re-Examining the Institutional Prerequisites of East Asian Economic Policies. In East Asian Development: New Perspectives, edited by Yilmaz Akyuz, 66-86. London: Frank Cass.
14. Harris, Peter. 1988. Hong Kong: A Study in Bureaucracy and Politics. Hong Kong: Macmillan.
15. Hayllar, Mark. 2005. Outsourcing: Enhancing Private Sector Involvement in Public Services Provision in Hong Kong. In Public Service Reform in East Asia: Reform Issues and Challenges in Japan, Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong, edited by Anthony B.L. Cheung, 193-229. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
16. Holliday, Ian. 2000. Productivist Welfare Capitalism: Social Policy in East Asia. Political Studies 48(4): 706-23.
17. Holliday, Ian, and Linda Wong. 2003. Social Policy under One Country, Two Systems: Institutional Dynamics in China and Hong Kong since 1997. Public Administration Review 63(3): 269-82.
18. Hong Kong. Civil Service Bureau. 1999. Civil Service Reform: Civil Service into the 21st Century. Hong Kong: Civil Service Bureau, Government Secretariat.
19. _. 2002. Management-Initiated Retirement Scheme. Hong Kong: Legislative Council Panel on Public Service.
20. Hong Kong. Special Administration Region (HKSAR). 2002. The Budget 2002-03. Hong Kong: HKSAR.
21. _. 2003. The Budget 2003-04. Hong Kong: HKSAR.
22. Huque, Shafiqul, Mark Hayllar, Anthony Cheung, Norman Flynn, and Hoi-kwok Wong. 1999. Public Sector Reform in Hong Kong: The Performance of Trading Funds. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong, Department of Public and Social Administration.
23. Huque, Shafiqul, Grace Lee, and Anthony Cheung. 1998. The Civil Service in Hong Kong: Continuity and Change. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
24. Huque, Ahmed Shafiqul, and Ray Yep. 2003. Globalization and Reunification: Administrative Reforms and the China-Hong Kong Convergence Challenge. Public Administration Review 63(2): 141-52.
25. Johnson, Chalmers. 1982. MITI and the Japanese Miracle: The Growth of Industry Policy 1925-1975. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26. Knill, Christoph. 1999. Explaining Cross-National Variance in Administrative Reform: Autonomous versus Instrumental Bureaucracies. Journal of Public Policy 19(2): 113-39.
27. Lau, Siu-kai. 2002. Tung Chee-hwa's Governing Strategy: The Shortfall in Politics. In The First Tung Chee-hwa Administration, edited by Lau Siu-kai, 1-40. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
28. Lee, Grace. 2003. Hong Kong - Institutional Inheritance from Colony to Special Administrative Region. In Rewards for High Public Office: Asian and Pacific-Rim Countries, edited by Christopher Hood, B. Guy Peters, and Grace Lee, 130-44. London: Routledge.
29. Lee, Jane. 2001. The Changing Context of Public Sector Reform and Its Implications in Hong Kong. In Public Sector Reform in Hong Kong, edited by Anthony Cheung and Jane Lee, 55-80. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
30. Ma, Ngok. 2002. Executive-Legislative Relations: Assessing Legislative Influence in an Executive-Dominant System. In The First Tung Chee-hwa Administration: The First Five Years of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, edited by Lau Siu-kai, 349-74. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
31. Manning, Nick, Nazneed Barma, Jean Blondel, Elsa Pilichowski, and Vincent Wright. 1999. Strategic Decision-Making in Cabinet Government: Institutional Underpinnings and Obstacles. Washington, DC: World Bank.
32. Marx, Fritz Morstein. 1957. The Administrative State: An Introduction to Bureaucracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Painter, Martin. 2005. Bureaucratic Autonomy and Administrative Reform Capacity in East and Southeast Asia. In Public Service Reform in East Asia: Reform Issues and Challenges in Japan, Korea, Singapore and Hong Kong, edited by Anthony B.L. Cheung, 194-231. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
34. Peters, B. Guy. 1996. The Future of Governing: Four Emerging Models. Kansas: University of Kansas Press.
35. Sankey, Colin. 1995. Public Sector Reform: Past Developments and Recent Trends. In Public Sector Reform in Hong Kong, edited by Anthony Cheung, 15-38. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
36. _. 2001. An Overview of Public Sector Reform Initiatives in the Hong Kong Government since 1989. In Public Sector Reform in Hong Kong: Into the 21st Century, edited by Anthony Cheung and Jane Lee, 3-28. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
37. Scott, Ian. 1989a. Political Change and the Crisis of Legitimacy in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
38. _. 1989b. Administration in a Small Capitalist State: The Hong Kong Experience. Public Administration and Development 9(2): 185-99.
39. _. 2000. The Disarticulation of Hong Kong's Post-Handover Political System. China Journal 43: 29-53.
40. Task Force on Review of Civil Service Pay Policy and System. 2002. Phase One Final Report. Hong Kong: Civil Service Bureau.
41. Vickers, Simon. 2001. "More Colonial Again"? The Post-1997 Culture of Hong Kong's Governing Elite. International Journal of Public Administration 24(9): 951-75.
42. Waldo, Dwight. 1948. The Administrative State: A Study of the Political Theory of American Public Administration. New York: Ronald Press.