Concurrent performance of military and robotics tasks and effects of cueing in a simulated multi-tasking environment

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 1-15

  Chen, Jessie Y C ^a  

^a U S ARMY RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 59349097656     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: 15313263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/pres.18.1.1     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Chen, J. Y. C., Durlach, P. J., Sloan, J. A., & Bowens, L. D. (2008). Human-robot interaction in the context of simulated route reconnaissance missions. Military Psychology, 20(3), 135-149.
2. Chen, J. Y. C., Haas, E. C., & Barnes, M. J. (2007). Human performance issues and user interface design for teleoperated robots. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics- Part C: Applications and Reviews, 37(6), 1231-1245.
3. Derryberry, D., & Reed, M. (2002). Anxiety-related attentional biases and their regulation by attentional control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 225-236.
4. Dixon, S., Wickens, C., & Chang, D. (2003). Comparing quantitative model predictions to experimental data in multiple-UAV flight control. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting, 104-108.
5. Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H., & Derman, D. (1976). Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests (Rev. ed.). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
6. Gugerty, L., & Brooks, J. (2004). Reference-frame misalignment and cardinal direction judgments: Group differences and strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10(2), 75-88.
7. Hart, S., & Staveland, L. (1988). Development of NASA TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139-183). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
8. Hill, S., Stachowiak, C., & Tauson, R. (2004). Soldier performance in the enclosed compartment of a moving vehicle. Proceedings of NATO Applied Vehicle Technology Panel Symposium, RTO-MP-AVT-110.
9. Horrey, W., & Wickens, C. (2004). Focal and ambient visual contributions and driver visual scanning in lane keeping and hazard detection. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Annual Meeting, 2325-2329.
10. Kaplan, L. M., & Nasrabadi, N. M. (2006). Wiener-based image registration for moving target indication. Proceedings of the 25th Army Science Conference.
11. Kennedy, R., Lane, N., Berbaum, K., & Lilienthal, M. (1993). Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 203-220.
12. Kozhevnikov, M., Hegarty, M., & Mayer, R. E. (2002). Revising the visualizer-verbalizer dimension: Evidence for two types of visualizers. Cognition & Instruction, 20(1), 47-77.
13. Krausman, A. S., Elliott, L. R., & Pettitt, R. A. (2005). Effects of visual, auditory, and tactile alerts on platoon leader performance and decision making. Tech. Rep. ARL-TR-3633. Adelphi, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
14. Luck, J., Allender, L., & Russell, D. (2006). An investigation of real world control of robotic assets under communication latency. Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Human-Robot Interaction.
15. Mitchell, D. (2005). Soldier workload analysis of the mounted combat system (MCS) platoon's use of unmanned assets. Tech. Rep. ARL-TR-3476. Adelphi, MD: U.S. Army Research Laboratory.
16. Murray, S. (1994). Human performance studies for control of multiple remote systems. Tech. Rep. NRaD 1658. San Diego, CA: SPAWAR.
17. Neumann, J. (2006). Effect of operator control configuration on unmanned aerial system trainability. Doctoral dissertation, University of Central Florida.
18. Parasuraman, R., Molloy, R., & Singh, I. (1993). Performance consequences of automation-induced "complacency." International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 3, 1-23.
19. Rantanen, E., & Goldberg, J. (1999). The effect of mental workload on the visual field size and shape. Ergonomics, 42, 816-834.
20. Richard, C., Wright, R., Ee, C., Prime, S., Shimizu, Y., & Vavrik, J. (2002). Effect of a concurrent auditory task on visual search performance in a driving-related image-flicker task. Human Factors, 44, 108-119.
21. Scanlan, L. (1977). Target acquisition in realistic terrain. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, 249-253.
22. Schumacher, E., Seymour, T., Glass, J., Fencsik, D., Lauber, E., Kieras, D., et al. (2001). Virtually perfect time sharing in dual-task performance: Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck. Psychological Science, 12(2), 101-108.
23. Schipani, S. (2003). An evaluation of operator workload during partially-autonomous vehicle operations. Proceedings of PerMIS 2003.
24. Terrence, P. I., Brill, J. C., & Gilson, R. D. (2005). Body orientation and the perception of spatial auditory and tactile cues. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting, 1663-1667.
25. Thomas, L., & Wickens, C. (2004). Eye-tracking and individual differences in off-normal event detection when flying with a synthetic vision system display. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 48th Meeting, 223-227.
26. Thomas, L., & Wickens, C. (2000). Effects of display frame of reference on spatial judgments and change detection. Tech. Rep. ARL-00-14. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Institute of Aviation.
27. TRADOC. (2003). The United States Army objective force operational and organizational plan maneuver unit of action. TRADOC Pamphlet 525-3-90 O&O. Fort Knox, KY: Unit of Action Maneuver Battle Lab.
28. Wickens, C., Dixon, S., & Chang, D. (2003). Using interference models to predict performance in a multiple-task UAV environment-2 UAVs. Tech. Rep. AHFD-03-9/MAD-03-1. Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois, Institute of Aviation.