Sensitivity to injustice;Sensibilität für Ungerechtigkeit

Psychologische Rundschau

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 8-22

  Schmitt, Manfred ^a   Baumert, Anna ^a   Fetchenhauer, Detlef ^a   Gollwitzer, Mario ^a   Rothmund, Tobias ^a   Schlösser, Thomas ^a  

^a Rheinland Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern Landau   (Germany)

Author keywords

Activation of justice concepts; Antisocial behavior; Civil courage; Elaboration of justice concepts; Experimental games; Information processing; Prosocial behavior; Selfish behavior

Indexed keywords

EID: 59349097275     PISSN: 00333042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1026/0033-3042.60.1.8     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
2. Anderson, J. R. (2004). Cognitive Psychology and its Implications. New York: Freeman.
3. Aquino, K. & Reed, A. II. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 83, 1423-1440.
4. Austin, W. & Walster, E. (1975). Equity with the world: The transrelational effects of equity and inequity. Sociometry, 38, 474-496.
5. Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M., Schmitt, M., Staubach, M., Otto, K. & Bobocel, R. (unter Begutachtung). Justice sensitivity and the processing of justice-related information.
6. Baumert, A., Gschwendner-Lukas, T. & Schmitt, M. (in Vorbereitung). Justice sensitivity shapes automatic and controlled integration of allocation information.
7. Baumert, A., Halmburger, A., Hauer, J., Krettek, C. & Schmitt, M. (in Vorbereitung). Justice sensitivity and civil courage.
8. Baumert, A. & Schmitt, M. (in Druck). Justice sensitive interpretations of ambiguous situations. Australian Journal of Psychology.
9. Bierhoff, H.-W. (1992). Prozedurale Gerechtigkeit: Das Wie und Warum der Fairness. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 23, 163-178.
10. Bierhoff, H.-W. (2000). Skala der sozialen Verantwortung nach Berkowitz und Daniels: Entwicklung und Validierung. Diagnostica, 46, 18-28.
11. Bies, R. J. & Tripp, T. M. (2001). A passion for justice: The rationality and morality of revenge. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice (Vol. 2; pp. 197-208). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Boll, T. (1998). Intentionalitätstheoretische Forschungsstrategie für moralische Emotionen. In B. Reichle & M. Schmitt (Hrsg.), Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit und Moral (S. 173-187). Weinheim: Juventa.
13. Borkenau, P. & Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren Inventar. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
14. Chi, M. T. H., Feltovich, P. J. & Glaser, R. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121-125.
15. Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Judge, T. A. & Shaw, J. C. (2006). Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 110-127.
16. Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (Eds.), The Adapted Mind (pp. 163-228). New York: Oxford University Press.
17. Cropanzano, R. (Ed.). (2001). Justice in the Workplace: From Theory to Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Crosby, F. (1982). Relative Deprivation and Working Women. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Dalbert, C. (2001). The Justice Motive as a Personal Resource. New York: Kluwer.
20. Dalbert, C., Montada, L. & Schmitt, M. (1987). Glaube an eine gerechte Welt als Motiv: Validierungskorrelate zweier Skalen. Psychologische Beiträge, 29, 596-615.
21. Dar, Y. & Resh, N. (2001). Exploring the multifaceted structure of sense of deprivation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 63-81.
22. Davey, L. M., Bobocel, D. R., Hing, L. S. S. & Zanna, M. P. (1999). Preference for the Merit Principle Scale: An individual difference measure of distributive justice preferences. Social Justice Research, 12, 223-240.
23. Dawes, R. (1980). Social dilemmas. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 169-193.
24. Deutsch, M. (1958). Trust and suspicion. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 265-279.
25. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive Justice: A Social Psychological Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26. Devine, P. G. (1989). Steorotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(1), 5-18.
27. Erdley, C. A. & D'Agostino, P. R. (1988). Cognitive and affective components of automatic priming effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 741-747.
28. Fetchenhauer, D. & Huang, X. (2004). Justice Sensitivity and distributive decisions in experimental games. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1015-1029.
29. Folger, R. & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
30. Goldmann, B. (2003). The application of referent cognition theory to legal-claiming by terminated workers: The role of organizational justice and anger. Journal of Management, 29, 705-728.
31. Gollwitzer, M. (2005). Ist "gerächt" gleich "gerecht"? Eine Analyse von Racheaktionen und rachebezogenen Reaktionen unter gerechtigkeitspsychologischen Aspekten. Berlin: wvb.
32. Gollwitzer, M. (2007). How affective is revenge? Emotional processes involved in vengeful reactions to experienced injustice. In G. Steffgen & M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), Emotions and Aggressive Behavior (pp. 115-129). Toronto: Hogrefe & Huber.
33. Gollwitzer, M. & Rothmund, T. (in Druck). When the need to trust results in unethical behavior: The Sensitivity to Mean Intentions (SeMI) model. In D. De Cremer (Ed.), Psychological Perspectives on Unethical Behavior and Decision Making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
34. Gollwitzer, M., Rothmund, T., Pfeiffer, A. & Ensenbach, C. (unter Begutachtung). Why and when Justice Sensitivity leads to pro- and antisocial behavior.
35. Gollwitzer, M., Schmitt, M., Schalke, R., Maes, J. & Baer, A. (2005). Asymmetrical effects of justice sensitivity perspectives on prosocial and antisocial behavior. Social Justice Research, 18, 183-201.
36. Greenberg, J. & Colquitt, J. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of Organizational Justice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Greitemeyer, T., Fischer, P., Kastenmüller, A. & Frey, D. (2006). Civil courage and helping behaviour: Differences and similarities. European Psychologist, 11, 90-98.
38. Hafer, C. L. & Bègue, L. (2005). Experimental research on justworld theory: Problems, development, and future challenges. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 128-167.
39. Higgins, E. T. & King, G. (1981). Accessibility of social constructs: Information-processing consequences of individual and contextual variability. In N. Cantor & J. F. Kihlstrom (Eds.), Personality, Cognition, and Social Interaction (pp. 69-122). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S. & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141-154.
41. Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D. & Miles, E. W. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12, 222-234.
42. Komorita, S. S. & Parks, C. D. (1994). Social dilemmas. Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
43. Lerner, M. J. (1977). The justice motive in social behavior. Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. Journal of Personality, 45, 1-52.
44. Lerner, M. J. (1980), The Belief in a Just World. A Fundamental Delusion. New York: Plenum.
45. Lerner, M. J. & Mikula, G. (Eds.). (1994). Entitlement and the Affectional Bond: Justice in Close Relationships. New York: Academic Press.
46. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationships. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social Exchange (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum.
47. Liebig, S. & Lengfeld, H. (2002). Interdisziplinäre Gerechtigkeitsforschung. Zur Verknüpfung empirischer und normativer Perspektiven. Frankfurt: Campus.
48. Lind, A. E. & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.
49. Lipkus, I. (1991). The construction and preliminary validation of a global belief in a just world scale and the exploratory analysis of the multidimensional belief in a just world scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 1171-1178.
50. Lovas, L. & Wolt, R. (2002). Sensitivity to injustice in the context of some personality traits. Studia Psychologica, 44, 125-131.
51. MacLeod, C., Mathews, A. & Tata, P. (1986). Attentional bias in emotional disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 95, 15-20.
52. MacLeod, C., Rutherford, E., Campbell, L., Ebsworthy, G. & Holker, L. (2002). Selective attention and emotional vulnerability: assessing the causal basis of their association through the experimental manipulation of attentional bias. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 111, 107-123.
53. Maes, J. (1998). Eight Stages in the Development of Research on the Construct of Belief in a Just World. In L. Montada & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Responses to Victimizations and Belief in a Just World (pp. 163-186). New York: Plenum.
54. Major, B. & Deaux, K. (1982). Individual differences injustice behavior. In J. Greenberg & R. L. Cohen (Eds.), Equity and Justice in Social Behavior (pp. 43-76). New York: Academic Press.
55. Mikula, G. (1980). Gerechtigkeit und soziale Interaktion. Bern: Huber.
56. Mikula, G., Scherer, K. R. & Athenstaedt, U. (1998). The role of injustice in the elicitation of differential emotional reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 769-783.
57. Mikula, G., Petri, B. & Tanzer, N. (1990). What people regard as unjust: Types and structures of everyday experiences of injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 133-149.
58. Miller, D. T. (2001). Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 527-553.
59. Mohiyeddini, C. (1998). Sensibilität für widerfahrene Ungerechtigkeit als Persönlichkeitseigenschaft. In B. Reichle & M. Schmitt (Hrsg.), Verantwortung, Gerechtigkeit und Moral (S. 201-212). Weinheim: Juventa.
60. Mohiyeddini, C. & Schmitt, M. (1997). Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to unfair treatment in a laboratory situation. Social Justice Research, 10, 333-353.
61. Montada, L. (2003). Justice, equity, and fairness in human relations. In J. Weiner (Ed.), Handbook of Psychology, Vol. 5 (pp. 537-568). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
62. Montada, L., Dalbert, C., Reichle, B. & Schmitt, M. (1985). Urteile über Gerechtigkeit, "existentielle Schuld" und Strategien der Schuldabwehr. In F. Oser, W. Althof & D. Garz (Hrsg.), Moralische Zugänge zum Menschen - Zugänge zum moralischen Menschen (S. 205-225). München: Kindt.
63. Montada, L. & Kals, E. (2007). Mediation. Weinheim: Beltz.
64. Montada, L. & Lerner, M. J. (1998). Responses to Victimization and Belief in a Just World. New York: Plenum Press.
65. Montada, L. & Schneider, A. (1989). Justice and emotional reactions to the disadvantaged. Social Justice Research, 3, 313-344.
66. Montada, L., Schneider, A. & Reichle, B. (1988). Emotionen und Hilfsbereitschaft. In H.-W. Bierhoff & L. Montada (Hrsg.), Altruismus - Bedingungen der Hilfsbereitschaft (S. 130-153). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
67. Montada, L., Schmitt, M. & Dalbert, C. (1986). Thinking about justice and dealing with one's own privileges: A study of existential guilt. In H.-W. Bierhoff, R. L. Cohen & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in Social Relations (pp. 125-143). New York: Plenum Press.
68. Müller, A. W. (1998). Was taugt die Tugend? Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.
69. Ostendorf, F. & Angleitner, A. (2004). NEO-PI-R. NEO Persönlichkeitsinventar, revidierte Form. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
70. Rime, B., Philippot, P., Boca, S. & Mesquita, B. (1992). Long-lasting cognitive and social consequences of emotion: Social sharing and rumination. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 3., pp. 225-258). Chichester: Wiley.
71. Rubin, Z. & Peplau, L. A. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31 (3), 65-89.
72. Sabbagh, C. (2001). A taxonomy of normative and empirically oriented theories of distributive justice. Social Justice Research, 14, 37-263.
73. Sabbagh, C., Dar, Y. & Resh, N. (1994). The structure of social justice judgments: A facet approach. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 244-261.
74. Schlösser, T. & Fetchenhauer, D. (in Vorbereitung). A matter of character? Personality dispositions and behavior in experimental games.
75. Schmitt, M. (1994). Gerechtigkeit. In M. Hockel, W. Molt & L. von Rosenstiel (Hrsg.), Handbuch der Angewandten Psychologie (Kapitel VII. 10). München: ecomed.
76. Schmitt, M., Baumert, A., Gollwitzer, M. & Maes, J. (unter Begutachtung). The Justice Sensitivity Inventory: Factorial validity, location in the personality facet space, demographic pattern, and normative data.
77. Schmitt, M., Behner, R., Montada, L., Müller, L. & Müller-Fohrbrodt, G. (2000). Gender, ethnicity, and education as privileges: Exploring the generalizability of the existential guilt reaction. Social Justice Research, 13, 313-337.
78. Schmitt, M. & Dörfel, M. (1999). Procedural injustice at work, justice sensitivity, job satisfaction and psychosomatic wellbeing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 443-453.
79. Schmitt, M., Gollwitzer, M., Maes, J. & Arbach, D. (2005). Justice sensitivity: Assessment and location in the personality space. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 202-211.
80. Schmitt, M. & Mohiyeddini, C. (1996). Sensitivity to befallen injustice and reactions to a real life disadvantage. Social Justice Research, 9, 223-238.
81. Schmitt, M., Neumann, R. & Montada, L. ( 1995). Dispositional sensitivity to befallen injustice. Social Justice Research, 8, 385-407.
82. Schmitt, M., Rebele, J., Bennecke, J. & Förster, N. (2008). Ungerechtigkeitssensibilität, Kündigungsgerechtigkeit und Verantwortlichkeitszuschreibungen als Korrelate von Einstellungen und Verhalten Gekündigter gegenüber ihrem früheren Arbeitgeber (Post Citizenship Behavior). Wirtschaftspsvchologie, 10, 101-110.
83. Schneider, W. & Bjorklund, D. F. (1992). Expertise, aptitude, and strategic remembering. Child Development, 63, 461-473.
84. Schwinger, T. & Winterhoff-Spurk, P. (1984). Gleichheits- vs. Leistungsprinzip: Rasch-Skalen zur Messung dispositioneller Einstellungen zu zwei Prinzipien distributiver Gerechtigkeit. Diagnostica, 30, 125-143.
85. Skarlicki, D. P., Folger, R. & Tesluk, P. (1999). Personality as a moderator in the relationship between fairness and retaliation. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 100-108.
86. Srull, T. K. & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1979). The role of category accessibility in the interpretation of information about persons: Some determinants and implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1660-1672.
87. Stouffer, S. A., Suchman, E. A., DeVinney, L. C., Star, S. A. & Williams, R. M. (1949). The American Soldier: Adjustment During Army Life (Vol. 1). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
88. Thibaut, J. W. & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
89. Tobey-Klass, E. (1978). Psychological effects of immoral actions: The experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 757-771.
90. Törestad, B. (1990). What is anger provoking? A psychophysical study of perceived causes of anger. Aggressive Behavior, 16, 9-26.
91. Van Hiel, A., De Cremer, D. & Stouten, J. (in Druck). The personality basis of justice: The five-factor model as an integrative model of personality and procedural fairness effects on cooperation. European Journal of Personality.
92. Vidmar, N. (2002). Retributive justice: Its social context. In M. Ross & D. T. Miller (Eds.), The justice motive in everyday life (pp. 291-313). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
93. Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F. & Chin, J. (2007). Feeling duped: Emotional, motivational, and cognitive aspects of being exploited by others. Review of General Psychology, 11, 127-141.
94. Walker, I. & Smith, H. (Ed.). (2002). Relative Deprivation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
95. Walster, E., Walster, G. W. & Berscheid, E. (1978). Equity: Theory and Research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.