Managing universal accessibility requirements in software-intensive projects

Software Process Improvement and Practice

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 3-29

  Akoumianakis, Demosthenes ^a  

^a TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CRETE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Nonfunctional requirements; Scenario based approach; Software design; Universal accessibility

Indexed keywords

PROJECT MANAGEMENT; USER INTERFACES;

ACCESSIBILITY REQUIREMENTS; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT; NON-FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS; PLATFORM INTEGRATIONS; PROJECT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; SCENARIO-BASED; UNIVERSAL ACCESSIBILITY; USER INTERFACE PROTOTYPING;

SOFTWARE DESIGN;

EID: 59349091315     PISSN: 10774866     EISSN: 10991670     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/spip.383     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Abrams M, Phanouriou C, Batongbacal A, Williams S, Shuster J. 1999. UIML: an appliance-independent XML user interface language. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, May 1999, ISBN 0444502645 Proceedings of the 8th WWW Conference, http://www.harmonia.com/resources/papers/www8.0599/index.htm.
2. Akoumianakis D, Stephanidis C. 2003. Blending scenarios of use and informal argumentation to facilitate universal access: experience with the Universal Access Assessment Workshop method. Behaviour & Information Technology 22(4): 227-244.
3. Akoumianakis D, Pachoulakis I. 2005. In Scenario Networks: Specifying user Interfaces with Extended use Cases,
4. LNCS 3746, Bozanis P, Houstis EN (eds). Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 491-501.
5. Akoumianakis D, Katsis A, Vidakis N. 2006. Non-functional User Interface Requirements notation (NfRn) for modeling the global execution context of tasks. Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on Task models and diagrams (TAMODIA '06), Hasselt, October 23-24.
6. Akoumianakis D, Vidakis N, Vellis G, Kotsalis D, Milolidakis G. 2007. Experience-based social and collaborative performance in an 'electronic village' of local interest: The eKoNEE framework. Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (ICEIS'2007), Madeira, 12-16 June.
7. Alvarez-Cavazos F, Garcia-Sanchez R, Garza-Salazar D, Lavariega J, Gomez L, Sordia M. 2005. Universal access architecture for digital libraries. Toronto, Ontario, Canada, October 2005, ISSN: 1705-7361 Proceedings of the 2005 conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative research CASCON '05, IBM Centre for Advanced Studies, 12-28.
8. Anton A, Potts C. 1998. A representational framework for scenarios of system use. Requirements Engineering 3: 219-241.
9. Barbacci M, Klein M, Longstaff T, Weinstocket C. 1995. Quality Attributes, (CMU/SEI-95-TR-021). Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University: Pittsburgh, PA, Available from http://www.sei.cmu.edu/ publications/documents/95.reports/95.tr.021.html.
10. Barbacci M, Ellison R, Lattanze A, Stafford J, Weinstock C, Wood W. 2002. Quality Attribute Workshops, CMU/SEI-2002-TR-019, 2nd edn. Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute: Pittsburgh, PA, (http://www.sei.cmu.edu/ pub/documents/02.reports/pdf/02tr019.pdf).
11. Bass L, Clements P, Kazman R. 1998. Software architecture in practice. SEI Series in Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.
12. Bevan N. 1995. Measuring usability as quality of use. Software Quality Journal 4: 115-130.
13. Breitman K-K, Leite J, Berry DM. 2005. Supporting scenario evolution. Requirements Engineering 10:112-131.
14. Calvary G, Coutaz J, Thevenin D. 2001. A unifying reference framework for the development of plastic user interfaces. Proceedings of EHCI 2001, Toronto, 218-238.
15. Carmien S, Dawe M, Fischer G, Gorman A, Kintsch A, Sullivan Jr., JF. 2005. Socio-Technical Environments Supporting People with Cognitive Disabilities Using Public Transportation, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12(2): pp. 233-262.
16. Carroll JM, Campbell RL. 1989. Artefacts as psychological theories: the case of human computer interaction. Behaviour & Information Technology 8:247-256.
17. Carroll J, Rosson M. 1992. Getting around the task-artifact cycle: how to make claims and design by scenario. ACM Transactions of Information Systems 10:181-212.
18. Chorianopoulos K, Spinellis D. 2004. Affective usability evaluation for an interactive music television channel. Computers in Entertainment 2(3): 1-11.
19. Chung L, Nixon B, Yu E, Mylopoulos J. 1999. Non-functional Requirements in Software Engineering. Kluwer Academic Publishers: Boston, MA.
20. Crease M, Gray P, Brewster S. 2000. A toolkit of mechanism and context independent widgets. DSV-IS 2000,7th International Workshop on Design, Specification and Verification of Interactive Systems Limerick, Ireland, June 5-6, 2000 Proceedings of DSVIS.00, 127-141.
21. Erskine L, Carter-Tod D, Burton J. 1997. Dialogical techniques for the design of web sites. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 47:169-195.
22. Grasso F, Awsey A, Jones R. 2000. Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: a case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 53(6): 1077-1115.
23. Hudlicka E. 2003. To feel or not to feel: The role of affect in human-computer interaction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59: 71-75.
24. Hull L. 2004. Accessibility: it is not just for disabilities any more. Interactions: 11(2): March/April 2004, pp. 36-41.
25. Jacobson I, Booch G, Rumbaugh J. 1999. The Unified Software Development Process. Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA.
26. Jacobson I, Christeron M, Jonsson P, Overgaard G. 1992. Object-oriented Software Engineering - A Use Case Driven Approach. Addison-Wesley Reading, MA.
27. Kaindl H. 2000. A design process based on a model combining scenarios with goals and functions. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part A-Systems and Humans 30(5): 537-551.
28. LaPlant B, Trewin S, Zimmermann G, Vanderheiden G. 2004. The universal remote console: a universal access bus for pervasive computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing 3(1): 76-80.
29. Lassing N, Bengtsson P, van Vliet H, Bosch J. 2002. Experiences with ALMA: architecture-level modifiability analysis. Journal of Systems and Software 61:47-57.
30. Landuaer TK. 1995. The Trouble with Computers: usefulness, Usability and Productivity, Cambridge, MIT Press.
31. Lee C, Helal S, Lee W. 2006. Universal Interactions with Smart Spaces. IEEE Pervasive Computing: 5(1): 16-21.
32. Leite JCSP, Doom JH, Hadad GDS, Kaplan GN. 2005. Scenario inspections. Requirements Engineering 10: 1-21.
33. Liu L, Yu E. 2003. Designing information systems in social context: a goal and scenario modeling approach. Information Systems 29(2): 187-203.
34. MacLean A, Young R, Bellotti V, Moran T. 1991. Questions, options, and criteria: elements of design space analysis. Human-Computer Interaction 6(3&4): 201-250.
35. Maiden N. 1998. CREWS-SAVRE: scenarios for acquiring and validating requirements. Automated Software Engineering 5(4): 419-446.
36. Mayhew DJ. 1999. The Usability Engineering Lifecycle: A Practitioner's Handbook for User Interface design. Morgan Kaufmann: San Francisco, CA.
37. Moll-Carrillo HJ, Salomon G, March M, Fulton Suri J, and Spreenber P. 1995. Articulating a Metaphor through user-centred design, Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (ACM CHI'95), Denver, USA, 566-572.
38. Mori G, Paternò F, Santoro C. 2004. Design and Development of Multidevice user interfaces through multiple logical descriptions. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 30(8): 1-14.
39. Myers B. 1988. Creating User Interfaces by Demonstration. Academic Press: Boston, MA.
40. Mylopoulos J, Chung L, Nixon B. 1992. Representing and using Non-Functional requirements: a process-oriented approach. Software Engineering 18(6): 483-497.
41. Nicolle C, Abascal J (eds). 2001. Inclusive Design Guidelines for HCI. Taylor & Francis: London, (ISBN 0-7484-0948-3).
42. Nielsen J. 1993. Usability Engineering. Academic Press: London.
43. Norman DA. 2002. Emotion and design: Attractive things work better. Interactions Magazine 9(4): 36-42.
44. Olsen D. 1999. Interacting in Chaos. Interactions: 6(5): 42-54, Sept.-Oct., 1999.
45. Perry M, Sanderson D. 1998. Coordinating joint design work: the role of communication and artifacts. Design Studies 19: 273-288.
46. Perry M, O'hara K, Sellen A, Brown B, Harper R. 2001. Dealing with mobility: understanding access anytime, anywhere. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 8(4): 323-347.
47. Preece J, Rogers Y, Sharp H. 2002. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. John Wiley and Sons: New York.
48. Regnell B, Kimbler K, Wesslén A. 1995. Improving the Use Case Driven Approach to Requirements Engineering, Second IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering. IEEE Computer Society Press: Los Alamitos, CA.
49. Savidis A, Stephanidis C, Akoumianakis D. 1997. Unifying toolkit programming layers: a multi-purpose toolkit integration module. In Proceedings of the 4th Eurographics Workshop on Design, Specification, and Verification of Interactive Systems (DSV-IS'97), Granada, Harrison MD, Torres JC (eds). Springer: Berlin, New York, 177-192.
50. Savidis A, Akoumianakis D, Stephanidis C. 2001. The unified user interface design method. In User Interfaces for All - Concepts, Methods, and Tools, Stephanidis C (ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Mahwah, NJ, 417-440, (ISBN 0-8058-2967-9).
51. Seffah A, Donyaee M, Kline R, Padda H. 2006. Usability measurement and metrics: a consolidated model. Software Quality Journal 14:159-178.
52. Shneiderman B. 2000. Universal Usability: pushing human computer interaction research to empower every citizen. Communications of the ACM 43: 84-91.
53. Stephanidis C, Savidis A, Akoumianakis D. 1997. Tutorial on 'Unified interface development: tools for constructing accessible and usable user interfaces'. Tutorial Notes 13, 7th International Conference on Human - Computer Interaction (HCI International '97), San Francisco, USA, 24-29 August, available at http://www.ics.forth.gr/hci/html/tutorials.html.
54. Stephanidis C, Akoumianakis D, & Paramythis A. 1999. Tutorial on "Coping with Diversity in HCI: Techniques for Adaptable and Adaptive Interaction". Tutorial Notes 11, 8th International Conference on Human - Computer Interaction (HCI International '99), Munich, Germany, 22-26 August, available at http://www.ics.forth.gr/hci/html/tutorials.html.
55. Stephanidis C, Savidis A, Akoumianakis D. 2001. Tutorial on 'Universally accessible UIs: the unified user interface development.' Tutorial in the 2001 ACM SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI 2001), Seattle, WA, 31 March-5 April 2001, available at http://www.ics.forth.gr/hci/files/CHI. Tutorial.pdf).
56. Story MF. 1998. Maximising usability: the principles of universal design. Assistive Technology 10:4-12.
57. Subramanian N, Chung L. 2001. Metrics for Software Adaptability, Proceedings of Software Quality Management Conference (SQM 2001), April 18-20, Loughborough, UK, available at http://www.utdallas.edu/~chung/ftp/sqm.pdf.
58. Thevenin D, Coutaz J. 1999. Plasticity of user interfaces: framework and research Agenda. Proceedings of Interact'99, Vol. 1. IFIP, IOS Press: Edinburgh, 110-117.
59. Ueda H. 2001. The FRIEND21 framework for human interface architectures. In User Interfaces for All - Concepts, Methods, and Tools, Stephanidis C (ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, 245-270.