Nanofiltration of Cleaning-in-Place (CIP) wastewater in a detergent plant: Effects of pH, temperature and transmembrane pressure on flux behavior

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 65, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 117-129

  Kaya, Yasemin ^a   Barlas, Hulusi ^a   Arayici, Semiha ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Flux decline; Nanofiltration; Recovery; Surfactants

Indexed keywords

ANGLE MEASUREMENT; ANIONIC SURFACTANTS; CELL MEMBRANES; CONTACT ANGLE; DETERGENTS; MEMBRANES; NANOFILTRATION; NONIONIC SURFACTANTS; PH; PH EFFECTS; RECOVERY; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER RECLAMATION; WATER RECYCLING;

ATOMIC-FORCE MICROSCOPIES; CONCENTRATION POLARIZATIONS; CONTACT-ANGLE MEASUREMENTS; FLUX DECLINE; MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE; NF MEMBRANES; NON IONICS; PROCESS WATERS; PRODUCT RECOVERIES; SURFACTANTS; TRANS-MEMBRANE PRESSURES;

WATER FILTRATION;

EID: 59149095303     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.10.034     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Goers B., Forstmeier M., Wendler B., and Wozny G. A systematic approach for water network optimisation with membrane processes. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 37 (2003) 217-226
2. Forstmeier M., Goers B., and Wozny G. Product recovery and reduction of wastewater disposal costs in a detergent production facility. Eng. Life Sci. 3 (2003) 181-185
3. Kowalska I., Kabsch-Korbutowicz M., Majewska-Nowak K., and Pietraszek M. Removal of detergents from industrial wastewater in ultrafiltration process. Environ. Prot. Eng. 31 (2005) 207-219
4. Lin S.H., Lin C.M., and Leu H.G. Operating characteristics and kinetic studies of surfactant wastewater treatment by Fenton oxidation. Water Res. 33 7 (1999) 1735-1741
5. Goers B., Mey J., and Wozny G. Optimised product and water recovery from batch-production rinsing waters. Waste Manage. 20 (2006) 651-658
6. Schreiner A., Goers B., Wiesmann U., and Wozny G. Combination of ultrafiltration and biological treatment for product and water recovery. Eng. Life Sci. 2 3 (2002) 86-91
7. Goers B., and Wozny G. Flexible design and operation of a two-step UF/NF system for product recovery from rinsing waters in batch production. Water Sci. Technol. 41 10-11 (2000) 93-100
8. Wendler B., Goers B., and Wozny G. Regeneration of process water containing surfactants by nanofiltration-investigation and modelling of mass transport. Water Sci. Technol. 46 4 (2002) 287-292
9. Kaya Y., Aydiner C., Barlas H., and Keskinler B. Nanofiltration of single and mixture solutions containing anionics and nonionic surfactants below their critical micelle concentrations (CMCs). J. Membr. Sci. 282 (2006) 401-412
10. Boussu K., Vandecasteele C., and Van der Bruggen B. Study of characteristic and the performance of self-made nanoporous polyethersulfone membranes. Polymer 47 (2006) 3464-3476
11. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), D3049-89-Standard Test Method for Synthetic Anionic Ingredient by Cationic Titration, ASTM, Philadelphia, PA, 2003.
12. Cullum D.C. Introduction to Surfactant Analysis. First Edition (1994), Chapman & Hall Publishing, Glasgow
13. Europäische norm, ISO 7887: Water quality examination and determination of color, Brussels, 1994.
14. APHA/AWWA/WEF. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (1995), American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA. 0-87553-223-3
15. Lee Y., and Clark M.M. Modeling of flux decline during crossflow ultrafiltration of colloidal suspensions. J. Membr. Sci. 149 (1998) 181-202
16. Doulia D., and Xiarchos I. Ultrafiltration of micellar solutions of nonionic surfactants with or without alachlor pesticide. J. Membr. Sci. 296 (2007) 58-64
17. DIN 38404, Deutsche einheitsverfahren zur wasser-, abwasser- und schlammuntersuchung- physikalische und physikalisch-chemische kenngröβen (gruppe C)-Teil 3: Bestimmung der absorption im bereich der UV-strahlung-spektraler absorptionskoeffizient (C3), Beuth, Berlin, 2003.
18. Singh S., Khulbe K.C., Matsuura T., and Ramamurthy P. Membrane characterization by solute transport and atomic force microscopy. J. Membr. Sci. 142 (1998) 111-127
19. Rahimpour A., Madaeni S.S., and Mansourpanah Y. The effect of anionic, non-ionic and cationic surfactants on morphology and performance on polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes for milk concentration. J. Membr. Sci. 296 (2007) 110-121
20. Ernst M., Bismarck A., Springer J., and Jekel M. Zeta potential and rejection rates of a polyethersulfone nanofiltration membrane in single salt solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 165 (2000) 251-259
21. Sabaté J., Pujolá M., Labanda L., and Llorens J. Influence of pH and operation variables on biogenic amines nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 58 (2008) 424-428
22. Childress A.E., and Elimelech M. Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34 (2000) 3710-3716
23. Akay G., and Wakeman R.J. Ultrafiltration and microfiltration of surfactant dispersions-an evaluation of published research. Trans. IChemE 71 Part A (1993) 411-420
24. Jönsson A.S., and Jönsson B. The influence of nonionic and anionic surfactants on hydrophobic and hydrophilic ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 56 (1991) 49-76
25. Majewska-Nowak K., Kowalska I., and Kabsch-Korbutowicz M. Ultrafiltration of aqueous solutions containing a mixture of dye and surfactant. Desalination 198 (2006) 149-157
26. Kartal C., and Akbas H. Study on the interaction of anionic dye-nonionic surfactants in a mixture of anionic and nonionic surfactants by adsorption spectroscopy. Dyes Pigments 65 (2005) 191-195
27. Schäfer A.I., Fane A.G., and Waite T.D. Nanofiltration Principles and Applications (2005), Elsevier Ltd., UK. 1-85617-405-0
28. Archer A.C., Mendes A.M., and Boaventura R.A.R. Separation of an anionic surfactant by nanofiltration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33 (1999) 2758-2764
29. Kowalska I. Surfactant removal from water solutions by means of ultrafiltration and ion-exchange. Desalination 221 (2008) 351-357
30. Wang Z., Liu G., Fan Z., Yang X., Wang J., and Wang S. Experimental study on treatment of electroplating wastewater by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 305 (2007) 185-195
31. Kowalska I., Majewska-Nowak K., and Kabsch-Korbutowicz M. Influence of temperature on anionic surface active agent removal from a water solution by ultrafiltration. Desalination 198 (2006) 124-131
32. Kallioinen M., Pekkarinen M., Mänttäri A., Nuortila-Jokinen J., and Nyström M. Comparison of the performance of two different regenerated cellulose ultrafiltration membranes at high filtration pressure. J. Membr. Sci. 294 (2007) 93-102