Influence of temperature on anionic surface active agent removal from a water solution by ultrafiltration

Desalination

Volumn 198, Issue 1-3, 2006, Pages 124-131

  Kowalska, Izabela ^a   Majewska Nowak, Katarzyna ^a   Kabsch Korbutowicz, Malgorzata ^a  

^a WROCLAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Detergent; Polymeric membrane; Surfactant; Temperature; Ultrafiltration

Indexed keywords

ALKYLSULFONATE FAMILY; SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE;

DETERIORATION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY MEASUREMENT; POLYMERIC MEMBRANES; SEPARATION; SOLUTIONS; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; THERMAL EFFECTS; THERMAL EXPANSION; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES;

ULTRAFILTRATION;

DETERIORATION; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY MEASUREMENT; POLYMERIC MEMBRANES; SEPARATION; SOLUTIONS; SURFACE ACTIVE AGENTS; THERMAL EFFECTS; THERMAL EXPANSION; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES; ULTRAFILTRATION;

MEMBRANE; POLYMER; SURFACTANT; TEMPERATURE EFFECT; ULTRAFILTRATION;

EID: 33749645869     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.01.022     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Mulligan C.N., Yong R.N., and Gibbs B.F. Surfactant-enhanced remediation of contaminated soil: a review. Eng. Geol. 60 (2001) 371-380
2. Patel M. Surfactant based on renewable raw materials. Carbon dioxide reduction potential and policies and measures for the European Union. J. Indus. Ecol. 7 (2004) 46-62
3. Przondo J. Srodki powierzchniowo czynne dzis i jutro. Pollena-TSPK 10 (1996) 421-430
4. Dirilgen N., and Ince N. Inhibition effect of the anionic surfactant SDS on duckweed, Lemna minor with considerations of growth and accumulation. Chemosphere 31 9 (1995) 4185-4196
5. Pettersson A., Adamsson M., and Dave G. Toxicity and detoxification of Swedish detergents and softner products. Chemosphere 41 (2000) 1611-1620
6. Wagner S., and Schink B. Anaerobic of nonionic and anionic surfactants in enrichment cultures and fixedbed reactors. Water Res. 21 5 (1987) 615-622
7. Lewis M.A. Chronic and sublethal toxicities of surfactants to aquatic animals: a review and risk assessment. Water Res. 25 1 (1991) 101-113
8. Wolf W., and Feijtel T. Terrestrial risk assessment for linear alkyl benzene sulfonate (LAS) in sludgeamended soils. Chemosphere 36 6 (1998) 1319-1343
9. Goers B., Hintzsche E., Schneider J., and Wozny G. Reduction of water consumption and wastewater in detergent production. Henkel-Referate 34 (1998) 43-49
10. Simonic M., Petrinic I., and Sostar-Turk S. Treatment of the laundary wstewater by using the membrane technology. Tekstilec 47 5-6 (2004) 167-174
11. Archer A.C., Mendes A.M., and Boaventura R.A.R. Separation of an anionic surfactant by nanofiltration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33 (1999) 2758-2764
12. Fernandez E., Cambiella A., Benito J.M., Pazos C., and Coca J. Ultrafiltration of surfactant solutions using ceramic membranes. Proc. Engineering with Membranes, Granada, Spain Vol. 2 (2001) 68-73
13. Majewska-Nowak K., Kabsch-Korbutowicz M., Bryjak M., and Winnicki T. Separation of organic dyes by hydrophilic ultrafiltration membranes. 7th World Filtration Congress, Budapest, Hungary Vol. 2 (1996) 885-889
14. Kowalska I., Kabsch-Korbutowicz M., Majewska-Nowak K., and Bor F.L. An assessment of ultrafiltration membrane materials in sodium dodecyl sulfate removal from water solutions. Environ. Protection Eng. 27 3-4 (2001) 19-25
15. Benito I., Garcia M.A., Monge C., Saz J.M., and Marina M.L. Spectrophotometric and conductometric determination of the ctitical micellar concentration of sodium dodecyl sulfate and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide micellar systems modified by alcohols and salts. Coll. Surf. A: Physicochemical Eng. Aspects 125 (1997) 221-224
16. Volpe P.L.O., and Silva Filho E.A. Calorimetric study of SDS micelle formation in water and in NaCl solution at 298 K. Thermochimica Acta 257 (1995) 59-66
17. Mizoguchi K., Fukui K., Yanagishita H., Nakane T., and Nakata T. Ultrafiltration behavior of a new type of non-ionic surfactant around the CMC. J. Membr. Sci. 208 (2002) 285-288
18. Malyukin V.Yu., Efimova S.L., and Kemnitz K. Spectroscopy of intermolecular interaction in the system: dye-sodium dodecylsulfate micelles. J. Luminiscence 94-95 (2001) 239-242
19. Bruce C.D., Berkowitz M.L., Perera L., and Forbes M.D.E. Molecular dynamics simulation of sodium dodecyl sulfate micelle in water: micellar structural characteristics and counterion distribution. J. Physics Chem. B 106 (2002) 3788-3793
20. Shah S.S., Jamroz N.U., and Sharif Q.M. Micellization parameters and electrostatic interactions in micellar solution of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at different temperatures. Coll. Surf. A: Physicochemical Eng. Aspects 178 (2001) 199-206