Generation of correlated spike trains

Neural Computation

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 188-215

  Brette, Romain ^a  

^a ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; NERVE CELL; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICS; TIME;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); NEURONS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 59149092381     PISSN: 08997667     EISSN: 1530888X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/neco.2009.12-07-657     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bair, W. (1999). Spike timing in the mammalian visual system. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol., 9(4), 447-453.
2. Berman, A., & Shaked-Monderer, N. (2003). Completely positive matrices. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company.
3. Brette, R., Rudolph, M., Carnevale, T., Hines, M., Beeman, D., Bower, J. M., et al. (2007). Simulation of networks of spiking items: A review of tools and strategies. Comput. Neurosci., 23, 349-398.
4. Daley, D. J., & Vere-Jones, D. (2005). An introduction to the theory of point processes. Vol. 1: Elementary theory and methods (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.
5. Destexhe, A., & Pare, D. (1999). Impact of network activity on the integrative properties of neocortical pyramidal neurons in vivo. J. Neurophysiol., 81(4), 1531-1547.
6. Feng, J., & Brown, D. (2000). Impact of correlated inputs on the output of the integrate-and-fire model. Neural. Comput., 22(3), 671-692.
7. Galan, R. F., Fourcaud-Trocme, N., Ermentrout, G. B., & Urban, N. N. (2006). Correlation-induced synchronization of oscillations in olfactory bulb neurons. J. Neurosci., 26(14), 3646-3655.
8. Gutig, R., Aharonov, R., Rotter, S., & Sompolinsky, H. (2003). Learning input correlations through nonlinear temporally asymmetric Hebbian plasticity. J. Neurosci., 23(9), 3697-3714.
9. Konig, P., Engel, A. K., & Singer, W. (1996). Integrator or coincidence detector? The role of the cortical neuron revisited. Trends Neurosci., 19(4), 130-137.
10. Kuhn, A., Aertsen, A., & Rotter, S. (2003). Higher-order statistics of input ensembles and the response of simple model neurons. Neural Comp., 15(1), 67-101.
11. Moreno, R., de la Rocha, J., Renart, A., & Parga, N. (2002). Response of spiking neurons to correlated inputs. Phys. Rev. Lett., 89(28 Pt. 1), 288101.
12. Niebur, E. (2007). Generation of synthetic spike trains with defined pairwise correlations. Neural Comput., 19(7), 1720-1738.
13. Press, W. H., Flannery B. P., Teukolsky, S. A., & Vetterling, W. T. (1993). Numerical recipes in C: Ttie art of scientific computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Roy, S. A., & Alloway K. D. (2001). Coincidence detection or temporal integration? What the neurons in somatosensory cortex are doing. J. Neurosci., 21(7), 2462- 2473.
15. Rudolph, M., & Destexhe, A. (2003). Tuning neocortical pyramidal neurons between integrators and coincidence detectors. J. Comput. Neurosci., 14(3), 239-251.
16. Salinas, E., & Sejnowski, T. (2000). Impact of correlated synaptic input on output firing rate and variability in simple neuronal models. J. Neurosci., 20, 6193-6209.
17. Salinas, E., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2001). Correlated neuronal activity and the flow of neural information. Nat. Rev. Neurosci., 2(8), 539-550.
18. Song, S., & Abbott, L. (2001). Cortical development and remapping through spike timing-dependent plasticity. Neuron, 32, 339-350.
19. Song, S., Miller, K. D., & Abbott, L. F. (2000). Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity. Nature Neurosci., 3(9), 919-926.
20. Usrey, W., AlonsoJ., & Reid, R. (2000). Synaptic interactions between thalamic inputs to simple cells in cat visual cortex. J. Neurosci., 20 (14), 5461-5467.