Spike timing in the mammalian visual system

Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 447-453

  Bair, Wyeth ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; CELL SYNCHRONIZATION; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; LATERAL GENICULATE NUCLEUS; MODEL; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA; REVIEW; SPIKE; TIME; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL NERVOUS SYSTEM;

EID: 0033179133     PISSN: 09594388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-4388(99)80067-1     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. 1. Strong SP, de Ruyter van Steveninck RR, Bialek W, Koberle R: On the application of information theory to neural spike trains. In Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Edited by Altman RB, Dunker AK, Hunter L, Klein TE. Singapore: World Scientific; 1998:621-632.
2. 2. Segev I, Rall W: Excitable dendrites and spines: earlier theoretical insights elucidate recent direct observations. Trends Neurosci 1998, 21:453-460.
3. 3. Brivanlou IH, Warland DK, Meister M: Mechanisms of concerted firing among retinal ganglion cells. Neuron 1998, 20:527-539. The authors describe three circuits, deduced from correlated spike timing and pharmacological manipulations, that underlie the multiple time scales of correlation in the salamander retina. The similarity between these results and those for the cat, summarized in [6], are striking.
4. 4. DeVries SH: Correlated firing in rabbit retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol 1999, 81:908-920. Spike synchrony was found in 5 of 11 classes of retinal ganglion cells. Two mechanism were implicated: the divergence of a presynaptic spike and reciprocal excitation. The latter led to the discovery of an extended receptive field for one class of ganglion cell.
5. 5. Velte TJ, Masland RH: Action potentials in the dendrites of retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol 1999, 81:1412-1417.
6. 6. Mastronarde DN: Correlated firing of retinal ganglion cells. Trends Neurosci 1989, 12:75-80.
7. 7. Usrey WM, Reid RC: Synchronous activity in the visual system. Annu Rev Physiol 1999, 61:435-456.
8. 8. Meister M, Lagnado L, Baylor DA: Concerted signaling by retinal ganglion cells. Science 1995, 270:1207-1210.
9. 9. Alonso J-M, Usrey WM, Reid RC: Precisely correlated firing in cells of the lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature 1996, 383:815-819.
10. 10. Usrey WM, Reppas JB, Reid RC: Paired-spike interactions and synaptic efficacy of retinal inputs to the thalamus. Nature 1998, 395:384-387. A retinal ganglion cell spike occurring up to 30 ms after another spike on the same fiber is more likely to cause an LGN spike. The peak enhancement occurs for shorter intervals, around 3-7 ms, which are characteristic of spike bursts. While the data appear roughly consistent with an integrate-and-fire mechanism, the authors stress the likelihood that presynaptic mechanisms are involved.
11. 11. Dan Y, Alonso J-M, Usrey WM, Reid RC: Coding of visual information by precisely correlated spikes in the lateral geniculate nucleus. Nat Neurosci 1998, 1:501-507. Two simultaneous spike trains were broken into three trains, including two trains of non-coincident spikes and one train containing the coincident spikes. An information theoretic analysis showed that the set of three derived spike trains carried 20% more information on average about the visual stimulus than did the set of two original spike trains considered in isolation. The exact nature of the additional information with respect to the visual stimulus and the individually defined receptive fields remains unclear.
12. 12. Buračas GT, Zador AM, DeWeese MR, Albright TD: Efficient discrimination of temporal patterns by motion-sensitive neurons in primate visual cortex. Neuron 1998, 20:959-969.
13. 13. Warzecha A-K, Egelhaaf M: Variability in spike trains during constant and dynamic stimulation. Science 1999, 283:1927-1930. While this paper focuses on similarities in response variance for constant and dynamic motion stimuli in an identified motion-sensitive neuron in the blowfly, some differences in the responses to the two types of stimuli are visible in the data, which show similarity to primate direction-selective cortical neurons. In particular, the highest instantaneous firing rates were obtained for motion reversals in the dynamic stimuli (see their figure 1d).
14. 14. Gautrais J, Thorpe S: Rate coding versus temporal order coding: a theoretical approach. Biosystems 1998, 48:57-65. A list of the shortcomings of rate coding with noisy Poisson neurons is given. A model of rank-order coding is proposed, but limitations due to timing jitter are not examined quantitatively.
15. 15. Van Rullen R, Gautrais J, Delorme A, Thorpe S: Face processing using one spike per neurone. Biosystems 1998, 48:229-239.
16. 16. Lisberger SG, Movshon JA: Visual motion analysis for pursuit eye movements in area MT of macaque monkeys. J Neurosci 1999, 19:2224-2246.
17. 17. Felleman DJ, Van Essen DC: Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 1991, 1:1-47.
18. 18. Schmolesky MT, Wang Y, Hanes DP, Thompson KG, Leutgeb S, Schall JD, Leventhal AG: Signal timing across the macaque visual system. J Neurophysiol 1998, 79:3272-3278. Response latencies are computed for a large set of visual areas using the same stimuli and, to some extent, within the same monkeys. For a set of areas (V2, V3, MT, MST, and FEF) ranging broadly across the anatomical hierarchy described in [17], neuronal responses occur with roughly the same average latencies and all within 6-9 ms after activity in V1, except for V2, which has an even longer average latency. See also [20•].
19. 19. Nowak LG, Munk MHJ, James AC, Girard P, Bullier J: Cross correlation study of the temporal interactions between areas V1 and V2 of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol 1999, 81:1057-1074. The synchronization of responses found in V1 and V2 is consistent with the parallel arrangement of cat areas 17 and 18, in spite of the apparent hierarchical organization of these cortical areas in monkey.
20. 20. Maunsell JHR, Ghose GM, Assad JA, McAdams CJ, Boudreau CE, Noerager BD: Visual response latencies of magnocellular and parvocellular LGN neurons in macaque monkeys. Vis Neurosci 1999, 16:1-14. The discussion offers a striking demonstration of the effect of the numerical convergence of inputs on response latency. However, the paper suggests that a neuron, Y, could have a response detectable before those of its inputs, X. Presumably, this refers to the detectability of X's and Y's responses by some other neuron (having fixed inputs and a detection criterion), which is a separate matter from the detectability of their responses by an experimenter who can run more trials and estimate latency to the necessary accuracy to establish that signals are available sooner in X than Y.
21. 21. Victor JD, Purpura KP: Nature and precision of temporal coding in visual cortex: a metric space analysis. J Neurophysiol 1996, 76:1310-1326.
22. 22. Mechler F, Victor JD, Purpura KP, Shapley R: Robust temporal coding of contrast by V1 neurons for transient but not for steady-state stimuli. J Neurosci 1998, 18:6583-6598. Spike distance metrics [21] and Fourier components were used to compare the temporal encoding of contrast for transient (drifting edges) and steady-state (drifting sinusoidal) stimuli. Complex cells were found to convey additional information in their spike timing for the transient stimuli. Some fraction of this additional information may be attributable to increased stimulus-locked modulation.
23. 23. Victor JD, Purpura KP: Spatial phase and the temporal structure of the response to gratings in V1. J Neurophysiol 1998, 80:554-571.
24. 24. Optican LM, Richmond BJ: Temporal encoding of two-dimensional patterns by single units in primate inferior temporal cortex. III. Information theoretic analysis. J Neurophysiol 1987, 57:162-178.
25. 25. Reich DS, Victor JD, Knight BW: The power ratio and the interval map: spiking models and extracellular recordings. J Neurosci 1998, 18:10090-10104. Heuristics are designed to assess whether a spike train belongs to a class of point processes whose mean rate variations are accounted for by a simple warping of time. This class includes an inhomogeneous Poisson process, but excludes spike trains with absolute refractory periods and ones generated by a leaky integrate-and-fire model. Cat X-type retinal ganglion cells fail the membership test.
26. 26. Berry MJ, Meister M: Refractoriness and neural precision. J Neurosci 1998, 18:2200-2211. Can the spike train statistics of a retinal ganglion cell be accounted for by a rate modulated process with a refractory period? This thorough and lucid account shows that such a model very closely matches a broad range of statistics, including the entropy of the spike train.
27. 27. Golomb D, Kleinfeld D, Reid RC, Shapley RM, Shraiman BI: On temporal codes and the spatio-temporal response of neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus. J Neurophysiol 1994, 72:2990-3003.
28. 28. Reinagel P, Godwin D, Sherman SM, Koch C: Encoding of visual information by LGN bursts. J Neurophysiol 1999, 81:2558-2569.
29. 29. Guido W, Sherman SM: Response latencies of cells in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus are less variable during burst than tonic firing. Visual Neurosci 1998, 15:231-237.
30. 30. DeBusk BC, DeBruyn EJ, Snider RK, Kabara JF, Bonds AB: Stimulus-dependent modulation of spike burst length in cat striate cortical cells. J Neurophysiol 1997, 78:199-213.
31. 31. Snider RK, Kabara JF, Roig BR, Bonds AB: Burst firing and modulation of functional connectivity in cat striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 1998, 80:730-744.
32. 32. Castelo-Branco M, Neuenschwander S, Singer W: Synchronization of visual responses between the cortex, lateral geniculate nucleus, and retina in the anesthetized cat. J Neurosci 1998, 18:6395-6410.
33. 33. Brecht M, Singer W, Engel AK: Correlation analysis of corticotectal interactions in the cat visual system. J Neurophysiol 1998, 79:2394-2407.
34. 34. Volgushev M, Chistiakova M, Singer W: Modification of discharge patterns of neocortical neurons by induced oscillations of the membrane potential. Neuroscience 1998, 83:15-25.
35. 35. Lestienne R, Tuckwell HC: The significance of precisely replicating patterns in mammalian CNS spike trains. Neuroscience 1998, 82:315-336. Particular care is taken to measure the incidence of repeating triplets with metrics that have little or no dependence on firing rate. This is critical because the number of repeating triplets expected for a Poisson spike train can, for example, increase as the sixth power of firing rate. See also Oram et al. (MW Oram, R Lestienne, MC Wiener, BJ Richmond Soc Neurosci Abstr 1998, 24:1258).
36. 35. Lestienne R, Tuckwell HC: The significance of precisely replicating patterns in mammalian CNS spike trains. Neuroscience 1998, 82:315-336. Particular care is taken to measure the incidence of repeating triplets with metrics that have little or no dependence on firing rate. This is critical because the number of repeating triplets expected for a Poisson spike train can, for example, increase as the sixth power of firing rate. See also Oram et al. (MW Oram, R Lestienne, MC Wiener, BJ Richmond Soc Neurosci Abstr 1998, 24:1258).
37. 36. Prut Y, Vaadia E, Bergman H, Haalman I, Slovin H, Abeles M: Spatiotemporal structure of cortical activity: properties and behavioral relevance. J Neurophysiol 1998, 79:2857-2874.
38. 37. Lampl I, Reichova I, Ferster D: Synchronous membrane potential fluctuations in neurons of the cat visual cortex. Neuron 1999, 22:361-374. Intracellular recording suggests that the synaptic inputs to neurons sharing similar positions and properties in visual cortex are highly correlated, both during spontaneous activity and visual stimulation. See also [41•].
39. 38. MacLeod K, Bäcker A, Laurent G: Who reads temporal information contained across synchronized and oscillatory spike trains? Nature 1998, 395:693-698. The pharmacological disruption of synchrony in a neuronal population (without accompanied disruption of single neuronal selectivity) in the locust olfactory system is shown to be accompanied by a reduced ability of downstream neurons to encode stimulus information (i.e. odor identity) in their spike trains. Similar solid support for the relevance of synchronized oscillation in the mammalian visual system has yet to been found.
40. 39. Roelfsema PR: Solutions for the binding problem. Z Naturforsch [C] 1998, 53:691-715.
41. 40. Lamme VAF, Spekreijse H: Neural synchrony does not represent texture segregation. Nature 1998, 396:362-366. Using textures and moving dots to distinguish figure from ground, this study tests carefully for changes in synchrony that might relate to changes in the representation of the figure and ground by two neurons with nearby receptive fields. Of many conditions tested, only one revealed evidence for a change in synchrony, and this was interpreted as consistent with simple models of orientation-tuned common input.
42. 41. Azouz R, Gray CM: Cellular mechanisms contributing to response variability of cortical neurons in vivo. J Neurosci 1999, 19:2209-2223. Membrane voltage fluctuations measured right before visual stimulus onset are correlated with those following stimulus onset and with the evoked spike count. Variations in membrane potential, changes in spike threshold, and stimulus dependent high-frequency inputs all contribute to spike variability. This paper is interesting to read in combination with [37•].
43. 42. Stevens CF, Zador AM: Input synchrony and the irregular firing of cortical neurons. Nat Neurosci 1998, 1:210-217. By injecting current into neocortical neurons in slice, the authors attempt to resolve the question of whether random EPSPs and IPSPs adding passively can account for the ubiquitous observations of high variability in cortex in vivo. The results suggest that some structure to the input is required.
44. 43. Koester HJ, Sakmann B: Calcium dynamics in single spines during coincident pre-and postsynaptic activity depend on relative timing of back-propagating action potentials and subthreshold excitatory postsynaptic potentials. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998, 95:9596-9601.
45. 44. Schiller J, Schiller Y, Clapham DE: NMDA receptors amplify calcium influx into dendritic spines during associative pre-and postsynaptic activation. Nat Neurosci 1998, 1:114-118.
46. 45. Yuste R, Majewska A, Cash SS, Denk W: Mechanisms of calcium influx into hippocampal spines: heterogeneity among spines, coincidence detection by NMDA receptors, and optical quantal analysis. J Neurosci 1999, 19:1976-1987.
47. 2+ spike initiation and is highly sensitive to inhibitory inputs, which can shut it off for hundreds of milliseconds.
48. 47. Fregnac Y: A tale of two spikes. Nat Neurosci 1999, 2:299-301.
49. 48. Shadlen MN, Newsome WT: The variable discharge of cortical neurons: implications for connectivity, computation, and information coding. J Neurosci 1998, 18:3870-3896. In this tale, the champion of spike timing, coincidence detection, starved for correlated inputs and deprived of its arsenal of intrinsic neuronal dynamics, dies an untimely death. A bleak cortex populated by undifferentiated neurons is then over-run by the 'high-input regime' in which the forces of excitation and inhibition clash to produce spike trains where noise is actually noise and signal is carried by mean firing rate. When the regime runs into trouble propagating information rapidly, it marshals ensembles of 100 redundant neurons that revive correlated input just before the end. Compare this view to that of [14•,15,42•].
50. 49. Alonso J-M, Martinez LM: Functional connectivity between simple cells and complex cells in cat striate cortex. Nat Neurosci 1998, 1:395-403. The latency and width of cross-correlogram peaks is consistent with functional connectivity from layer IV simple cells to layer II and III complex cells. The brief time scale of these peaks is plotted in Figure 1e (top bar).