Erratum: Prevalence of workplace bullying and risk groups: A representative population study (Int Arch Occup Environ Health (2009) vol. 82 (417-426) (10.1007/s00420-008-0339-8));Prevalence of workplace bullying and risk groups: A representative population study

International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health

Volumn 82, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 417-426

  Ortega, Adriana ^a   Høgh, Annie ^a   Pejtersen, Jan Hyld ^a   Olsen, Ole ^a  

^a NATIONAL RESEARCH CENTRE FOR THE WORKING ENVIRONMENT   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Gender ratio; Occupations; Population study; Work characteristics; Workplace bullying

Indexed keywords

ADULT; DENMARK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES; OCCUPATIONS; PREVALENCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; WORKPLACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 59149087326     PISSN: 03400131     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00420-009-0409-6     Document Type: Erratum

References (38)

1. Agervold M, Mikkelsen EG (2004) Relationships between bullying, psychosocial work environment and individual stress reactions. Work Stress 8:336-351. doi: 10.1080/02678370412331319794
2. Björkqvist K, Österman K, Hjelt-Bäck M (1994) Aggression among university employees. Aggress Behav 20:173-184. doi: 10.1002/ 1098-2337(1994)20:3≤173::AID-AB2480200304≥3.0.CO;2-D
3. Cowie H, Jennifer D, Neto C, Angulo JC, Pereira B, Del Barrio C, et al. Sheehan, M.; Ramsey, S.; Patrick, J. (2000) Comparing the nature of workplace bullying in two European countries: Portugal and UK. Transcending boundaries: Integrating people, processes and systems, Brisbane, 6-9-2000
4. Dansk fagkode (The Danish job classification) (1986) The Directorate of Labour, Copenhagen. på NFA
5. Dansk Branchekode (2003) DB03 Danish Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities 2003 (in danish). Danmarks Statistik (Statistics Denmark), Copenhagen 2002. på NFA
6. Einarsen S (1996) Bullying and harassment at work: Epidemiological and psychosocial aspects. University of Bergen, Afhandlingen haves.
7. Einarsen S (2000) Harassment and bullying at work: A review of the Scandinavian approach. Aggress Violent Behav 5:379-401. doi: 10.1016/ S1359-1789(98)00043-3
8. Einarsen S, Raknes BI (1997) Harassment in the workplace and the victimization of men. Violence Vict 12:247-263
9. Einarsen S, Skogstad A (1996) Bullying at work: Epidemiological findings in public and private organizations. Eur Work Organ Psychol 5:185-201. doi: 10.1080/13594329608414854
10. Einarsen S, Zapf D (2003) Individual antecedents of bullying: Victims and perpetrators. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. international perspectives in research and practice. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 165-184
11. Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (2003) The concept of bullying at work: The European tradition. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. international perspectives in research and practice. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 3-30.
12. Feveile H, Olsen O, Hogh A (2007) A randomized trial of mailed questionnaires versus telephone interviews: Response patterns in a survey. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:27. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-27
13. Hoel H, Cooper CL (2000) Destructive conflict and bullying at work. University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, Manchester
14. Hoel H, Cooper CL, Faragher B (2001) The experience of bullying in Great Britain: The impact of organizational status. Eur Work Organ Psychol 10:443-465. doi: 10.1080/13594320143000780
15. Hoel H, Einarsen S, Keashley L, Zapf D, Cooper CL (2003) Bullying at work. The way forward. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace. International perspectives in research and practice. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 412-416
16. Hofstede G (1980) Cultures consequences: International differences in work related values. Sage, Newbury Park
17. Hofstede G (1991) Cultures and organzations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill, London
18. Hogh A, Dofradottir A (2001) Coping with bullying in the workplace. Eur Work Organ Psycho 10:485-495. doi: 10.1080/13594320143000825
19. Hubert AB, van Veldhoven M (2001) Risk sectors for undesirable behaviour and mobbing. Eur Work Organ Psychol 10:415-424. doi: 10.1080/ 13594320143000799
20. Leymann H (1992) Vuxenmobbning på svenska arbetsplatser. Stockholm: Arbetarskyddsstyrelsen; Report No.: 1. kopi
21. Leymann H (1996) The content and development of mobbing at work. Eur Work Organ Psychol 5:165-184. doi: 10.1080/13594329608414853
22. Mikkelsen EG, Einarsen S (2001) Bullying in Danish work-life: Prevalence and health correlates. Eur Work Organ Psychol 10:393-413. doi: 10.1080/ 13594320143000816
23. Moayed FA, Daraiseh N, Shell R, Salem S (2006) Workplace bullying: A systematic review of risk factors and outcomes. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 7:311-327. doi: 10.1080/14639220500090604
24. Niedhammer I, David S, Degioanni S (2007) Economic activities and occupations at high risk for workplace bullying: Results from a large-scale cross-sectional survey in the general working population in France. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 80:346-353. doi: 10.1007/ s00420-006-0139-y
25. Niedl K (1996) Mobbing and well-being: Economic and personnel development implications. Eur Work Organ Psychol 5:239-249. doi: 10.1080/ 13594329608414857
26. Quine L (1999) Workplace bullying in NHS trust: Staff questionnaire survey. BMJ 318:228-232
27. Rayner C, Hoel H (1997) A summary review of literature relating to workplace bullying. J Community Appl Soc Psychol 7(3):181-191
28. Rayner C, Keashly L (2005) Bullying at work: A perspective from Britain and North America. In: Fox S, Spector PE Counterproductive work behavior. Investigations of actors and targets. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, pp 271-296
29. Rayner C, Hoel H, Cooper CL (2002) Workplace bullying. Taylor & Francis, London
30. Salin D (2001) Prevalence and forms of bullying among business professionals: A comparison of two different strategies for measuring bullying. Eur Work Organ Psychol 10:425-441. doi: 10.1080/ 13594320143000771
31. Siemiatycki J, Campbell S, Richardson L, Aubert D (1984) Quality of response in different population groups in mail and telephone surveys. Am J Epidemiol 120:302-314
32. Thorsted BL (2007) Forskerbeskyttelse i CPR. Det 29. symposium i anvendt statistikÅrhus Universitet: Danmarks Statistik van der Zouwen, J. and de Leeuw, E. D. (1991) The relationship between mode of administration and quality of data in survey research. Bull Methodol Sociol 31:49-60
33. van der Zouwen J, de Leeuw ED (1991) The relationship between mode of administration and quality of data in survey research. Bull Methodol Sociol 31:49-60
34. Vartia M (1996) The sources of bullying - psychological work environment and organizational climate. Eur Work Organ Psychol 5:203-214. doi: 10.1080/13594329608414855
35. Vartia M (2003) Workplace bullying - a study on the work environment, well-being and health. Finnish Institute of Occupational Health
36. Vartia M, Hyyti J (2002) Gender differences in workplace bullying among prison officers. Eur Work Organ Psychol 11(1):113-126. doi: 10.1080/ 13594320143000870
37. Zapf D, Einarsen S (2005) Mobbing at work: Escalated conflicts in organizations. In: Fox S, Spector PE Counterproductive work behavior. investigations of actors and targets. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, pp 237-270
38. Zapf D, Einarsen S, Hoel H, Vartia M (2003) Empirical findings on bullying in the workplace. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL (eds) Bullying and emotional abuse in the workplace international perspectives in research and practice, 1st edn edn. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 103-126