Returning home: Location memory versus posture memory in object manipulation

Experimental Brain Research

Volumn 179, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 191-198

  Weigelt, Matthias ^a,b   Cohen, Rajal ^c   Rosenbaum, David A ^c  

^a BIELEFELD UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY POSITION; BODY POSTURE; FEMALE; HOME; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NORMAL HUMAN; OBJECT MANIPULATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PLANNING; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADULT; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; POSTURE; SPACE PERCEPTION; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING;

EID: 34247597377     PISSN: 00144819     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0780-4     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Blakemore SJ, Wolpert DM, Frith CD (2002) Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends Cognit Sci 6:237-242
2. Cohen RG, Rosenbaum DA (2004) Where grasps are made reveals how grasps are planned: generation and recall of motor plans. Exp Brain Res 157(4):486-495
3. Hommel B, Muesseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24(5):849-878
4. Kunde W, Weigelt M (2005) Goal-congruency in bimanual object manipulation. J Exp Psychol Human Percept Perform 31(1):145-156
5. Logan GD (1988) Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychol Rev 95:492-527
6. Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Jeannerod M, Athenes S, Dugas C (1987) Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Can J Psychol 4:365-378
7. Rosenbaum DA, Jorgensen MJ (1992) Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control. Hum Move Sci 11:61-69
8. Rosenbaum DA, Marchak F, Barnes HJ, Vaughan J, Slotta JD, Jorgensen MJ (1990) Constraints for action selection: overhand versus underhand grip. In: Jeanerod M (ed) Attention and performance XIII. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 321-342
9. Rosenbaum DA, Loukopoulos LD, Meulenbroek RG, Vaughan J, Engelbrecht SE (1995) Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychol Rev 102:26-67
10. Rosenbaum DA, van Heugten CM, Caldwell GE (1996) From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect. Acta Psychol 94:59-85
11. Rosenbaum DA, Meulenbroek RJ, Vaughan J (1999) Remembered positions: stored locations or stored postures? Exp-Brain Res 124:503-512
12. Rosenbaum DA, Meulenbroek RG, Vaughan J, Jansen C (2001) Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping. Psychol Rev 108:709-734
13. Rosenbaum DA, Halloran E, Cohen RG (2006) Precision requirements affect grasp choices. Psychon Bull Rev
14. Short MW, Cauraugh JH (1997) Planning macroscopic aspects of manual control: end-state comfort and point-of-change effects. Acta Psychol 96:133-147
15. Short MW, Cauragh JH (1999) Precision hypothesis and the end-sate comfort effect. Acta Psychol 100:243-252
16. Smyth MM (1984) Memory for movements. In: Smyth MM, Wing AM (eds) The psychology of human movement. Academic, London, pp 83-117
17. Weigelt M, Kunde W, Prinz W (2006) End-state comfort in bimanual object manipulation. Exp Psychol 53(2):143-148
18. Willingham DB, Wells LA, Farrell JM, Stemwedel ME (2000) Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations. Memory Cognit 28:366-375
19. Wolpert DM, Flanagan JR (2001) Motor prediction. Curr Biol 11:729-723