An exploratory study to determine how parents decide whether to enrol their infants into neonatal clinical trials

Journal of Neonatal Nursing

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 18-24

  Jollye, Simonne ^a  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Altruism guilt; Decision making; Neonatal research trials; Parents; Risks benefits

Indexed keywords

EID: 58949092628     PISSN: 13551841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnn.2008.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Burgess E., et al. Consent for clinical research in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective survey and a prospective study. Archive of Disease in Children Fetal and Neonatal Edition 88 (2003) F280-F285
2. Campbell H., et al. A review of randomised controlled trials published in Archives of Disease in Childhood from 1982-1996. Archives of Disease in Childhood 79 (1998) 192-197
3. Chappuy H., et al. Parental consent in paediatric clinical research. Archives of Disease in Childhood 91 (2006) 112-116
4. Cresswell J.W. Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions (1998), Sage, Thousand Oaks
5. Gammelgaard A., et al. Perceptions of parents on the participation of their infants in clinical research. Archives of Disease in Childhood 91 (2006) 977-980
6. Hoehn K.S., et al. What factors are important to parents making decisions about neonatal research?. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 90 (2005) F267-F269
7. Mason S.A., Allmark P.F., and for the EURICON study. Obtaining informed consent to neonatal randomised controlled trials: interviews with parents and clinicians in the EURICON study. The Lancet 356 (2000) 2045-2051
8. Morley C.J., et al. What do parents think about enrolling their premature babies in several research studies?. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 90 (2005) F225-F228
9. Nicklin S., and Spencer S.A. Recruitment failure in early neonatal research". Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 89 (2004) F281
10. Singhal N., et al. Parents' perceptions of research with newborns. Journal of Perinatology 22 1 (2002) 57-63
11. Snowdon C., Garcia J., and Elbourne D. Making sense of randomisation responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial. Social Science Medicine 45 (1997) 1337-1355
12. Snowdon C., Elbourne D., and Garcia J. It was a snap decision": parental and professional perspectives on the speed of decisions about participation in perinatal randomised controlled trials". Available from:. Journal of Social Science and Medicine (2005). http://www.elsevier.com/locate/socscimed (accessed 12.03.06)
13. Stenson B.J., Becher J.-C., and McIntosh N. Neonatal research: the parental perspective. Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal and Neonatal Edition 89 (2004) F321-F324
14. Tait A.R., et al. Priorities of disclosure of the elements of informed consent for research: a comparison between parents and investigators. Paediatric Anaesthesia 12 (2002) 332-426