A statistical motion model based on biomechanical simulations for data fusion during image-guided prostate interventions

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 5241 LNCS, Issue PART 1, 2008, Pages 737-744

  Hu, Yipeng ^a   Morgan, Dominic ^a   Ahmed, Hashim Uddin ^a   Pendsé, Doug ^a,b   Sahu, Mahua ^a   Allen, Clare ^b   Emberton, Mark ^a   Hawkes, David ^a   Barratt, Dean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biomechanical modelling; Minimally invasive interventions; Prostate; Statistical shape modelling; Transrectal ultrasound

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICAL MODELLING; MINIMALLY-INVASIVE INTERVENTIONS; PROSTATE; STATISTICAL SHAPE MODELLING; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND;

ACOUSTIC WAVES; ALGORITHMS; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER SCIENCE; DEFORMATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IMAGE FUSION; MEDICAL COMPUTING; PHOTOLITHOGRAPHY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SURFACE MOUNT TECHNOLOGY; ULTRASONIC IMAGING; ULTRASONICS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOPHYSICS; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOTION; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ARTIFACTS; BIOPHYSICAL PHENOMENA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MOTION; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 58849156560     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85988-8_88     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (9)

1. Byrne, T.E.: A review of prostate motion with considerations for the treatment of prostate cancer. Medical Dosimetry 30, 155-161 (2005)
2. Dam, E.B., et al.: Prostate shape modelling based on principal geodesic analysis bootstrapping. In: Barillot, C., Haynor, D.R., Hellier, P. (eds.) MICCAI 2004. LNCS, vol. 3217, pp. 1008-1016. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
3. Bharatha, A., et al.: Evaluation of three-dimensional finite element-based deformable registration of pre-and intraoperative prostate imaging. Med. Phys. 28, 2551-2560 (2001)
4. Crouch, J.R., et al.: Automated finite element analysis for deformable registration of prostate images. IEEE Trans. on Med. Imag. 26, 1379-1390 (2007)
5. Chi, Y., et al.: A material sensitivity study on the accuracy of deformable organ registration using linear biomechanical models. Med. Phys. 33, 421-433 (2006)
6. Mohamed, A., et al.: A combined statistical and biomechanical model for estimation of intra-operative prostate deformation. In: Dohi, T., Kikinis, R. (eds.) MICCAI 2002. LNCS, vol. 2489, pp. 452-460. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
7. Alterovitz, R., et al.: Registration of MR prostate images with biomechanical modeling and nonlinear parameter estimation. Med. Phys. 33, 446-454 (2006)
8. Thompson, et al.: Use of a CT statistical deformation model for multi-modal pelvic bone segmentation. In: Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging (2008)
9. Schallenkamp. J., et al.: Prostate position relative to pelvic bony anatomy based on intraprostatic gold markers and electronic portal imaging. Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys. 63, 800-811 (2005)